Answer:
The Ottoman Turks were determined to capture Constantinople. Their nickname for it was the 'Golden Apple', the ultimate prize.
Explanation:
The Ottoman Turks were determined to capture Constantinople. Their nickname for it was the ‘Golden Apple’, the ultimate prize. Like New York, the ‘Big Apple’ of our times, Constantinople, the Golden Apple, was seen at the time as the ultimate metropolis, the ultimate object of desire. Given all this, it was clear that eventually, the city must fall, and the real wonder is how long it had held out, given its deeply weakened state.
What is our claim statement?
The English and colonists did not like each other
There was rising tension between the colonists and the English government in the 1760s and 1770s
I wish pizza could always have pineapple
Mrs. Wilson loves history
What is the first piece of evidence that supports the claim?
What is the second piece of evidence that supports the claim?
What is the third piece of evidence that supports the claim?
Answer:
Explanation:
The first one is the claim, because it's an opinion you are trying to back with evidence.
The first piece of supporting evidence is the second one, because it is based on facts that support your claim. The third one is an opinion, and the forth one is an unrelated fact.
How did the American colonists react to British taxes?
Answer:
Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.
Explanation:
The government of a country led by a kind would be a?
Answer:
A monarchy is a government ruled by a king or a queen who inherits their position from their family, which is often called the "royal family."
Explanation:
I assume you meant king? If not, I apologize.
__________ are the political leaders of the United States who helped in creating its system of government.
A.
The followers of Shays’ Rebellion
B.
Congress
C.
The Supreme Court justices
D.
The Framers
Answer:
B I hope this helps and is right!
Describing 5 ways the American culture has changed throughout time. What in your opinion, is the most important change in the history of U.S. Immigration/Migration and why do you think this is so? Support your answer.
Answering u get it tell me
Explanation:
Why Americans do not vote
Answer:
theyy dont care
Explanation:
Explanation:
this is because in America everything is on like son took place of his father and become the king but in other countries like India a prime minister and president is elected in election after every 5 years and then a Prime Minister or president is elected
What do you know about the diffirent literart periods in philippine literature
Answer:
literary traditions of Philippine literature -- Native, Islamic, Spanish, American, and Nationalist – which in turn belong to any of the three historical periods of Philippine history: Pre-Colonial, Colonial, and Post-Colonial.
What city served as the capital of the United States? Why?
Answer:
dc
Explanation:
Which of the following amendments guarantees future rights for the people?
0 10th
7th
8th
0 9th
Answer: 9th amendment
Explanation:
Where was the “Margherita” pizza first made, and who was it made for?
Answer:
June 1889 in Naples in honor of the Queen of Italy
The ¨Margherita¨ pizza was made in June 1889 in Naples in honor of the Queen of Italy
Explain how the Earth’s surface can be organized into continents and oceans. Describe this way of organizing the Earth in at least two to three sentences.
Answer:
One way to organize our world is to separate it into continents and oceans. Our continents are Earth’s largest land masses. The Earth’s land masses are divided into seven different continents. Our oceans are actually connected as part of one large body of water, but we split it into four different pieces. We organize our world by giving names to these continents and oceans.
witch one is it A or B
help ASAP!!!!!!
Answer:
l think is A.
Explanation:
using the poem revolutionary tea answer the following questions who do you think wrote this poem A. king/ queen of england B. parliament C. colonist or D.Native Americans
Answer:
b.parliament
Explanation:
What was the results of the Jewish-Roman war of 66 CE?
Answer:
The Romans defeated the Jews under the command of Titus, who destroyed the rebellion.
Explanation:
This war actually started as a rebellion of Jews against the Roman rule in Judea. It lasted for four years. Although in the beginning the rebels had certain success the rebellion was destroyed in 70 CE. Judea was totally under control of Rome once again.
What conflicts would farmers have faced expanding west after the civil war?
Answer:
If the farmers faced west and expanding it after the war then the crops might not grow right or it could kill the plants.
Explanation:
We should raise taxes on the richest Americans to pay for the things our country needs.
Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree and describe your opinion in AT LEAST two sentences.
This is something where the answer will depend on which side you pick. So you have a choice on what to do. Here are two viewpoints.
---------------
In favor:
I agree that we should raise taxes on the wealthiest people in the country because they can afford to pay them. Their lifestyle won't be affected too much compared to someone who is struggling to put food on the table, pay rent, or pay for health insurance. Wealthy Americans take advantage of various infrastructure everyday and possibly don't realize it, so it makes sense to have them pay their fair share. With the wealthy contributing more, it gives the lower class workers a more fair share to get a better foot hold and have a higher standard of living. The more people with a higher standard of living, the better the country off is as a whole.
---------------
Against:
I don't agree that we should raise taxes on wealthy Americans. Higher taxes discourages people from earning money since those in a higher tax bracket are going to pay a higher rate. This unintended consequence pushes people to stay in a lower bracket and not earn their full potential. Also, higher taxes chases people away to lower/no tax locations. In a sense, it's like pursuing the path of least resistance. Even if the tax money was collected, it is likely to be spent in places where it shouldn't possibly due to corruption or incompetence.
---------------
Of course these are just basic outlines to help you get started when it comes to writing your response. Feel free to add or take away anything that fits your style.
Answer: Yes
The wealthy earn a lot of money. It would benefit our country if they pay some money to pay for the things our country needs.
If they have so much money, can they not pay some taxes?
PLZZ I NEED THIS NOW Why have debates become more consistent since 1987?
Answer:
it is alot easier for the public to beable to see what unfolds
Explanation:
State governments are required to
Answer:
State and local governments exercise important functions in the United States. They plan and pay for most roads, run public schools, provide water, organize police and fire services, establish zoning regulations, license professions, and arrange elections for their citizens.
Answer:
State governments are required to run public schools, provide water, organize fire department and police services, and arrange elections.
Explanation:
emilythompson35464 hope it helps srry if it doesn't tho
What is Paul's main point about the new legislation?
Read the quote.
It is incredible to me that any woman should consider the
fight for full equality won. It has just begun. There is
hardly a field, economic or political, in which the natural
and unaccustomed policy is not to ignore women. ..
Unless women are prepared to fight politically they must
be content to be ignored politically.
-Alice Paul,
Following the passage of the 19th Amendment, 1920
O The new law will bring women their goal of equal
rights very soon.
O Women should naturally expect to be treated more
fairly under the new law.
O Women must fight each other politically to achieve
true equality under the law.
O The new Taw giving women the right to vote was a
first step in the long road to equality.
Answer: The new law giving women the right to vote was a first step in the long road to equality.
Just took the test btw
"To judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty. An over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good."—Alexander Hamilton, 1787Which of the following accurately reflects the excerpt?
Answer:
In the given excerpt, Hamilton presented himself as a Federalist arguing that the Constitution is necessary to quiet the radical elements in society.
Explanation:
Federalist No. 1 was an essay written by Alexander Hamilton. This essay later became the series of Federalist Papers composed by Alexander Hamilton, John Madison, and John Jay under pseudonym 'Publius'.
Federalist No. 1 was written to the people of New York State. The given text is taken from Federalist No. 1.
In the given text, Hamilton presented himself as a federalist arguing the point that the Constitution is important to silent the radical elements in society. The paper was written with the purpose to convince the audience about the importance of Constitution.
Which religion teaches that people are born into their position in society based upon their deeds in a previous life? 5 points Judaism Hinduism Islam Zoroastrianism
Answer:
B. Hinduism.
Explanation:
Hinduism refers to a religion of the Indian people and it is considered to be a way of life.
Generally, Hinduism is focused on the following philosophies;
Samsara: beliefs on the cycle of death and rebirth. Dharma: beliefs on duties or ethics. Karma: beliefs that there are consequences for every action or intents. Moksha: beliefs on salvation or the liberation from death and rebirth cycle. Artha: beliefs on being prosperous. Kama: beliefs on desires and passion as an aim of humanity.Hinduism as a religion teaches that people are born into their position in society based upon their deeds in a previous life. This is explicitly explained by the Karma theory of Hinduism, it states that the circumstances an individual is experiencing in his or her (present) life is as a result of their actions in the previous life.
Hence, Hinduism is a religion that teaches people about the spiritual principles of cause and effects such that an individual's action or intent in the previous life influences their life in the future (rebirth).
Which of the following
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Which statements reflect Sumerian religious beliefs?
Answer:
Sumerian religion was the religion practiced and adhered to by the people of Sumer, the first literate civilization of ancient Mesopotamia. The Sumerians regarded their divinities as responsible for all matters pertaining to the natural and social orders
How did Martin Luther change history?!
Answer:
Martin Luther helped the spread of the Protestant Reformation by writing the 95 theses. ps:(The question said "Martin Luther", not Martin Luther King)
Explanation:
Which of the following is an example of the reciprocity norm? A. helping a young child learn algebra B. doing weekly chores for one’s parents C. leaving the waiter a tip while traveling D. treating oneself to a movie night
Answer:
B.
doing weekly chores for one’s parents
Explanation:
An example of the reciprocity norm is doing weekly chores for one’s parents. Thus the correct option is B.
What is the reciprocity norm?To help both parties, reciprocity necessitates trading commodities and services. People must respond to other people's perspectives, according to the basic principle of personal communication.
When someone does something for us, humans must return in kind. It can be characterized as the hope that others would return favors by exchanging advantages in both good and negative ways.
The emphasis is indeed not always on financial benefit but means making an effort to meet the wants and desires of another person. Its characteristics are represented through performing weekly duties for one's parents.
Therefore, option B is appropriate.
Learn more about reciprocity norms, here:
brainly.com/question/29434678
#SPJ7
Why did European citizens believe in the value of sovereignty
Answer:
Within Europe and the Union national and European political decision makers have several different views of sovereignty. Political science often defines it as the ability to achieve a goal or to assert one's will. More commonly sovereignty can be defined as supreme authority, over which there is no other higher authority. This is often the sense given to the term and used by Europhobic populists when they call for a return to national sovereignty, of which the European Union is said to have deprived their State. In this sense sovereignty seems to be understood as a freedom, which means not being, or no longer being forced to do what others want us to do. However, in the Union approaches to sovereignty are complex, since positive and negative ideas of it coexist. In simple terms we can lay out a dominant model in which some see a defensive kind of sovereignty, a means of protection from external threats, whilst others see it rather as a means to attract external assets by transferring certain competences to the supranational level, to increase the visibility of their individual interests and assets by pooling the latter. This model, which in fact pitches national protection against regional integration, opposes two types of State. On the one hand, there are the former dominant States like France and the UK, which are still attached to certain attributes of sovereignty; on the other, there are smaller States that are more oriented towards taking greater advantage of cooperation. Although this model conceals the complexity of views regarding sovereignty, it does however tend to explain the existence of different political agendas and ways of exercising power in Europe. Hence, sovereignty does not appear to be considered in a uniform manner. It opposes those who see it as an opening to those who see it as a means to closure, both on a national and European political level, which can seriously affect policy in Europe. The aim is now to place these ideas of sovereignty in the context of the 21st century, to refine the study of these complex relations, which are not sovereignty but sovereignties.
We should defund some of the budgets of police departments and use that money for social services, and there should be major changes to the way police do their jobs.
Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree and describe your opinion in AT LEAST two sentences.
Who was the 20th president of u.s.
Answer:
James A. Garfield was the 20th president of the U.S.
Explanation:
james A garfield is the 20th president of the us
The answer to this question.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
i think its right
The period leading up to 1789 and the French Revolution was marked plentiful food,good weather for crops, and peace in the region.
Is this True or False?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The period 1789 and the French Revolution, the country was under crises. Agriculture dependent on nature, the growing population, placed limitations on its expansion after a time. The rising population place a demand on food grains, and consequently, the land under cultivation had extended. Before the French Revolution, the class division and increases in taxes had led peasants to become poor, and people from the third estate could not pay the price of food. Food was in scarcity, and there was a hostile situation in France where people were always hunger and fighting.