100 points if you answer - if it's correct ill give brainliest


(01.04 MC)The elevation of city A is 60 feet above sea level; the elevation of city C is 12 feet above sea level. The elevation of city D is 1 over 2 of the elevation of city C.


Part A: Write an expression to represent the elevation, in feet, of city D. (5 points)


Part B: Solve the expression and explain why the answer is negative or positive. (5 points)

[tex]\qquad \qquad \textit{inverse proportional variation} \\\\ \textit{\underline{y} varies inversely with \underline{x}} ~\hspace{6em} \stackrel{\textit{constant of variation}}{y=\cfrac{\stackrel{\downarrow }{k}}{x}~\hfill } \\\\ \textit{\underline{x} varies inversely with }\underline{z^5} ~\hspace{5.5em} \stackrel{\textit{constant of variation}}{x=\cfrac{\stackrel{\downarrow }{k}}{z^5}~\hfill } \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}[/tex]

[tex]\stackrel{\textit{"y" is inversely proportiional to }x^3}{y = \cfrac{k}{x^3}}\qquad \textit{we also know that} \begin{cases} y = 44\\ x = a \end{cases} \\\\\\ 44 = \cfrac{k}{a^3}\implies 44a^3=k~\hfill \boxed{y=\cfrac{44a^3}{x^3}} \\\\\\ \textit{when x = 2a, what is "y"?}\qquad y = \cfrac{44a^3}{(2a)^3}\implies y = \cfrac{44a^3}{8a^3}\implies \blacktriangleright y = \cfrac{11}{2} \blacktriangleleft[/tex]

Answer:

The scale is 1:18 for the entire room, 1 inch in the diagram for 18 inches IRL

Step-by-step explanation:

12 inches = 1 foot

Convert the feet to inches, then divide both sides of the ratio by the # of inches in the diagram

So for length:

10:(15*12)

10:180

1:18

And for width:

8:12(12)

8:144

1:18

Answer:

18 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks for scale of inches in the drawing and the actual room, so first convert 15 ft and 12 ft into inches.

1 foot= 12in x 1ft= 12 inches

15 feet= 12in x 15ft = 180 inches

12 feet= 12in x 12ft = 144 inches

The room is 180 inches long and 144 inches wide.

To find the scale, set up a proportion to the drawing to the room.

[tex]\frac{10}{8} =\frac{180}{144}[/tex]

You can see that the scale is 18 inches because to get from 180 to 10, you multiply by 18, and the same thing as 8, you would multiply 8 by 18 to get to 144.

Answer:

SSS:

Draw a triangle with sides of 2 cm, 3cm and 4cm and another one of 4cm, 6cm and 8 cm. Both will be SSS congruent.

SAS:

Draw a triangle with sides of 2 cm, 3 cm and another side of your choice. The angle between sides of 2 and 3 cm is 30 degrees. Now draw a triangle with sides of 4 cm, 6cm and another side of your choice (but this one cannot be the double of the 3rd side of the first triangle!) . The angle between the sides of 4 cm and 6 cm should be 60 degrees. Now you have 2 SAS congruent triangles.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 2x + 1

g(x) = ?

h(x) = ln(x)

hgf(x) = ½ln(2x - 3)

All h(x) does is take a natural log of a number, therefore the output

gf(x) = [tex]\sqrt{2x - 3}[/tex]

the change between f(x) and fg(x) is a subtraction of 4 then raising the result to a power of ½.

g(x) = [tex]\sqrt{x - 4}[/tex]

Answer:

3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to make them the same fraction.

2/5 = 4/10

3/10 =3/10

3/10 + 4/10 = 7/10

10/10 - 10/10 =3/10

3/10 is the amount of tigers.

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{4}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-1})\qquad \qquad m = -3 \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{(-1)}=\stackrel{m}{-3}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{4})\implies y+1=-3(x-4) \\\\\\ y+1=-3x+12\implies \stackrel{\textit{slope-intercept form}}{y=-3x+11}[/tex]

does it pass through the origin?  well, we could draw it, or we can just check that, the origin is at 0,0, or namely when x = 0, y = 0, let's see if that's true, let's make x = 0, let's see what we get for "y".

y = -3(0) + 11 => y = 11

woops, no dice, y ≠ 0, so nope, doesn't pass through the origin.

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason why i said nonis cause 96+123+106+72=397 which means he still needs 13 more

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question, I couldn't really tell what the chart looks like, so I am guessing it looks like this:

Sidewalk 1:

x  |  y

2  |  17

0  | 5

Sidewalk 2:

x  |  y

1  |  20

3  | 26

Part a.

Now, we have to write the equation for sidewalk 1 in slope-intercept form.

Slope-intercept form is represented as this: [tex]y=mx+b[/tex], where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Because this is true for all values on the line, we can plug in values of the chart for Sidewalk 1.

[tex]17=2m+b\\5=0m+b[/tex]

Subtracting the second equation from the first, we have

[tex]12=2m[/tex], and [tex]m = 6[/tex].

Now, we can just plug 6 back into the first equation to get:

[tex]17=2(6)+b[/tex]  to get [tex]17 = 12 + b[/tex], and then [tex]b = 5[/tex].

Now, we can just rewrite slope intercept form for Sidewalk 1 to have

[tex]y=6x+5[/tex].

Part b.

Point-slope form is represented as [tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex], where x and y are the coordinates of one point, and x1 and y1 are the coordinates of another point on the line. Because the chart represented for Sidewalk 2 includes a point, namely [tex](1, 20)[/tex] and [tex](3, 26)[/tex], we can plug this in and solve for the slope:

[tex]26-20=m(3-1)[/tex]

This is it in point-slope form. Because the second part of the question asks us to convert to slope-intercept form, we must solve for the slope, or m.

Expanding, we have [tex]26-20=3m-m[/tex]

Combining like terms, we have [tex]6 = 2m[/tex], and then [tex]3 = m[/tex]. Now, we need to plug a point and the slope back into point-slope form, not needing another point. We choose [tex](1, 20)[/tex], even though [tex](3, 26)[/tex] works just as well.

[tex]y-20=3(x-1)[/tex]

Expanding, we have [tex]y-20=3x-3[/tex]

Adding 20 to both sides, we have [tex]y=3x+17[/tex]

Part c. and d.

We see that both equations do not have the same slope, so then they are not parallel, meaning they don't have no solutions. If they have a solution, we can set them equal to each other.

[tex]3x+17=6x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 3x, we have [tex]17=3x+5[/tex]

Subtracting 5, we have [tex]12 = 3x[/tex]

Dividing by 3, we have [tex]x = 4[/tex].

Because there is no x = x, or anything like that, the solution does not have infinite solutions and therefore has one solution, meaning it is consistent independent.

Answer:

A.1 B.2 E.5 F.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps brainliest awnser pls

Answer:

Same thing as before

Convert into improper for it to be easier to solve

11/3 - 9/5

THe common multiple is 15 here

55/15 - 27/15 = 28/15

Now 28/15 into a mixed is

1 13/15

sus susussusususususususus

Answer: if is simplify the answer is 4x+80

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

L spedd

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

hello want to be friends so i can join you and you can join me

Answer:

She is incorrect; Paloma's ratio of seconds travelled to feet travelled is 1:10.

Step-by-step explanation:

Her ratio is 1:10 because the first number is the number of seconds, and the second number is the number of feet. So for every 1 second, she travels 10 feet, as indicated in the original problem.

Hope this helps.

Answer:

b=114°

.....................

c=43°

Answer:

A) 87 degrees

B) 114 degrees

C) 43 degrees

Answer:

4 better inbox

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the equation A = ( 8 . 4 ) + ( 2 . 4 ) + 2 = 42

Equations are mathematical statements with two algebraic expressions flanking the equals (=) sign on either side.

It demonstrates the equality of the relationship between the expressions printed on the left and right sides.

Coefficients, variables, operators, constants, terms, expressions, and the equal to sign are some of the components of an equation. The "=" sign and terms on both sides must always be present when writing an equation.

Given data ,

Let the equation be represented as A

Now , the value of A is

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

A = ( 8 + 2 ) . 4 + 2   be equation (1)

On simplifying the equation , we get

A = ( 10 ) 4 + 2

A = 40 + 2

A = 42

Substitute the value of A as

A = ( 8 . 4 ) + ( 2 . 4 ) + 2

On simplifying the equation , we get

A = 32 + 8 + 2

A = 40 + 2

A = 42

Hence , the equation is A = ( 8 . 4 ) + ( 2 . 4 ) + 2

To learn more about equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/19297665

#SPJ1

2,520

Estimate 627 to 630

3.73's closest estimate is 4

So, 630*4=2,520

A check for $250 serves as an instruction to the bank to withdraw that amount from the account holder's balance and provide it to the recipient upon deposit or cashing.

When a check is written for two hundred fifty dollars ($250) as a withdrawal, it means that the individual is requesting a withdrawal of $250 from their account using a check.

The check serves as a formal written order instructing the bank to pay the specified amount, which in this case is $250, to the person or entity named on the check. The account holder will typically write the check and provide it to the recipient as a means of transferring funds.

The recipient can then deposit or cash the check at their bank, and the bank will process the transaction by deducting $250 from the account holder's bank balance and providing the recipient with the requested funds.

for such more question on transaction

https://brainly.com/question/1016861

#SPJ8

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Please mark brainliest

hope it helps

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

I just know

Answer:

  40 in

Step-by-step explanation:

For a width of w, the length is 3w and the area and perimeter are ...

  A = LW = (3w)(w) = 3w^2

  P = 2(L+W) = 2(3w +w) = 8w

We are given the area, so we can find w to be ...

  75 in^2 = 3w^2

  25 in^2 = w^2 . . . . . divide by 3

  5 in = w . . . . . . . . . square root

Then the perimeter is ...

  P = 8w = 8(5 in) = 40 in

Testing the hypothesis, it is found that since the p-value of the test is of 0.3015, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, the data does not provide enough evidence to show that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is of 23%, that is:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.23[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if this proportion is lower than 23%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.23[/tex]

The test statistic is given by:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

In which:

In this problem, the parameters are: [tex]p = 0.23, n = 1432, \overline{p} = \frac{321}{1432} = 0.2242[/tex]

Then, the value of the test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{p} - p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.2242 - 0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(0.77)}{1432}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -0.52[/tex]

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion of 0.2242 or below, which is the p-value of z = -0.52.

Since the p-value of the test is of 0.3015, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05, the data does not provide enough evidence to show that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/14639462

Answer:

The first one is incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

|a| would still be less than b, because you are mirroring a on the other side of b.

The diagram shows where |a| would lie.

-Chetan K

Answer:

reduce

Step-by-step explanation:

become it is un solvef

Answer:

no solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

-2+1=2+5

-1=7

-1 does not equal 7 so there are no solutions

Answer:

Yes it is 4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

23

if you have 15 gallons of gas and it makes it 345 miles that is 345 divided by 15 which is 23 or 023

15x2 equals 30 34 - 30 equals 4 bring the 5 down you have 45 15x3 equals 45, 45 - 45 equals 0

Answer:

n = 100

Step-by-step explanation:

25 + -100 = 25 - n

=> -100 = -n

=> n = 100

Hoped this helped.

[tex]25-100 = 25 -n\\\\\implies -100 = -n\\\\\implies n = 100[/tex]