1.What happened to nationalism throughout the world following World War II?

It became culturally unacceptable due to the horrors that German hyper-nationalism committed.
It intensified throughout much of the world, leading to widespread independence movements.
It increased in Europe but all but disappeared in Africa and Southeast Asia.
It led to a third wave of imperialism and the creation of new overseas empires.

2.Read this quote from Haidar Abd El-Shafi, then answer the question:

"We, the people of Palestine, stand before you in the fullness of our pain, our pride, and our anticipation, for we long harbored a yearning for peace and a dream of justice and freedom. For too long, the Palestinian people have gone unheeded, silenced and denied, our identity negated by political expedience, our right for struggle against injustice maligned, and our present existence subsumed by the past tragedy of another people."—Haidar Abd El-Shafi, head of the Palestinian Delegation to the Madrid Peace Conference, 1991

The above quote is from a speech given at the Madrid Peace Conference by a Palestinian leader. To which of the following does the speaker attribute the ignoring of his people's suffering?

Palestinians' unrealistic dreams
The Nazi killing of Jews
The excessive pride of Jews
Palestinians' silence on their plight

3.Use this image to answer the question:
This emblem shows a Jewish star inside a shape that combines a fortress and a shield. Which of the following did this emblem most likely represent?

Jewish diaspora
Jewish assimilation
Zionism
Atheism

4.Read this quote from Fidel Castro, then answer the question:

"Marxism taught me what society was. I was like a blindfolded man in a forest, who doesn't even know where north or south is. If you don't eventually come to truly understand the history of the class struggle, or at least have a clear idea that society is divided between the rich and the poor, and that some people subjugate and exploit other people, you're lost in a forest, not knowing anything."—Fidel Castro, 2009

Fidel Castro, long-time leader of Cuba, made the above statement during an interview in 2009. The statement is in response to a question about what influenced him to become a Cuban nationalist. Which of the following can be inferred from this statement?

Geopolitics is important to a people's well-being.
A revolution should arise out of a people's history.
Society's rich should not exploit the poor.
Nonviolence should be used to achieve class equality.

5.The town in this photograph is named Duvalierville. It was founded by the Haitian President Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier. What does this image say about Duvalier's approach toward governing?

He wanted to modernize Haiti.
He focused on improving Haiti's infrastructure.
He did not focus on human welfare programs.
He did not approve of poorly planned projects.

6.Read this quote, then answer the question:

"An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind."

You can tell by the meaning of this quote that this principle was expressed by

Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier
Mahatma Gandhi
Fidel Castro
Yasser Arafat

7.The desired outcome for Basque nationalists in Spain is

limited local autonomy
complete independence
the removal of Spanish troops
a cease-fire with Spain

8.The Yom Kippur War included

increased American arms for the Israelis
a peace agreement between Syria and Israel
a decrease in the violence of the PLO
the assassination of Golda Meir

9.Use this image to answer the question:
This photograph was taken in Rafah in Palestinian territory in 2009. What does the photo reveal about violence in the region?

Entire families are engaged in violent acts of violence.
Children are in harm's way due to acts of violence.
Militants cannot operate out of destroyed buildings.
It has not disrupted the lives of civilians.

10.What do the USMCA and the European Union have in common?

They both promote English as the language of international trade.
They are both moving toward a political union of their members.
Their member nations reduce tariffs to trade with each other.
They have both decreased in size in recent years.

11.How does the European Union differ from the USMCA?

There are tariffs between EU nations.
The USMCA has some political governance elements.
It has its own currency.
The European Union includes fewer nations.

12.Which group in a country is most directly threatened by the international competition of free trade?

domestic suppliers or businesses
domestic consumers
local governments
federal governments

13.How did business impact the process of cultural diffusion in the second half of the twentieth century?

It slowed it down significantly.
It slowed it down modestly.
It had no unmistakable impact.
It accelerated it significantly.

14.Regional trade blocs most directly decrease

outsourcing
immigration
tariffs
tax rates

Swing music did not include large instrumentation. It was characterized by a walking bass, call and response between musicians, and collective improvisation.

Swing music is a form of popular jazz that originated in the United States in the 1930s and became a dominant musical style during the 1930s and 1940s, characterized by a strong rhythm section and improvisation in a jazz band that plays dance music. It was particularly popular in the big band era when it was the main form of American music for dance events such as ballrooms and nightclubs.

During this era, jazz bands were primarily led by big bands, which featured a larger number of musicians, sometimes including more than twenty players, in contrast to smaller jazz combos. The larger ensembles were required to provide rhythmic and harmonic support for dancing couples, and they were characterized by a powerful rhythm section consisting of drums, bass, and piano or guitar that maintained a solid beat while soloists took turns improvising. Collectively, they made swing music unique and stand out.

For more such questions on Swing music  , Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28213414

#SPJ11

Michelle Alexander, a civil rights lawyer-

Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, argues in the video “Incarceration Nation” that the United States has become a prison state, with over two million people incarcerated and millions more under criminal supervision.

She contends that the War on Drugs and tough-on-crime policies have led to a massive expansion of the criminal justice system, and that this system is racially biased and perpetuates social inequality.

Alexander argues that the criminal justice system perpetuates social inequality by creating a permanent underclass of ex-offenders, who face discrimination in employment, housing, and voting rights.

Ultimately, I agree with Alexander that we need to shift from a punitive to a restorative justice model, one that emphasizes healing and reconciliation rather than punishment and revenge. This will require a major shift in our values and priorities, but I think it is necessary if we want to create a more just and humane society.

Civil rights are individual rights that are sure and safe by the United States Constitution and federal legislation passed by Congress, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

The right to personal security, which includes safe for those who have been accused, and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, and gender are among the most frequent civil rights.

To know more about Civil Rights visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1142564

#SPJ1

Yes, the United States did the right thing by drawing a firm line against Japanese aggression. Japan's expansionist policies threatened regional stability and had devastating consequences for millions of people. The U.S. decision to respond with force helped bring an end to the war and ultimately saved lives. Although the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been the subject of much debate and criticism, it can be argued that it was necessary to bring the war to a swift conclusion and prevent further loss of life. Overall, the U.S. decision to stand up to Japanese aggression played a significant role in shaping the outcome of World War II and the post-war world order.

In the Renaissance, painters were often commissioned to design tapestries.

During the Renaissance, tapestries were a popular form of decorative art and were often used to adorn the walls of wealthy individuals and institutions such as churches and palaces.

While tapestries were traditionally woven, Renaissance painters were often called upon to design the original cartoon or full-scale drawing, that would serve as a guide for the weavers.

This was because painters were considered experts in composition, color, and narrative, and their designs could transform a tapestry from a mere decorative object into a work of art. Some of the most famous Renaissance painters who designed tapestries include Raphael, Michelangelo, and Pieter, Paul Rubens.

Learn more about the Renaissance Painters at

https://brainly.com/question/14341013

#SPJ4

The Mexican revolutionary whose assaults on American citizens and territory provoked a U.S. expedition into Mexico is Pancho Villa.

Francisco "Pancho" Villa was a Mexican revolutionary leader who was known for his military skill and tactics during the Mexican Revolution. Villa was born in 1878 and became a bandit in his early life, robbing and killing wealthy landowners to support the poor. He joined the revolutionary movement in 1910 and became a key figure in the fight against the government of President Porfirio Diaz. However, after the revolution, Villa's relationship with the US deteriorated.

In 1916, Villa led a raid on Columbus, New Mexico, killing 18 Americans. This led to a retaliatory expedition by the US Army under General John Pershing, who pursued Villa into Mexico. The expedition was ultimately unsuccessful in capturing Villa, and the US withdrew from Mexico in 1917. Villa continued to play a role in Mexican politics until his assassination in 1923.

Learn more about mexican revolutionary

https://brainly.com/question/8973812

#SPJ4

Between 1880 and 1914, both feminists and Irish nationalists challenged British liberalism in significant ways.  (Options 1 and 2)

Feminists advocated for women's suffrage and other rights and used various tactics such as protests, civil disobedience, and legal challenges to push for change. Irish nationalists, on the other hand, sought independence from British rule and used a range of tactics such as political organizing, protests, and violence to achieve their goals. Socialists also challenged British liberalism during this period by advocating for workers' rights and pushing for economic reforms.

They used tactics such as strikes, protests, and political organizing to bring attention to issues of social and economic inequality. These groups all challenged the existing power structures and pushed for change in different ways, ultimately contributing to the evolution of British liberalism.

Learn more about liberalism

https://brainly.com/question/27320920

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

It is unclear which "Ridge" is being referred to, as there are several people with that name. However, if we assume that you are referring to the Cherokee writer and leader John Rollin Ridge, who wrote "The Life and Adventures of Joaquin Murieta," then we can attempt to answer your question.

In that novel, Ridge describes a Native American named Joaquin Murieta who becomes educated in the sciences, classics, astronomy, mathematics, and philosophy. Ridge's point in doing so is to challenge the prevailing stereotype of Native Americans as uncivilized and ignorant. By depicting a Native American who is educated in these subjects, Ridge is demonstrating that Native Americans are just as capable of intellectual achievement as people from other cultures.

Furthermore, by showing a Native American character who is educated in a range of subjects that were traditionally associated with Western culture, Ridge is also suggesting that Native Americans can and should participate in the broader cultural and intellectual discourse of the world. In this way, Ridge is advocating for the recognition of Native American intellectual and cultural contributions, and for the integration of Native American perspectives into the broader fabric of human knowledge.

Using Thomas Jefferson as an example, his courage acts had an impact on history because he was one of the principal architects of the American Revolution and the subsequent formation of the United States.

Jefferson was a man of great courage who was not afraid to stand up for his beliefs, even when those beliefs were unpopular. One of his most significant acts of courage was drafting the Declaration of Independence, which declared that the American colonies were no longer subject to British rule and were now free and independent states.

This act set the stage for the American Revolution and ultimately led to the formation of the United States of America. Additionally, Jefferson was a vocal opponent of slavery and advocated for its abolition, even though it was a deeply ingrained institution in American society. His courage in speaking out against slavery helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual abolition of slavery in the United States.

Read more about Thomas Jefferson

brainly.com/question/14242343

#SPJ1

Answer:

Very. Many art works were smashed, destroyed, or shattered.

Explanation:

The Protestant Reformation during the 16th century in Europe almost entirely rejected the existing tradition of Catholic art, and very often destroyed as much of it as it could reach.

Answer:

15. The Gaza Strip, West Bank, and Golan Heights are areas associated

with Israel and what other political entity?

Explanation:

The Gaza Strip and West Bank are associated with the State of Palestine, while the Golan Heights are associated with Syria.

A. We can see here that Christianity builds on the basis of Judaism by sharing many of the same fundamental beliefs, including the belief in one God and the importance of the Ten Commandments.

Judaism is a monotheistic religion and the oldest of the Abrahamic religions, which also include Christianity and Islam. It is based on the belief in one God, who revealed himself to Abraham, Moses, and the Hebrew prophets.

Jesus Christ, who is at the center of the Christian faith, was himself Jewish and his teachings and life were heavily influenced by Judaism.

B. The fact that Virgil's Aeneid uses major structural elements from Homer's works does matter, as it shows the continuity and evolution of literary traditions over time. Virgil was consciously emulating and building on the epic tradition established by Homer, while also adapting it to suit the needs and values of Roman society.

C. The primary cause of the fall of the Roman Empire is a complex and debated topic among historians. Some of the main factors that contributed to the decline and eventual collapse of the Roman Empire include political instability, economic problems, military overexpansion, and the arrival of invading barbarian tribes.

D. Islam developed in the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century AD, when the Prophet Muhammad received divine revelations that formed the basis of the Islamic faith. The religion spread quickly throughout the Arabian Peninsula and beyond, eventually becoming a major world religion with significant cultural and political influence.

Learn more about Judaism on https://brainly.com/question/21757539

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explain ONE economic motivation for developing navigational technology.

Explanation:

One economic motivation for developing navigational technology is to improve transportation and trade routes, which can lead to increased economic growth and prosperity. Before the development of navigational technology, travel by sea was often dangerous and time-consuming, limiting the amount and speed of trade. With improved navigational tools, ships were able to travel further and more efficiently, leading to the expansion of trade routes and the growth of industries such as shipping, fishing, and international trade. Additionally, navigational technology allowed for more accurate maps, making it easier to identify and access new resources and markets. Overall, the development of navigational technology played a significant role in facilitating global economic growth and development.

The difference between Teddy Roosevelt's New Nationalism and Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom is that they were based on different political philosophies and ideology.

1. Teddy Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" and Woodrow Wilson's "New Freedom" were both political philosophies that emerged during the Progressive Era in the United States, but they had different approaches to achieving social and economic reform.

Teddy Roosevelt's New Nationalism was an approach that emphasized the power of the federal government to regulate big business and protect the interests of workers and consumers. Roosevelt believed that government intervention was necessary to ensure fairness and prevent monopolies from dominating the economy. His policies included regulating corporations, protecting workers' rights, and establishing a minimum wage.

On the other hand, Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom focused on breaking up monopolies and promoting competition in the market. Wilson believed that the government's role should be limited to enforcing antitrust laws and protecting individual rights, rather than actively regulating the economy. He advocated for a smaller federal government and supported policies that promoted small businesses and free enterprise.

2. The Election of 1912 had a significant impact on the nation's future because it marked a turning point in the country's political and economic landscape. The election was a four-way race between incumbent Republican President William Howard Taft, Democrat Woodrow Wilson, former President Teddy Roosevelt running on the Progressive Party ticket, and Socialist Eugene V. Debs.

The election highlighted the growing divide between progressives and conservatives in the country, with Roosevelt and Wilson both running on platforms that advocated for major reforms. Roosevelt's New Nationalism and Wilson's New Freedom presented two distinct visions for the future of the country.

Ultimately, Woodrow Wilson won the election and his administration implemented many of the reforms he had advocated for during his campaign. His policies, including the creation of the Federal Reserve System and the Clayton Antitrust Act, had a lasting impact on the nation's economy and helped to shape the regulatory framework that still exists today.

The Election of 1912 also marked the rise of the Progressive movement, which sought to address many of the social and economic problems facing the country at the time. The election paved the way for a new era of reform and government intervention in the economy, which would shape the country's future for years to come.

Learn more on new nationalism here;

https://brainly.com/question/12505404

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

If I had the opportunity to talk to James Madison, I would ask him the following questions:

Why did the Founding Fathers create the Electoral College? How does it work, and why is it important for presidential elections?

I would ask this question because it pertains to Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, which outlines the process for electing the President of the United States. The Electoral College is a controversial topic, and I would be interested to hear Madison's thoughts on why it was included in the Constitution and how it functions.

What was the reasoning behind the division of power between the federal and state governments? Why is this balance of power important for the functioning of our democracy?

This question relates to the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states. It also touches on the concept of federalism, which was a crucial component of the Constitution. Understanding why the Founding Fathers established this division of power is essential for comprehending how our government functions and why certain decisions are made at the federal versus state level.

How do the checks and balances outlined in the Constitution ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful? Can you provide examples of how these checks and balances have played out in practice?

This question pertains to the separation of powers outlined in Articles I, II, and III of the Constitution. The Founding Fathers established this system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from dominating the others. I would be interested to hear Madison's thoughts on how effective this system has been in practice, as well as any examples he could provide of times when one branch of government checked the power of another.

The nation's favourite Founding Father is George Washington, who is known as the "father of the country" and the first president of the United States. Of the individuals usually regarded as America's founding fathers, 39% of Americans rank Washington first.

The main founding fathers were these seven men: James Madison, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Although there were many more that helped in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers.

The Articles of Confederation and the Declaration of Independence were only two of the numerous writings that the U.S. Constitution combined into one magnificent text.

To know more about Founding Father visit:

https://brainly.com/question/455324

#SPJ9

Answer:

Explanation:

The two most powerful city-states in ancient Greece, Athens and Sparta, went to war with each other from 431 to 405. The Peloponnesian War marked a significant power shift in ancient Greece, favoring Sparta, and also ushered in a period of regional decline that signaled the end of what is considered the Golden Age of Ancient Greece.

Answer:

Eric Foner's assertion that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era became the foundation for a new understanding of freedom as access to goods made available by modern capitalism has some validity. The rise of consumerism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries coincided with a period of significant social and economic change, including the growth of industrialization, urbanization, and mass production. As a result, Americans increasingly defined their identities through their consumption habits and the goods they owned.

The availability of consumer goods also became a symbol of progress and prosperity, as it provided access to a wider range of products and services. The desire for material wealth and comfort became a marker of success and an expression of individualism, which was central to the concept of freedom in American society.

However, it is important to note that this understanding of freedom was not universally accepted. Many critics of consumer culture argued that it promoted superficial values and undermined traditional values such as thrift, hard work, and self-reliance. They also argued that the emphasis on consumption perpetuated inequalities and encouraged people to define their worth based on their purchasing power, rather than on their inherent qualities as human beings.

Overall, while the consumer culture of the Progressive Era did contribute to a new understanding of freedom as access to goods made available by modern capitalism, this view was not universally accepted, and remains the subject of ongoing debate.

Explanation:

There is something to get you started ^^

I agree with Eric Foner's view that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era formed the basis for a new understanding of freedom as access to goods provided by modern capitalism. This reflects the shift from producer to consumer society, suggesting that access and consumption of goods has become a critical aspect of freedom.

Yes, I would agree with Eric Foner's assertion that the consumer culture of the Progressive Era laid the groundwork for a new interpretation of freedom as access to the bounty of goods supplied by modern capitalism. This alternative concept of liberty reflects the shift from a society dominated by producers to one dominated by consumers. It suggests that the ability to access and consume goods and services has become an important aspect of freedom.

This aligns with the broader societal shifts that took place during the Progressive Era, a time of rapid industrialization and urbanization. The rise of mass production and advertising during this period, coupled with increased purchasing power, effectively transformed the relationship between citizens and the economy. As a result, people’s access to created goods and services, their choice, and their ability to participate in the market became markers of liberty.

https://brainly.com/question/33499140

#SPJ2

Answer:

Definition of tyrannical in the Definitions.net dictionary. Meaning of tyrannical. What does tyrannical mean? ... regime"; "autocratic government"; "despotic rulers"; "a dictatorial rule that lasted for the duration of the war"; "a tyrannical government" Wiktionary

Explanation:

Guyana and Venezuela were both colonized during the period of "old imperialism" in the Americas. Christopher Columbus claimed Guyana for Spain in 1498, and the Spanish established settlements in the region, but were ultimately unsuccessful in maintaining a permanent presence. The Dutch established a colony in Guyana in the 17th century, which they called Essequibo, and the British also established colonies in the 18th century. Guyana remained a British colony until it gained independence in 1966. Venezuela was also colonized by the Spanish in the 16th century, with a focus on mining gold and silver, but they also established plantations and imported enslaved Africans to work on them. In the early 19th century, Venezuela gained independence from Spain, but struggled with political instability and economic challenges. The histories of both countries reflect the impact of "old imperialism" on these territories, including the exploitation of indigenous peoples, the importation of enslaved Africans, and the establishment of colonial economies based on plantation agriculture. These legacies continue to shape the social, economic, and political landscapes of both countries.

Answer:

Documentary is actual evets that happened, Drama is a made up story that could have happened during that historical time. The documentary is a record of factual events. It is the story of 'something' or the process of 'something'. On the other hand, drama is the imitation of life—a contrived story.

Explanation:

In a documentary, the truth is the story. A historical drama may take a nuanced approach to the truth. It might use a historical period as a backdrop for a story in which historical characters appear and act out fictionalized events.

Answer: Dramas often overexaggerate the facts

while documentaries include all the true and full facts without taking sides

Explanation:

A documentary says it how it is.

Answer:

The Jim Crow Laws were state and local laws in the United States that enforced racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans from the late 1800s until the mid-1960s. These laws had a significant impact on the Civil Rights movement for several reasons:

Legalized segregation: The Jim Crow Laws legalized segregation in all aspects of public life, including schools, public transportation, restaurants, and even restrooms. This created a separate and unequal society, where African Americans were denied basic human rights and opportunities.

Limited political power: The Jim Crow Laws limited the political power of African Americans by implementing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other barriers that prevented them from voting. This effectively silenced their voices and prevented them from advocating for their rights.

Sparked resistance: The Jim Crow Laws sparked resistance and protests from the African American community and their allies. Civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and many others organized boycotts, sit-ins, and other nonviolent demonstrations to challenge these discriminatory laws and demand equal rights.

Led to federal intervention: The Civil Rights movement, fueled by the injustices of the Jim Crow Laws, eventually led to federal intervention. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark pieces of legislation that prohibited discrimination on the basis of race and removed many of the barriers that prevented African Americans from voting.

Overall, the Jim Crow Laws played a significant role in the Civil Rights movement by sparking resistance, highlighting the injustices faced by African Americans, and ultimately leading to significant legislative and social change.

Explanation:

#trust me bro #never wrong #warstep8 i need ur help bro

Answer:

Africa

Explanation:

Oversee daily activities οf the schοοl. οrganize finances and schοοl οperatiοns. Based οn natiοnal curriculum, establish learning οbjectives fοr bοth students and teachers.

Praise their Cοntributiοn and Wοrk. Praise is οne οf the simplest and mοst efficient strategies tο inspire teachers.

Respect, time, and resοurces radiate οut frοm the center οf trust. The grοwth οf trust, teacher efficacy, and schοοl im- prοvident all depend οn each οf these. The staff respοnds with trust when an administratοr instills respect and οffers time, resοurces, and attentiοn. οversee daily activities οf the schοοl. οrganize finances and schοοl οperatiοns, Based οn natiοnal curriculum, establish learning οbjectives fοr bοth students and teachers.

To Know more about staff responds

brainly.com/question/30896788

#SPJ1

The question chosen is:1. Native American reservation education

• Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect Native American education on reservations today?

The federal American Indian policy has had a significant impact on Native American education on reservations. Historically, the federal government has been responsible for providing education to Native American children on reservations through the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE). However, the quality of education provided by BIE schools has been criticized for decades, with concerns about inadequate resources, outdated curriculum, and lack of culturally relevant instruction.

In addition, the federal government's policies of forced assimilation and boarding schools have had a lasting impact on Native American communities and their approach to education. Many Native American families have been hesitant to send their children to BIE schools, which they view as continuing the legacy of forced assimilation.

Overall, the federal American Indian policy continues to affect Native American education on reservations today, with many Native American communities still struggling to provide their children with quality education that is culturally relevant and meets their unique needs.

The general tips on how to self-check the news and get the facts:

   Check the source: Make sure the source is reputable and reliable. Check if the website has a clear editorial policy and if the author of the article is qualified to write on the topic.

   Look for supporting evidence: Check if the article provides supporting evidence, such as links to research studies, data, or quotes from experts.

   Check for bias: Look for any potential bias in the article, such as political or commercial interests. Try to read articles from a variety of sources to get a balanced view.

     Lastly,   Fact-check the information: Use fact-checking websites, such as Snopes or FactCheck.org, to verify the accuracy of the information presented in the article.

Learn more about reservation education from

https://brainly.com/question/15568316

#SPJ1

See text below



Native Americans Today Project

Choose one of the following five topics for your research slide presentation. Make sure your research answers the central question for each topic.

1. Native American reservation education

• Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect Native American education on reservations today?

2. Native American land conflicts

• Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect conflicts over Native American land today?

3. Native American reservation poverty

• Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect poverty on Native American reservations today?

4. Native American public health on reservations

0

Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect public health on Native American reservations today?

5. Native American culture and traditions

• Central Question: How does federal American Indian policy continue to affect Native American culture and traditions today?

Scholar Research Guidance

Read the article "Fake or Real? How to Self-Check the News and Get the Facts" by Wynne Davis on the NPR website.

In addition, use these websites as a starting point for research:

The History Channel

Gilder Lehrman Institute

• Newsela

PBS

CNN

• The Huffington Post

Answer:

It was a process that engendered antagonism among Iran's Sunni neighbors, most notably the Ottoman Empire. The conversion also secured the Twelver sect's supremacy within Shi.ism over the Zaidiyyah and Isma'ilism sects, each of which had previously had eras of power within Shi'ism.

Explanation:

Brainliest pls

Answer:

The Space and Arms race was caused by the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the US. The US invented a nuclear weapon, which would have caused them to lead the war, but then the Soviet Union started to make nuclear weapons. Each time the Soviet Union made one weapon, the US made 2, and then the Soviet Union made 5.

The Space Race started when the Soviet Union sent Sputnik, which was the first artificial satellite. A few weeks later, the US sent the first American Rocket to space.

Advantages of "reasoning from race" by Mayeri include:

The approach recognizes that race is a significant factor in shaping societal structures and experiences, and therefore, it is essential to take it into account in legal decision-making.

By explicitly considering race, the approach can help identify and challenge implicit or explicit racial bias in legal decision-making.

The approach can highlight the impact of laws and policies on marginalized communities, particularly communities of color, and expose the unequal distribution of resources and opportunities.

Disadvantages of "reasoning from race" by Mayeri include:

Reasoning from race can perpetuate stereotypes and essentialize racial identities, which can further marginalize and stereotype individuals and communities.

By solely focusing on race, the approach can overlook the intersectional nature of identities and marginalization.

The approach can be misinterpreted or misused, particularly in the context of identity politics, where the focus on race can be seen as divisive or exclusionary.

The "reason from race" approach can be controversial because it challenges the idea of colorblindness, which suggests that race should not be taken into account in decision-making. Additionally, some may argue that it creates a hierarchy of victimhood, where individuals or communities that experience racial discrimination are seen as more deserving of legal protection than those who experience discrimination based on other factors. Finally, some may argue that it can be divisive and contribute to a "politics of resentment" that fuels tensions between different racial and ethnic groups.

To know more about "reason from race" , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28966612

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Proclamation of 1763 was issued by the British at the end of the French and Indian War to appease Native Americans by checking the encroachment of European settlers on their lands.

The Proclamation Line of 1763 was a British-produced boundary marked in the Appalachian Mountains at the Eastern Continental Divide. Decreed on October 7, 1763, the Proclamation Line prohibited Anglo-American colonists from settling on lands acquired from the French following the French and Indian War.

COVID-19 is the unexpected event and the crisis that defined the era of Donald Trump for better or worse. The correct option is C.

Given the health, economic, and social issues it brings up, the COVID-19 dilemma has governments all over the world functioning in a climate of utter unpredictability and forced to make painful trade-offs. The newly discovered coronavirus turned into a pandemic during the first three months of 2020.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the United States during Trump's presidency, both in terms of public health and the economy. Trump's handling of the pandemic was heavily criticized, and the situation had an impact on his presidency, including his re-election campaign.

Thus, the ideal selection is option C.

Learn more about COVID-19 here:

https://brainly.com/question/30975256

#SPJ2

C. were more politically unified than ever.

The War of 1812, also known as America's "Second War of Independence," was a pivotal moment in American history. Despite the challenges and setbacks faced by the young nation during the conflict, the experience of fighting together against a common enemy served to unify the American people and strengthen their sense of national identity. After the war ended in 1815, Americans emerged with a greater sense of pride and patriotism, and a renewed commitment to defending their young republic from external threats. This newfound political unity helped lay the foundation for the development of a strong, centralized federal government and paved the way for America's emergence as a global superpower in the decades to come.