5(9/12−1/4)+0.5 pls answer correctly

Answer:

When two ratios exhibit the same connection, they are said to be proportionate. Two ratios may be tested for proportionality by writing them as fractions and then reducing them to the smallest possible number. In this case, your ratios are proportionate since the reduced fractions are the same.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps:)

Step-by-step explanation:

the lengths of any line (side, height,...) in A is twice as long as in B.

now, the area of a triangle is

baseline × height / 2

so, two lines are multiplied. that means the factor 2 gets multiplied in 2 times. and that means the area increases by the factor 2×2 = 4

therefore, the area of A is

40.5 × 4 = 162 cm²

Please check the attached images for the answer. Answer with full explanation is screenshoted. Plz refer.

Thanks ☺️

Hope it helps you.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Total length of the track = 630 m

Distance covered by Sweeti by walking = 2/7 of the running track

2/7 of 630 m

⇛ (2/7)×630

⇛ (2×630)/7

⇛ 1260/7

⇛ 180 m

Distance covered by walking = 180 m

Remaining distance =

Total distance - Distance covered by walking

⇛630 m - 180 m

⇛ 450 m

The total distance covered by running by Sweeti is 450 m.

Read more:

Similar Question

You can burn about 450 calories if you run 5 miles. How many miles will you need to run to burn 630 calories? Justify your reasoning.....

https://brainly.com/question/20123561?referrer

Answer:

The last one

Step-by-step explanation:

-4 1/3 is less than -1 3/4 because its farther on the negative side and -1 3/4 is closer to the positive side

Answer:

  186 °F

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference is found by subtracting the smaller from the larger:

  136 -(-50) = 136 +50 = 186

The difference between the two temperatures is 186 °F.

Answer:

4/12 > simplified to > 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps

The ratios that have the same constant of proportionality as Hilary's observation are 4:6 and 8:12.

Hilary's observation states that he needs 2 cups of glue for every 3 cups of water. This can be represented as the ratio 2:3.

Now, let's compare this ratio to the given options:

4:6 = 2:3

Same ratio, same constant of proportionality.

3:6 = 1:2

Different ratio, not the same constant of proportionality.

3:12 = 1:4

Different ratio, not the same constant of proportionality.

8:12 = 2:3

Same ratio, same constant of proportionality.

So, the ratios that have the same constant of proportionality as Hilary's observation are 4:6 and 8:12.

To learn more on Ratios click:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ3

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles A and C are vertical angles; angles B and C are alternate interior angles. Only line 3 of the proof is in error.

The applicable description is found in choice B.

Answer:

72

please mark brainlest

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

7x9=63

63-22=41

41+31= 72

Hope this helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

=> 2x-1/4 + x/3 = 2

=> 3(2x-1) +4x / 12 = 2

=> 6x -3 + 4x = 24

=> 10x = 27

=> x = 2.7

Answer:

x = 27/28

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve 2x-1/4 + x/3 = 2

2x - 1/4 + x/3 = 2

2x + (-1/4) + 1/3x = 2

(2x + 1/3x) + (-1/4) = 2

7/3x + (-1/4) = 2

7/3x = 9/4

3/7 * 7/3x = 3/4 * 9/4

x = 27/28

---------------------

check

2 * 27/28 - 1/4 + 27/28 *1/3 = 2

2 = 2

the answer is good

We can consider that the mean serum protein level of the group of children who received high protein food is different from that of the general population with a normal serum protein value of 7.0g/100ml.

To determine whether the mean serum protein level of the group of 16 children who received high protein food is different from that of the general population with a normal serum protein value of 7.0g/100ml, we can perform a hypothesis test.

Let's denote:

μ1 = Mean serum protein level of the general population (assumed to be 7.0g/100ml)

μ2 = Mean serum protein level of the group fed on high protein food

The null hypothesis (H0) would be that there is no difference between the mean serum protein levels of the two groups:

H₀: μ₁ = μ₂

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that there is a difference between the means:

Hₐ: μ₁ ≠ μ₂

Next, we calculate the sample mean and standard deviation of the group that received high protein food from the given serum protein values.

Assuming the serum protein values (in g/100ml) for the 16 children are as follows:

8.2, 7.6, 7.8, 7.4, 8.0, 7.9, 7.7, 7.5, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1, 7.6, 8.3, 8.0, 7.8, 7.9

Sample mean (x') = (sum of values) / (number of values) = (121.8) / (16) ≈ 7.613 g/100ml

Sample standard deviation (s) ≈ 0.352 g/100ml

Next, we perform a two-sample t-test (assuming equal variances) to compare the means of the two groups. We use the formula:

t = (x'₁ - x'₂) / √[(s₁² / n₁) + (s₂² / n₂)]

where x'₁ and x'₂ are the sample means of the two groups, s₁ and s₂ are the sample standard deviations, and n₁ and n₂ are the sample sizes.

Substituting the values, we get:

t ≈ (7.613 - 7.0) / √[(0.352² / 16) + (0.0² / 16)] ≈ 3.584

Now, we need to find the critical t-value at a given significance level (commonly set at 0.05) and degrees of freedom (df = n1 + n2 - 2). Since we have 16 + 16 - 2 = 30 degrees of freedom, the critical t-value (two-tailed test) is approximately 2.042.

Since the calculated t-value (3.584) is greater than the critical t-value (2.042), we reject the null hypothesis (H0). This means that there is a significant difference between the mean serum protein levels of the two groups.

In conclusion, based on the given data and the hypothesis test, we can consider that the mean serum protein level of the group of children who received high protein food is different from that of the general population with a normal serum protein value of 7.0g/100ml.

To learn more about hypothesis click on,

https://brainly.com/question/33445215

#SPJ4

Binary predictors are simply used to represent dummy variables in regression.

The statement that the nine categories can be coded by nine binary predictors is false.

Binary predictors can only take any of the two binary values (0 and 1).

This means that, the nine categories cannot be represented using binary values or predictors

This is so because, the number of categories (9) is greater than the number of predictors (2).

Hence, the given statement is false

Read more about binary predictors at:

https://brainly.com/question/7361586

Answer:

come, seamen or even spherm

Step-by-step explanation:

basically when the male and female get involved in sexual activity it creates a child through sperm and egg interaction. the fastest sperm wins the race and 68.6% of them are male doctors

Answer:

23518

Step-by-step explanation:

1) the total volume can be calculated as the sum of two volumes (for more info see the picture): V=V₁+V₂, where V₁ belongs to the prisma and V₂ - to the cylinder;

2) V₁=a*b*h; V₁=20*20*37=14800 (m³);

V₂=3/4*(π*r²*h); V₂=3/4*3.1415*100*37≈8717,6625 (m³), note the full volume of the cylinder cannot be included into the result, but 3/4 of its volume;

3) finally, V=14800+8717.6625=23517,6625≈23518 (m³).

Answer:

V = 23518 m3

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of the cube part of building

(20)(20)(37)=14800 cm3

Each cylinder:

h=37/12=3.083 m

r=10 m

[tex]v=\pi (10)^{2} (3.083)=968.66m^{3}[/tex]

all the cylinders:

[tex]v=(12)(968.66)=11,623.89cm^{3}[/tex]

Total volume.

[tex]V=14800+\frac{3}{4} (11,623.89)[/tex]

[tex]V=14800+8717.92=23,517.92[/tex]

nearest m3:

[tex]V=23518m^{3}[/tex]

I hope this help you

Answer:

180

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract the sum of the two angles from 180 degrees.

Answer:

675$

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

8x-20=5x+1

-5       -5

3x=-20+1

+20 +20

3x=21

3  3

x=7

8(7)-20

FED=36

Answer:

its 0.00001

I hope this helps

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y =  bushels of carrots picked

6 = bushels of carrots per hour (rate of change)

x = time worked at picking

2 = initial number of bushels picked before time starts.

My original answer was deleted for "Violating community standards" but I have no idea why my answer ran afoul of the moderator's interpretation of the standard. Also I see no way to protest the action or to learn from my "mistake".

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

- BRAINLIEST answerer

Answer:

(

≤

3

0

)

=

1

−

(

−

3

0

3

6

0

0

⋅

9

0

)

=

1

−

(

−

0

.

7

5

)

Answer:

ok thank u ig

Step-by-step explanation:

Check the picture below.

and let's not forget that the midsegment of a triangle is always half its parallel base.

[tex]\stackrel{midsegment}{AB}=\cfrac{\stackrel{base}{QS}}{2}\implies 16=\cfrac{QS}{2}\implies 32=QS[/tex]

Answer:

1. 0.74 = 74%

4. 0.617 = 61.7

6. 68% = 0.68

9. 175% = 1.75

2. 0.15 = 15%

5. 0.834 = 83.4%

7. 34% = 0.34

10. 200% = 2.00

3. 0.09 = 9%

8. 58.5% = 0.585

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Here you go :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Suppose, for example, we graph the function

f

(

x

)

=

(

x

+

3

)

(

x

−

2

)

2

(

x

+

1

)

3

.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = -9

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve:

-Chetan K

Answer:

[tex]\large\boxed{\boxed{\underline{\underline{\maltese{\pink{\pmb{\sf{\: Solution :- \: x = -9 }}}}}}}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]61 = 7 - 6x\\61 - 7 = - 6x\\54 = -6x\\-\frac{54}{6} = x\\\boxed{- 9 = x}[/tex]

______

Hope it helps!

[tex]\mathfrak{Lucazz}[/tex]