Brainliest to the one thats right
;)

Answer:

4

Explanation:

Shaping a public is easy, but you need a variety of ways.

Answer:

Explanation:

false

Answer:

it would help of you left answer choices lol

Answer: It is A

Explanation:

Answer:

whats ur question

Explanation:

B. Congress

The Constituion provides that an amendment may be propesed by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote.

Answer: I would say congress

Answer:

Whatever its origins, American imperialism experienced its pinnacle from the late 1800s through the years following World War II. During this “Age of Imperialism,” the United States exerted political, social, and economic control over countries such as the Philippines, Cuba, Germany, Austria, Korea, and Japan.

Explanation:

Answer: The first representative government in the colonies.

Explanation: The house of Burgesses was the first form of concreate meeting and gathering place of government in the colonies.

Hope this helps!

To identify the main argument of a text, the central theme and central objective that the author proposes for his text must be taken into account.

An argument is a term to refer to the central axis of the idea that is trying to expose in a text. Arguments must be supported by very strong and seemingly irrefutable ideas and knowledge.

If you need to know what the main argument put forward by Georgia Courier is, you must analyze its text and identify the central theme and purpose of the text. Authors generally state their position on an issue and try to persuade readers through arguments.

Subsequently, you must take the most important ideas and explain their relationship in your own words to make a summary of the text. Also, you can include your opinion about the text.

Note: This question is incomplete because the text is missing. However, I can answer is based on my general prior knowledge.

Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/4233058

Answer:

The Answer is A

Explanation:

police power, in U.S. constitutional law, the permissible scope of federal or state legislation so far as it may affect the rights of an individual when those rights conflict with the promotion and maintenance of the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public

Answer:

The Supreme Court and other federal courts (judicial branch) can declare laws or presidential actions unconstitutional, in a process known as judicial review. By passing amendments to the Constitution, Congress can effectively check the decisions of the Supreme Court.

Answer:Homer Plessy was arrested for being in a train car that was reserved for white people only, and refusing to move.

Explanation:His act of bravery, challenging the state’s Separate Car Act, took him all the way to the Supreme Court – where the courts 1896 decision against him effectively legalised segregation in the US.

ITS OPTIONAL IF YOU WANT TO WRITE THE EXPLANATION

THANKS

              MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Imperial nations

As a result of the Seven Years War (1756–63), one of the most decisive wars of modern times, the French were largely driven out of North America, the Caribbean

Explanation:

Answer:

A. political events

Explanation:

USAtestprep

Answer:

representative democracy

Explanation: we have people show our interest or what we want when we vote or elect representatives .

The difference between Louis XVI and Peter I is that Peter introduced Westernization to Russia, while Louis failed in his attempt to evolve the monarchy of France.

Peter I (1672-1725) was a Russian ruler who ruled between 1682 - 1696. During this period he stood out for belonging to the Romanov Dynasty and implementing a process of modernization through Westernization and expansion that transformed Russia into an of the main European powers.

On the other hand, Louis XVI of France (1754 - 1793) was the last king of monarchical France. He stood out because he wanted to implement government reforms in France such as:

However, these measures caused rejection in the middle and upper class. Later on, his support for the Americans in the war of independence against the United Kingdom caused a waste of money that was evidenced in a wide famine and social discontent that led to the abolition of the monarchy and to be sentenced to death in the guillotine

According to the above, it can be inferred that both rulers had different governments because PeTER was one of the most prominent rulers of Russia, while Louis unleashed an economic crisis that affected his government and led to the abolition of the monarchy.

Learn more about Louis XVI in: https://brainly.com/question/1719168

Answer: settled a debate over representation in Congress.

Explanation:

Representation in a bicameral legislature was established, is best describes the result of the Great Compromise.

Their so-called Great Compromise also known as the Connecticut Compromise after its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, established a dual system of congressional representation. The Great Compromise established the method of legislative representation.

Each state would be assigned a number of seats in the House of Representatives based on its population.

The agreement that established today's system of congressional representation now influences everything from “pork barrel” legislation to how votes in presidential elections are counted in the electoral college.

Therefore, The Great Compromise resulted in the establishment of representation in a bicameral legislature.

Learn more about the Great Compromise, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/4316021

#SPJ6

Answer:

While today we marvel at the extraordinary accomplishment of our Founding Fathers, their own reaction to the US Constitution when it was presented to them for their signatures was considerably less enthusiastic. Benjamin Franklin, ever the optimist even at the age of 81, gave what was for him a remarkably restrained assessment in his final speech before the Constitutional Convention: "…when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men, all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views." He thought it impossible to expect a "perfect production" from such a gathering, but he believed that the Constitution they had just drafted, "with all its faults," was better than any alternative that was likely to emerge.

Nearly all of the delegates harbored objections, but persuaded by Franklin's logic, they put aside their misgivings and affixed their signatures to it. Their over-riding concern was the tendency in nearly all parts of the young country toward disorder and disintegration. Americans had used the doctrine of popular sovereignty--"democracy"--as the rationale for their successful rebellion against English authority in 1776. But they had not yet worked out fully the question that has plagued all nations aspiring to democratic government ever since: how to implement principles of popular majority rule while at the same time preserving stable governments that protect the rights and liberties of all citizens.

Few believed that a new federal constitution alone would be sufficient to create a unified nation out of a collection of independent republics spread out over a vast physical space, extraordinarily diverse in their economic interests, regional loyalties, and ethnic and religious attachments. And there would be new signs of disorder after 1787 that would remind Americans what an incomplete and unstable national structure they had created: settlers in western Pennsylvania rebelled in 1794 because of taxes on their locally distilled whiskey; in western North Carolina there were abortive attempts to create an independent republic of "Franklin" which would ally itself with Spain to insure its independence from the United States; there was continued conflict with Indians across the whole western frontier and increased fear of slave unrest, particularly when news of the slave-led revolution in Haiti reached American shores.

But as fragile as America's federal edifice was at the time of the founding, there was much in the culture and environment that contributed to a national consensus and cohesion: a common language; a solid belief in the principles of English common law and constitutionalism; a widespread commitment (albeit in diverse forms) to the Protestant religion; a shared revolutionary experience; and, perhaps most important, an economic environment which promised most free, white Americans if not great wealth, at least an independent sufficiency.

The American statesmen who succeeded those of the founding generation served their country with a self-conscious sense that the challenges of maintaining a democratic union were every bit as great after 1787 as they were before. Some aspects of their nation-building program--their continuing toleration of slavery and genocidal policies toward American Indians--are fit objects of national shame, not honor. But statesmen of succeeding generations--Lincoln foremost among them--would continue the quest for a "more perfect union."

Such has been our success in building a powerful and cohesive democratic nation-state in post-Civil War America that most Americans today assume that principles of democracy and national harmony somehow naturally go hand-in-hand. But as we look around the rest of the world in the post-Soviet era, we find ample evidence that democratic revolutions do not inevitably lead to national harmony or universal justice. We see that the expression of the "popular will" can create a cacophony of discordant voices, leaving many baffled about the true meaning of majority rule. In far too many places around the world today, the expression of the "popular will" is nothing more than the unleashing of primordial forces of tribal and religious identity which further confound the goal of building stable and consensual governments.

Answer:

Its land; land and sea

i just did the quiz

Explanation:

True

There are still some "old fashioned" people that do not use internet and he only way they keep updated is with the newspaper. But "freedom of the press" does not just limit newspapers, it limits all types of news. Meaning, that everything would have to be regulated or approved, and only approved things could be reported on. So how would we know it isnt "fake news?"

As a result of the rise of privately owned TV networks, European soccer teams were able to demand and make more revenue from competitive bidding.

As a result of private television stations rising:

Thanks to the competition created by other networks rising, soccer teams made money from a bidding process where only the highest bids could show their games.

In conclusion, more private networks meant more money.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/2116629.

Answer:

It was strictly entertainment for the lower classes. By the 1850s, railroads had begun to receive encouragement from the federal government in the form of: Question 13 options: military protection.

Explanation:

Both federal and state governments can impose taxes is an example of federalism

Answer: C- federalism

I hope this helps!

Answer:

C - Federalism

Explanation:

Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national and state governments. The states and the federal government have both exclusive and concurrent powers, which help to explain the negotiation over the balance of power between them.

Answer:

The British blockade prevented weapons and other military supplies from getting through.

Explanation:

Answer:

The blockade barricaded the German coast, Neutral British ports and mined the entire north sea The British blockade prevented weapons and other military supplies from getting through.

Explanation:

Brainliest?

Answer:

Genghis Khan and Timur.

Genghis Khan conquered most places but even though Timur was born after him he had better techniques he conquered places Genghis Khan did NOT conquer. Therefore Genghis Khan had a wheel (I dont know how big) and killed every one taller or is in the height that reached the wheel but when he he enslaved he just used them as maids when he killed them, he either killed them by wrapping them to carpet and ran by horse or as in a casual way by sword. Timur was as merciful so he killed everyone except for women and baby's. When he enslaved them, he used them ( did not treat them as good as Genghis Khan, you get what I mean right? ). When he killed them he boiled them in a ginormous pot, he killed them casually and by horse alike Genghis Khan. Fun fact, he used the male slaves to build the places he is known built ( the one in Central Asia). while others were not so tough when it came to torturing but Europe was there for land mostly and gold as well as peoples languages and items. Americas did not kill as much as Timur and Genghis Khan but they enslaved more.

Explanation:

Volga River is the longest river in Europe.

Answer:

Niceeeee

Never knew thatt

Explanation:

Answer:

The status of the scribes affected who they worked and how much they were paid

Answer:

Jonathan Duncan

Explanation:

In 1791, Jonathan Duncan set up the Sanskrit college.​

In the year 1791, Cornwallis helped Jonathan Duncan to establish the Sanskrit College of Banaras.

Hope this helps :)