complete the following proof

Answer:

time is Y-axis and gallons is x-axis

Answer:

there was 3/4 of a pizza left and gets divided with 8 people

Step-by-step explanation:

The measurement interpretation of the division of the expression ¾ ÷ ⅛ will be 6.

Algebra is the study of algebraic expressions, while logic is the manipulation of those concepts.

The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This rule is used to answer the problem correctly and precisely.

The numbers are given below.

¾ and ⅛

Then the division between the numbers 6 and 1/3 will be given by putting a division sign between them. Then we have

⇒ ¾ ÷ ⅛

⇒ (¾) / (⅛)

⇒ (¾) × (⁸/₁)

⇒ 6

The measurement interpretation of the division of the expression ¾ ÷ ⅛ will be 6.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

Answer:

possible answers include 1:6 and 4:24

Step-by-step explanation:

think of ratios like fractions. you can simplify a fraction by dividing each number by the same factor. 2/12 = 1/6 because you divide the top and bottom by 2. now, you need ANOTHER response. if you can divide the top and bottom you can also multiply. 2/12 now multiply 2 and 12 by 2 and you get 4/24.

Answer:

5×1,000,000,000

Step-by-step explanation:

since 5×1=5

5×1,000,000,000 would be 5,000,000,000

this is what I think and I'm sorry if I'm wrong

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

We alsreadyknow that 37 and 12 is the 2 given lines.  and  The last line is not 37 but pretty close making C the answer.

Answer:

D) 64 In

Step-by-step explanation:

P=12+37+64

Answer:

3 +9 does not belong because it doesn't equal 10 like the rest of them do.

Answer:

Jeffrey grew 1/8 inch more than his brother

Step-by-step explanation:

5/8 - 1/2 = 5/8 - 4/8 = 1/8

Answer:

[tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] [tex]or[/tex] [tex]1.25[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]?[/tex]

[tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] = [tex]0.625[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]0.5[/tex]

[tex]\frac{0.625}{0.5}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex]

[tex]Therefore,[/tex] [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] [tex]is[/tex] [tex]the[/tex] [tex]answer.[/tex]

Hope this helps! <3

Answer:

3.4 miles and 5.472 kilometers

Answeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr:

36

Answer:

376 people

Step-by-step explanation:

25% is 94

to get the there 75% divide 94 by 25% or .25 and you get 376. 25% of that is 94.

Alright i believe the answer is 376, to find the answer we need to find the percent of 1/4 and it is 25% so now i must find how many 25's can fit into the 100% or the whole, in this case 4 can fit into it so now i must multiply 94 * 4 = 376

so i think that is the answer is 376...

I hope this helps!

Answer:

It is 60 hours

Step-by-step explanation: 30 pages = 6 hours

30 × 10 = 300

6 × 10 = 60

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

trust me

Answer:

12:45 PM

Step-by-step explanation:

First, add the time of the math class:

10:15 AM + 1 hour

= 11:15 AM

11:15 AM + 55 minutes

= 12:10 PM

Then, add the time of recess:

12:10 PM + 35 minutes

= 12:45 PM

So, her recess ends at 12:45 PM

Answer:

Recess Ends at 12:45 PM

Step-by-step explanation:

10:15 + 1 hour and 55 minute= 12:10 PM

12: 10+ 35 min= 12:45 PM

Answer:

C) $54.00

Step-by-step explanation:

300*6%*3

300*0.06*3

which is $54.

Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D

Answer:

the  amount paid by the customer for the product is $192.40

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the amount paid by the customer for the product is shown below:

= Total amount + Total amount × tax rate

= ($299 + $10 - $99 - $25) + ($299 + $10 - $99 - $25) × 0.04

= $185 + 185 × 0.04

= $185 + $7.4

= $192.40

Hence, the  amount paid by the customer for the product is $192.40

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

Answer:

-7/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 21.3m

Step-by-step explanation:

The height of the kite of the ground would be calculated as:

We have to calculate the question using a right angled triangle that has angle ACB as 90° while angle CAB will be 40°.

Therefore, the height of the kite would be:

= 30 sin 40 + 2

= 30 (0.6428 ) + 2

= 19.284 + 2

= 21.284 m

= 21.3 m

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Perfect square trinomials, are 2nd degree polynomials, of the form           so that , which can be written as perfect squares.

2. For example

3. Thus  are perfect square trinomials.

4.

5. In the first case -b=20, so b=-20. In the second case, -b=-20, so b=20.

6. b∈{-20, 20}

Answer:

b) 20

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2-20x+100 If you factor it, it would be (x-10)^2

Final Answer: They are all Linear

Steps/Reasons/Explanation:

Question: Which of the following equations are linear?

1. [tex]y = \frac{7}{x}[/tex] Linear

2. [tex]y = 3x + 4[/tex] Linear

3. [tex]3x + 4y = 24[/tex] Linear

Because a linear equation is an equation of a straight line, it means that the degree of a linear equation must be 0 or 1 for each of its variables.

~I hope I helped you :)~

Answer:

yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

r these just free points?

Answer:

hiii

your answer is option c

HOPE IT HELPS YOU OUT PLEASE MARK IT AS BRAINLIEST AND FOLLOW ME PROMISE YOU TO FOLLOW BACK ON BRAINLY.IN

Answer:

I think you can

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think you can take it in the next semester

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The graph shows 3 spaces up every our on the y axis I hope this helped you! im very good at these so I can help is u have more questions! can I have brainliest? I was the first

Answer: 3 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

looking at the graph you have (1,3)  (2,6) and (3,9) and everytime its multiplying by 3... 1x3=3 , 2x3=6, 3x3=9

Therefore, your answer is 3 miles per hour

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution is Option B.

The equation which does not satisfy the relation is 3 ( x + 6 ) = 30

Equations are mathematical statements with two algebraic expressions flanking the equals (=) sign on either side.

It demonstrates the equality of the relationship between the expressions printed on the left and right sides.

Coefficients, variables, operators, constants, terms, expressions, and the equal to sign are some of the components of an equation. The "=" sign and terms on both sides must always be present when writing an equation.

Given data ,

Let the number of x in the diagram be = 3

So , the total number of x = 3x

The sum of the values in the box = 30

So , the equation will be

6 + x + x + x = 30

On simplifying the equation , we get

6 + 3x = 30   be equation (1)

a)

6 + 3x = 30

The equation satisfies

b)

3 ( x + 6 ) = 30

On simplifying the equation , we get

3x + 18 = 30

The equation does not satisfy

c)

3x = 30 - 6

Adding 6 on both sides of the equation , we get

3x + 6 = 30

The equation satisfies

d)

30 = 3x + 6

The equation satisfies

Hence , the equation which does not satisfy the relation is 3 ( x + 6 ) = 30

To learn more about equations click :

https://brainly.com/question/19297665

#SPJ5

Answer:

y=3/2x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

I am pretry sure

Answer: D

Step-by-step explanation:

Graph D shows the car increasing speed over time, then, the flat line shows the car remains at a constant speed. In order for the scenario to apply, there needs to be a line parallel to the x-axis which shows a speed remaining the same over a given amount of time. D is the only graph which has this feature, thus this graph displays the scenario.

Answer:

The other side = 13 feets long

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Scale of drawing : 2 inches represents 5 feets

Area of rectangular room according to scale drawing = 24.96 in²

Length of one side of the room = 12 feets

Length of other side = x

Area of rectangle = Length * width

If :

2 inches = 5 feets

x = 12 feets

x = (12 *2) / 5

x = 4.8 inches

Hence,

For the scaled drawing :

4.8 * width = 24.96

Width = 24.96 / 4.8

Width = 5.2 inches

Converting to feets according to scale:

2 inches = 5 feets

5.2 inches = x feets

x = (5.2 * 5 ) / 2

x = 13 feets

Other side is 13 feets long

Answer:

Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

Fraud                                        Firearm

15.2      9.2                              20.1          15.7

11.2       15.8                             20.4          9.8

7.2         5.2                             13.1           13.5

7.7         4.9                            20.7           23.1

7.4        9.8                            10.4            22.2            

∑ 93.6                                             169                    

Fraud  (X1i)²                                      Firearm(X2j)²

231.04      84.64                           404.01          246.49

125.44      249.64                          416.16          96.04

51.84        27.04                            171.61           182.25

59.29       24.01                            428.49           533.61

54.76        96.04                            108.16           492.84

∑1003.79                                                  3079.66          

We formulate the null and alternative hypothesis as

H0: μ1 - μ2 ≤ 0 i.e. the fraud meantime is less than that for firearms offenses.

Ha: μ1-  μ2  > 0  i.e. the fraud meantime is greater than that for firearms offenses.

We set the significance level at ∝= 0.01

The test statistic, if  H0 is true , is

t=  x1`1- x`2/ Sp√1/n1+ 1/n2

which has a student t- distribution with ν= n1+ n2 -2 = 18 degrees of freedom

The critical region consists of all t- values which are greater than or equal to  t> t(0.01)(18)= 2.522

Computations :

X1`= ∑X1i/n1 = 93.6/10= 9.36

X2`=∑X2j/n2=169/10 = 16.9

∑( X1i- x`1)² = ∑X1i²- (∑X1i)²/n1

= 1003.79 - 876.096/10

= 100.379- 87.6096

=12.7694

∑( X2j- x`2)² = ∑X2j²- (∑X2j)²/n2

= 3079.66 - 28561/10

= 3079.66- 2856.1

=223.56

Sp²= 12.7694+223.56/18= 13.129

Sp = √13.129 =3.623

t= 9.36-16.9/ 3.623√0.1+0.1

t= -7.54/ 1.62

t= -4.654

Conclusion: Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

The meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.