Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Presidential campaigns are publicly funded because candidates raise funds from the public for their campaigns. There are limits on how much each individual can contribute but there are also ways to get around those limits; such as contributions by Political Action Committees (PACs).
Federal financing will allow candidates to compete on equal financial backing. It also avoids PACs' influences on candidates. The disadvantages include the federal government has to provide the financing with money that can be used elsewhere. It also gives the same financial backing to candidates with little chance to win.
Presidential campaigns are publicly funded because candidates raise funds from the public for their campaigns.
How presidential campaigns are funded and what are the pros and cons of federal financing?Presidential campaigns are funded to raise funds from the public for their campaigns. There are limits on how much each individual can contribute but there are also ways to get around those limits; such as contributions by Political Action Committees (PACS). A publicly-funded election is an election funded with money collected through income tax donations or taxes as opposed to private or corporate-funded campaigns. It is a policy initially instituted after Nixon for candidates to opt into publicly funded presidential campaigns via optional donations from tax returns.
The pros of federal financing are it will allow candidates to compete on equal financial backing. It also avoids PACs' influences on candidates. The cons or disadvantages include the federal government has to provide the financing with money that can be used elsewhere.
It also gives the same financial backing to candidates with little chance to win.
Learn more about campaigns, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15992670
#SPJ2
Related Questions
HURRY !!! 100 points!!
Which of the following is NOT a possible verdict following jury deliberations?
A. guilty
B. not guilty
C. delayed decision
D. hung jury
А
B
C
Answers
Answer:
the correct answer is D mate.
Explanation:
hope it helped :)
Among the following is NOT a possible verdict following jury deliberations is a hung jury. Thus the correct option is D.
What are jury deliberations?The jury enters the courtroom after receiving the directions and makes a decision on the case there before delivering its decision. Depending on all the case discussions, this might result in a guilty or not guilty verdict.
Lengthy discussions by a jury usually indicate that there is some debate regarding the alleged victim's guilt or innocence which indicates that the result may be positive.
After a detailed examination but still certain to reach a result, a jury is said to have "hung" in court. A "hung jury" is a jury that could not reach a majority verdict on guilt or innocence because there were insufficient votes in either direction.
Therefore, option D is appropriate.
Learn more about jury deliberations, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10208788
#SPJ2