FILL IN THE BLANK. Intentionally touching another in a harmful or offensive way without legal justification or the consent of that person is a __.

Answer:

The case of Dato ARahman involves allegations of corruption and abuse of power. Here are five investigative functions that would be relevant to this case:

Explanation:

Judiciary is NOT a group mentioned in the lesson that the bureaucracy is accountable to. (B)

The bureaucracy is accountable to the Cabinet, the President, Congress, the public, and interest groups. The judiciary is a branch of government, but the bureaucracy is not directly accountable to it; rather, it is accountable to the executive branch of government, which includes the Cabinet. (B)

The Cabinet is composed of the President and the heads of executive departments, who advise the President and collectively constitute the executive branch of the federal government.

Interest groups are organizations formed to represent citizens and to promote certain goals, and the bureaucracy is accountable to them because they can use their political power to influence public policy.

To know more about Judiciary click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14305259#

#SPJ11

The 24th Amendment helped ensure the right to vote originally granted by the 15th Amendment.

The 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibits the denial of voting rights on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. However, many states continued to use various tactics, such as poll taxes and literacy tests, to prevent African Americans from voting.

The 24th Amendment, ratified in 1964, abolished the use of poll taxes in federal elections. This helped to remove a major barrier to voting for African Americans, as well as other low-income and marginalized groups who were disproportionately affected by poll taxes.

Therefore, while the 23rd Amendment granted residents of the District of Columbia the right to vote in presidential elections, and the 22nd Amendment limited the number of terms a president could serve, neither of these amendments directly addressed voting rights or helped to ensure the right to vote granted by the 15th Amendment.

Learn more about  24th Amendment

https://brainly.com/question/30099782

#SPJ4

The statement "Early nondiscrimination laws failed to give enforcement power to the agencies charged with upholding them" is true.

Nondiscrimination laws were introduced in the early stages, but they did not give enough power to the agencies that were responsible for enforcing them. This left the law useless as it was not being implemented, and the victims of discrimination had no legal backing.

These laws were often overlooked, and violations of them were common. It was not until later that amendments were made to the laws that gave them more power, making them more effective. Therefore, the given statement is true.

To know more about nondiscrimination laws  click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30459697#

#SPJ11

Answer:

What is Democratic system

Assuming that print today's data is a function with no parameters, the statement that calls this function is: print_todays_date()

In programming, a function is a block of code that performs a specific task. Functions are often used to break down a program into smaller, more manageable pieces of code that can be reused throughout the program.

When you define a function, you give it a name and a set of parameters (if any) that it takes as input. In the case of the "print today's date" function, it doesn't take any parameters, so you can simply write the name of the function followed by a set of empty parentheses, like this: print_todays_date().

Find out more on functions at https://brainly.com/question/14574668

#SPJ1

The rapid growth of urban areas has resulted in many challenges, one of which is the increasing proximity between people and wild animals.

As cities expand and new suburbs are built, they often encroach on the habitats of wild animals. As a result, animals such as deer, coyotes, and raccoons are often found living in close proximity to humans. This can be particularly problematic for both people and animals. Wild animals can be a threat to human safety, particularly if they become aggressive or attack humans. On the other hand, people can also be a threat to wild animals, either intentionally or unintentionally.

For example, they may kill animals that they perceive as pests or encroach on their habitats. Moreover, the increasing proximity between people and wild animals can also increase the spread of diseases. Overall, it is crucial for policymakers to find ways to balance the needs of humans and wild animals in urban areas to minimize potential conflicts and protect both groups.

To know more about urban areas , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/4028801

#SPJ1

The given statement "maquiladoras are foreign-owned manufacturing plants allowed to operate in Mexico with special privileges in return for employing Mexican citizens." is true as maquiladoras are foreign businesses that operate in Mexico with advantages in return for hiring Mexicans.

A maquiladora is a manufacturing facility or plant in Mexico. According to a 1989 decree, the Secretariat of Commerce and Industrial Development of the nation has given these corporations permission to operate. They are owned by overseas companies.

Maquiladoras were first created in the 1960s to combat unemployment and promote foreign investment. They typically operate close to the border with Mexico. Businesses that use the maquiladora model can benefit from a wide range of advantages. Typically, the manufactured goods are exported all the way to the Mexican border and beyond.

Learn more about maquiladora at:

brainly.com/question/30791749

#SPJ4

Answer:

This is because you can invoke your rights at any time. This means that after invoking your rights, any incriminating statements you made after will be inadmissible as evidence. A person may still invoke their right to remain silent or right to an attorney even after they have agreed to answer the officer's questions.

Minimum age of 35 is a necessary qualification for anyone wishing to be president of the united states. The correct option is A.

A person cannot hold the office of president unless they were a natural-born citizen or a citizen of the United States at the time this Constitution was adopted. Additionally, a person cannot hold this office if they have not reached the age of 35 and have not lived in the country for 14 years.

The President must be a natural-born citizen, at least 35 years old, and have lived in the United States for at least 14 years, according to the Qualifications Clause in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Constitutional Conditions for Presidential Candidates in the United States, being a citizen of the United States by birth, to be 35 years of age minimum have resided in the US for the past 14 years. The correct option is A.

The question is incomplete, complete question "which of the following is a necessary qualification for anyone wishing to be presdient of the united states? A. minimum age of 35 B. member of congress C. Vice President D. in a primary election or party convention"

Learn more about president at:

brainly.com/question/11616771

#SPJ4

The public was to be served by the press, not the authorities. A democracy in which the government is answerable to the people depends on the press freedom, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment.

Independent, reputable, and ethical media are the foundation of any democracy. They serve to educate, critique, and arouse discussion.

Democracy is a system of government in which the populace has the power to decide legislation ("direct democracy") or to elect representatives to do so ("representative democracy").

To know more about press visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28209688

#SPJ1

The tasks that a security administrator should complete during the ongoing operations phase are as follows: Conduct periodic vulnerability assessments and Verify compliance with the IA documents. Let's discuss both tasks in detail below.

Periodic vulnerability assessments: Vulnerability assessments are conducted to identify and manage potential vulnerabilities within an IT infrastructure or system. It is a proactive approach that allows the organization to assess its security posture and improve it.

Periodic vulnerability assessments should be conducted by a security administrator to ensure that both organizations' systems and data are secure and there is no unauthorized access. The frequency of conducting these assessments depends on the nature and sensitivity of the data shared between the organizations.Verify compliance with the IA documents: The interoperability agreement (IA) is a document that outlines the terms and conditions of the partnership between the organizations. Compliance with the IA documents ensures that both parties are following the rules and regulations set forth in the agreement.

A security administrator should ensure that the partner organization is following the IA documents and all the security measures are in place to safeguard the data shared between them. In case of any non-compliance, the security administrator should take necessary steps to mitigate the risk and bring the partner organization back into compliance. Therefore, the correct answer is B and C, which are Conduct periodic vulnerability assessments and Verify compliance with the IA documents, respectively.

To know more about Periodic vulnerability assessments refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30001396#

#SPJ11

Routine activities theory suggests that for a crime to occur, three necessary factors must be present: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of a capable guardian.

These factors create opportunities for crime to occur, and their absence makes it less likely. However, the theory does not suggest that a specific individual or group of individuals is responsible for the occurrence of a crime. Instead, it focuses on the environmental and situational factors that create opportunities for criminal activity. Therefore, the identity of the potential offender is not a necessary factor in the theory.

To know more about crime click here:

brainly.com/question/9997722

#SPJ4

Restorative justice is the type of punishment that advocates repairing the losses of the victims and the community while simultaneously trying to connect the offender to society. Option (b) is the correct answer.

Retributive justice: Retributive justice is the punishment of criminals, which includes imprisonment or fines as a consequence of a crime.

Its goal is to deter the individual from committing crimes in the future by making him or her fearful of the punishment that would follow.

Restorative justice: Restorative justice, on the other hand, emphasizes repairing the injury and reestablishing communication between the offender and the victim.

This helps in maintaining healthy relations in society. Reconstructive justice: Reconstructive justice is a system that emphasizes improving society's overall framework to prevent individuals from committing criminal acts in the first place.

Restrictive justice: Restrictive justice is a type of punishment where the offender is confined and kept away from society. The punishment is in the form of imprisonment, probation, or parole, and it intends to ensure that the offender does not engage in criminal activities again.

To know more about Restorative justice refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28913925#

#SPJ11

The defendant in a product liability case based on strict liability could argue that the user was careless or misused the product to limit the dollar amount of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Hence, Option c is the correct.

Product liability is a legal term used to describe the liability of manufacturers and sellers for injuries caused by a product's design, production, and marketing. There are three theories under which a plaintiff can bring a product liability lawsuit: negligence, breach of warranty, and strict liability.

In a product liability case based on strict liability, the defendant might claim that the plaintiff was careless or misused the product. This can be argued to reduce the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff.

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that imposes liability on a party without requiring proof of fault. In product liability cases, it means that a manufacturer or seller is strictly liable for any injuries caused by a defective product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not.

Hence, Option c is the correct.

Learn more about Product liability here:

brainly.com/question/30830242

#SPJ11

The prior restraint is the legal censorship or restriction on speech, expression, or other forms of public communication.

An example of a situation in which the government could use prior restraint against the press is a case of a national security breach or an invasion of privacy. Prior restraint is also used in cases of a criminal investigation. In this situation, if a newspaper or television channel has some valuable information about an ongoing investigation, the government may have to use prior restraint to stop the channel or the newspaper from publishing the information so that it won’t hinder the investigation process.

This situation usually happens in cases of political assassination or terrorism, where the government does not want the culprits to know the ongoing investigation process. Therefore, the government is forced to use prior restraint against the press to stop them from publishing sensitive information. The government also uses prior restraint to protect the privacy of individuals. If a newspaper or television channel has information about a person's personal life that could damage their reputation, the government can use prior restraint to stop them from publishing such information.

To learn more about Restriction :

https://brainly.com/question/30785618

#SPJ11

The first question is about unlawful declaration of State of Emergency; the rest are related to legal proceedings and ethics.

(1) What can one do when the Governor unlawfully declares a State of Emergence? Secondly, pick and describe a scenario in which the Governor can legally declare a State of Emergency.

If the Governor unlawfully declares a State of Emergency, individuals can challenge the declaration in court through a lawsuit. They can argue that the Governor exceeded his/her legal authority, and therefore the declaration should be deemed invalid.

(2) Explain the requirements necessary for reasonable suspicion, probable cause, and beyond a reasonable doubt, and provide an example of when each is required.

Reasonable suspicion is a standard required for police officers to conduct a brief, investigatory stop of an individual. It is based on specific, articulable facts that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, provide reasonable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime. An example of when reasonable suspicion is required is when a police officer observes an individual acting suspiciously in a high-crime area and stops them for questioning.

(3)What does it mean to sustain an objection? What does it mean to overrule an objection?

To sustain an objection means that the judge agrees with the objection raised by a party, and therefore the objection is accepted. The judge will usually instruct the jury to disregard the evidence or testimony that was the subject of the objection.

To overrule an objection means that the judge disagrees with the objection raised by a party, and therefore the objection is rejected. The evidence or testimony that was the subject of the objection is allowed to be presented to the jury.

(4) You are representing Kevin, a Firestone State Trooper, in a civil case. The plaintiff, Sarah, is alleging that your client falsely arrested her for an offense she did not commit. During discovery, Sarah presents only a picture of the arrest record from the database. Given that Sarah is not alleging that she was overtimed, what motion could you make during pre-trial and what grounds should you use for the motion? What standards would you have to meet for the motion to be accepted?

You could make a motion for summary judgment during pre-trial, arguing that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that Kevin is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The grounds for the motion would be that Sarah has presented no evidence beyond the arrest record to support her claim of false arrest.

Learn more about testimony :

https://brainly.com/question/29244222

#SPJ1

According to the US government, the official retirement age is 67 years for those born in 1960 or later.

However, it varies for those born before 1960. In the United States, the retirement age was established with the Social Security Act of 1935. The original retirement age was set at 65 years. But with the passage of time and growing longevity, the retirement age has been adjusted. The government's aim is to ensure that retirees have enough savings to last for the rest of their lives without being dependent on the government. It is also recommended that individuals start saving for retirement as early as possible to ensure they have sufficient funds for their retirement years.

The United States government offers several retirement plans, including Social Security, which is a social insurance program funded by payroll taxes. Medicare, the government's health insurance program for seniors, is another option that individuals can choose to enroll in.

To learn more about Government :

https://brainly.com/question/30775846

#SPJ11

In 1873, the congressional law that officially discontinued silver coinage became known to critics as the "Crime of '73." The act, also known as the Coinage Act of 1873, ended the circulation of silver dollars, half dollars, and quarter dollars.

It was a controversial law because it had long-lasting implications for the US monetary system and the country's economy. The Coinage Act of 1873 played a significant role in shaping the country's monetary system. It was instrumental in ending the bimetallism era, which allowed gold and silver to be used interchangeably as a currency. The law put the US on the gold standard, which meant that the country's currency was tied to gold.

The gold standard was a crucial factor in stabilizing the US economy in the late 19th century, but it had its drawbacks too, particularly during economic crises. The passage of the Coinage Act of 1873 created much controversy in the United States, and it is still considered a significant moment in US monetary history. Those who opposed the law saw it as a conspiracy to deprive people of their right to use silver as a currency. As a result, it became known as the "Crime of '73."

To learn more about Congressional law :

https://brainly.com/question/30837088

#SPJ11

The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) is a federal law that regulates the surface mining of coal in the United States.

The law was designed to address the negative effects coal mining has on the environment and society, including erosion, habitat damage, and air and water pollution.

The law puts rigorous regulations on mining activities, such as the reclamation of land when mining is finished, and requires mining operations to get permission from the state in which they are working.

The law also stipulates that mining operations must pay a reclamation charge, which goes towards cleaning up and restoring mined-out land.

To know more about federal law,

https://brainly.com/question/25912245

#SPJ4

The answer is option b. The percentage of women has doubled since the 1970s but females still only comprise 12%.

This statement is true regarding changing profile of a police officer.

Police, a group of policemen who serve as the government's civil service. Police are generally in charge of doing law and order, protecting the public, and stopping, identifying, and looking into illegal activity. Policing is the term used to show these activities.

Investigation, capture, and custody of those accused of committing crimes are among the main responsibilities of law enforcement.

To know more about Police visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24655820

#SPJ1

If people are to form authentic and rational attitudes about public policies and leaders they require accurate and insightfully interpreted political information. The correct answer is B.

A wide range of activities that people engage in as part of political participation allow them to form and express their opinions on the world and its governance as well as attempt to influence the decisions that have an impact on their lives. Political liberty refers to fundamental rights that are necessary for the majority's formation, expression, and transformation into public policy. Information sharing, relationship building, acting ability development, and maintaining or changing conditions are some of the goals of citizen participation. Different levels of power can be used by citizens to accomplish these goals.  The correct answer is B.

The question is incomplete, complete question "If people are to form authentic and rational attitudes about public policies and leaders they require which of the following?

A. freedom of religious beliefs

B. accurate and insightfully interpreted political information

C. narrowly framed interpretations of political events

D. continuous polling by public officials to find out political attitudes"

Learn more about public policies at:

brainly.com/question/14616070

#SPJ4

Answer:

Mala prohibita are crimes that are illegal only because they are prohibited by law, rather than being inherently immoral. Examples include traffic violations, drug offenses, white-collar crimes, gambling offenses, firearms offenses, prostitution and sex-related crimes, alcohol-related offenses, intellectual property offenses, immigration offenses, and environmental offenses.

Examples:

Defamation is NOT one of the elements of a libel suit.  (C)

Libel is a type of defamation that consists of false statements that are published in a written form. A libel suit requires four elements: identification, clear and present danger, fault, and injury. Identification means that the individual responsible for the libelous statement must be identified.

Clear and present danger means that the statement was false, and it created harm or the potential to cause harm. Fault means that the person who made the statement either acted negligently or with intentional malice. Injury means that the libelous statement caused some form of harm or damage to the plaintiff.

To know more about Defamation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28196525#

#SPJ11

The TRIPS agreement is based on the notion that inadequate protection of intellectual property the incentive for innovation reduces.

The TRIPS Agreement mandates that all inventions, whether processes or products, in all fields of technology be eligible for patent protection, subject to the usual requirements of novelty, inventiveness, and industrial applicability.

The TRIPS Agreement specifies how databases must be protected under copyright and guarantees that computer programs will be treated as literary works under the Berne Convention. It also broadens the scope of international copyright regulations to include rental rights.

The TRIPS Agreement established a minimum standard of protection for the intellectual property of other WTO Members that Members must offer. Copyrights, trademarks, patents, geographical indications (GI), industrial and layout designs, and undisclosed information (trade secrets) are just a few of the topics it covers.

Learn more about TRIPS Agreement at:

brainly.com/question/30721391

#SPJ4

For this activity, I have chosen the following two texts:

Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success

The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace

In the text "Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success," the author emphasizes the importance of developing a wide range of business skills to succeed in the workplace. According to the author, the most important business skills include communication, teamwork, problem-solving, time management, and adaptability. The author suggests that individuals need to continuously learn and develop these skills in order to succeed in their desired jobs.

On the other hand, "The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace" article focuses on the top skills that are in demand in the modern workplace. The author identifies skills such as digital literacy, critical thinking, creativity, emotional intelligence, and cross-cultural competency as being essential in today's job market. The author argues that these skills are crucial for individuals to remain competitive in the fast-changing job market.

While both articles emphasize the importance of certain skills in the workplace, they differ in the skills that they prioritize. "Most Important Business Skills for Workplace Success" emphasizes the importance of soft skills such as communication and problem-solving, while "The Top Skills for the Modern Workplace" highlights the importance of technical skills such as digital literacy and critical thinking.

The conflicting views in these articles may be due to differences in interpretation and perspective. For example, the first article may be more geared towards individuals seeking to develop their overall business acumen, while the second article may be more focused on the skills required for success in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

From these texts, it can be inferred that both soft skills and technical skills are crucial for success in the workplace. Employers are looking for individuals who possess a combination of technical and soft skills, and it is essential for individuals to continuously develop and improve their skills in order to remain competitive in the job market.

In conclusion, both articles provide valuable insights into the skills necessary for success in the workplace. While they differ in their prioritization of certain skills, they both highlight the importance of continuous learning and skill development. By combining both technical and soft skills, individuals can position themselves for success in the modern job market.