help please and thank you

Answer:

If point C lies between two points A and B such that AC=BC, then point C is the bisector of A and B, that means it is at right the centre.

Answer:

the answer is 36+14/25=36.56

Answer:

A) 10/11

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the odds of the team winning are 1/11, the odds of not winning have to be 10/11 in order for it to add to 11/11.

Answer:

2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5/2

Step-by-step explanation:

To divide fractions, you flip the second fractions and change it to multiplication.

(3/2) / (3/5) =

(3/2) x (5/3)

To multiply them, you just multiply their numerators together to get the new numerator and multiply the denominators together to get the new denominator.

(3/2) x (5/3) =

(3 x 5) / (2 x 3) =

15/6

This can be reduced to:

5/2

Answer:

376 people

Step-by-step explanation:

25% is 94

to get the there 75% divide 94 by 25% or .25 and you get 376. 25% of that is 94.

Alright i believe the answer is 376, to find the answer we need to find the percent of 1/4 and it is 25% so now i must find how many 25's can fit into the 100% or the whole, in this case 4 can fit into it so now i must multiply 94 * 4 = 376

so i think that is the answer is 376...

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

r these just free points?

Answer:

possible answers include 1:6 and 4:24

Step-by-step explanation:

think of ratios like fractions. you can simplify a fraction by dividing each number by the same factor. 2/12 = 1/6 because you divide the top and bottom by 2. now, you need ANOTHER response. if you can divide the top and bottom you can also multiply. 2/12 now multiply 2 and 12 by 2 and you get 4/24.

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

We alsreadyknow that 37 and 12 is the 2 given lines.  and  The last line is not 37 but pretty close making C the answer.

Answer:

D) 64 In

Step-by-step explanation:

P=12+37+64

Answer:

199

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in x=19.6, then

g(19.6) = 10 * 19.6 +3= 199

Answer:

scalene

Step-by-step explanation:

no sides are the same

Answer:

5×1,000,000,000

Step-by-step explanation:

since 5×1=5

5×1,000,000,000 would be 5,000,000,000

this is what I think and I'm sorry if I'm wrong

Answer:

when you divide 3/4 by 1/8 you get 6

Answer:

It would be a I think

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Final Answer: They are all Linear

Steps/Reasons/Explanation:

Question: Which of the following equations are linear?

1. [tex]y = \frac{7}{x}[/tex] Linear

2. [tex]y = 3x + 4[/tex] Linear

3. [tex]3x + 4y = 24[/tex] Linear

Because a linear equation is an equation of a straight line, it means that the degree of a linear equation must be 0 or 1 for each of its variables.

~I hope I helped you :)~

Answer:

12:45 PM

Step-by-step explanation:

First, add the time of the math class:

10:15 AM + 1 hour

= 11:15 AM

11:15 AM + 55 minutes

= 12:10 PM

Then, add the time of recess:

12:10 PM + 35 minutes

= 12:45 PM

So, her recess ends at 12:45 PM

Answer:

Recess Ends at 12:45 PM

Step-by-step explanation:

10:15 + 1 hour and 55 minute= 12:10 PM

12: 10+ 35 min= 12:45 PM

stupid thin wont load

Answer:

It is 60 hours

Step-by-step explanation: 30 pages = 6 hours

30 × 10 = 300

6 × 10 = 60

Answer:

60

Step-by-step explanation:

trust me

Answer:

The other side = 13 feets long

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Scale of drawing : 2 inches represents 5 feets

Area of rectangular room according to scale drawing = 24.96 in²

Length of one side of the room = 12 feets

Length of other side = x

Area of rectangle = Length * width

If :

2 inches = 5 feets

x = 12 feets

x = (12 *2) / 5

x = 4.8 inches

Hence,

For the scaled drawing :

4.8 * width = 24.96

Width = 24.96 / 4.8

Width = 5.2 inches

Converting to feets according to scale:

2 inches = 5 feets

5.2 inches = x feets

x = (5.2 * 5 ) / 2

x = 13 feets

Other side is 13 feets long

Answer:

Jeffrey grew 1/8 inch more than his brother

Step-by-step explanation:

5/8 - 1/2 = 5/8 - 4/8 = 1/8

Answer:

[tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] [tex]or[/tex] [tex]1.25[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] ÷ [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]?[/tex]

[tex]\frac{5}{8}[/tex] = [tex]0.625[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = [tex]0.5[/tex]

[tex]\frac{0.625}{0.5}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex]

[tex]Therefore,[/tex] [tex]\frac{5}{4}[/tex] [tex]is[/tex] [tex]the[/tex] [tex]answer.[/tex]

Hope this helps! <3

Answer:

Not sure if this is a typo but

48% of 199=95.52

48% of 1990=955.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 95.52.

Explanation: First take 199 then do times 48, then you'd get 95.52. Hope that helps!

Answer:

-7/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

92 canım

Step-by-step explanation:

Anlamadıysan geri sorarsın ve yorumumu beğenirsin tmm mi what iş kaçıncı sınıf taşan bana söyle

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

statment/reason

1) HK≅JK / given (S)

2) IK bisects ∠HKJ / given

3) ∠3≅∠4 / angle bisectors form congruent angles (A)

4) HK≅JK / given

5) IK ≅IK / reflexive propriety (S)

6) ΔIHK≅ΔIJK / SAS theorem of congruency

7) ∠1≅∠2 / corsponding parts of congruent Δs are ≅

8) IK bisects ∠HIJ / angle bisectors form congruent angles

Answer:

there was 3/4 of a pizza left and gets divided with 8 people

Step-by-step explanation:

The measurement interpretation of the division of the expression ¾ ÷ ⅛ will be 6.

Algebra is the study of algebraic expressions, while logic is the manipulation of those concepts.

The acronym PEMDAS stands for Parenthesis, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, and Subtraction. This rule is used to answer the problem correctly and precisely.

The numbers are given below.

¾ and ⅛

Then the division between the numbers 6 and 1/3 will be given by putting a division sign between them. Then we have

⇒ ¾ ÷ ⅛

⇒ (¾) / (⅛)

⇒ (¾) × (⁸/₁)

⇒ 6

The measurement interpretation of the division of the expression ¾ ÷ ⅛ will be 6.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

Answer:

I think you can

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think you can take it in the next semester

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

The recursive formula of a geometric sequence is

[tex]a_n=a_{n-1}\cdot (\dfrac{1}{8})[/tex]

[tex]a_1=-3[/tex]

To find:

The explicit formula of the given geometric sequence.

Solution:

We know that, first term of geometric sequence is [tex]a_1=-3[/tex].

Recursive formula of a geometric sequence is

[tex]a_n=a_{n-1}\times r[/tex]      ...(i)

where, r is common ratio.

We have,

[tex]a_n=a_{n-1}\cdot (\dfrac{1}{8})[/tex]    ...(ii)

On comparing (i) and (ii), we get

[tex]r=\dfrac{1}{8}[/tex]

The explicit formula of a geometric sequence is

[tex]a_n=a_1r^{n-1}[/tex]

Putting [tex]a_1=-3[/tex] and [tex]r=\dfrac{1}{8}[/tex], we get

[tex]a_n=-3\left(\dfrac{1}{8}\right)^{n-1}[/tex]

Therefore, the correct option is D.

Answer:

3 +9 does not belong because it doesn't equal 10 like the rest of them do.

Answer:

Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

Step-by-step explanation:

Fraud                                        Firearm

15.2      9.2                              20.1          15.7

11.2       15.8                             20.4          9.8

7.2         5.2                             13.1           13.5

7.7         4.9                            20.7           23.1

7.4        9.8                            10.4            22.2            

∑ 93.6                                             169                    

Fraud  (X1i)²                                      Firearm(X2j)²

231.04      84.64                           404.01          246.49

125.44      249.64                          416.16          96.04

51.84        27.04                            171.61           182.25

59.29       24.01                            428.49           533.61

54.76        96.04                            108.16           492.84

∑1003.79                                                  3079.66          

We formulate the null and alternative hypothesis as

H0: μ1 - μ2 ≤ 0 i.e. the fraud meantime is less than that for firearms offenses.

Ha: μ1-  μ2  > 0  i.e. the fraud meantime is greater than that for firearms offenses.

We set the significance level at ∝= 0.01

The test statistic, if  H0 is true , is

t=  x1`1- x`2/ Sp√1/n1+ 1/n2

which has a student t- distribution with ν= n1+ n2 -2 = 18 degrees of freedom

The critical region consists of all t- values which are greater than or equal to  t> t(0.01)(18)= 2.522

Computations :

X1`= ∑X1i/n1 = 93.6/10= 9.36

X2`=∑X2j/n2=169/10 = 16.9

∑( X1i- x`1)² = ∑X1i²- (∑X1i)²/n1

= 1003.79 - 876.096/10

= 100.379- 87.6096

=12.7694

∑( X2j- x`2)² = ∑X2j²- (∑X2j)²/n2

= 3079.66 - 28561/10

= 3079.66- 2856.1

=223.56

Sp²= 12.7694+223.56/18= 13.129

Sp = √13.129 =3.623

t= 9.36-16.9/ 3.623√0.1+0.1

t= -7.54/ 1.62

t= -4.654

Conclusion: Since the computed value of t= -4.654 does not fall in the critical region we therefore accept the null hypothesis . We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indicate a difference in the means time served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.

The meantime served for fraud is less than that for firearms offenses.