help pls! Imagine someone you know was arrested for speaking out against World War I. You want to write a letter to your local newspaper to protest the Sedition Act. Of course, the post office may refuse to deliver your letter. And if it is published, you risk being arrested yourself.

1. what would you say in your letter to the newspaper?

2. now imagine you are the editor of the paper that receives a letter like this if you want to print it you’ll be arrested to your family and friends may have to answer questions from the police what would you do?

Answer:

Those opposed to the development of political parties believed that political parties were a threat to the government and that they could divide our country by discriminating against minorities.

On the other side, there were many who were completely in favor of the development of political parties, based on the notion that people will naturally dispute on matters. Furthermore, they were well aware that people who shared similar viewpoints should band together.

Explanation:

Answer:

Not a lot becouse that was a long ago.

Answer:

The Bill of Rights of the US Constitution protects basic freedoms of United States citizens. ... The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the freedom of assembly and the freedom to petition.

Explanation:

Answer:

Give me 1 star if this didn't help.

Explanation:

On July 4, 1776, the United States Congress approved the Declaration of Independence. Its primary author, Thomas Jefferson, wrote the Declaration as a formal explanation of why Congress had voted on July 2 to declare independence from Great Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War, and as a statement announcing that the thirteen American Colonies were no longer a part of the British Empire. Congress issued the Declaration of Independence in several forms. It was initially published as a printed broadsheet that was widely distributed and read to the public.

Philosophically, the Declaration stressed two themes: individual rights and the right of revolution. These ideas became widely held by Americans and spread internationally as well, influencing in particular the French Revolution.

Written during the summer of 1787 in Philadelphia, the Constitution of the United States of America is the fundamental law of the US federal system of government and the landmark document of the Western world. It is the oldest written national constitution in use and defines the principal organs of government and their jurisdictions and the basic rights of citizens.

The first ten amendments to the Constitution—the Bill of Rights—came into effect on December 15, 1791, limiting the powers of the federal government of the United States and protecting the rights of all citizens, residents and visitors in American territory.

The Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the freedom of assembly and the freedom to petition. It also prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, cruel and unusual punishment and compelled self-incrimination. Among the legal protections it affords, the Bill of Rights prohibits Congress from making any law respecting establishment of religion and prohibits the federal government from depriving any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law. In federal criminal cases it requires indictment by a grand jury for any capital offense, or infamous crime, guarantees a speedy public trial with an impartial jury in the district in which the crime occurred, and prohibits double jeopardy.

Answer:

When slavery ended in the United States, freedom still eluded African Americans who were contending with the repressive set of laws known as the black codes. Widely enacted throughout the South following the Civil War—a period called Reconstruction—these laws both limited the rights of Black people and exploited them as a labor source.

In fact, life after bondage didn’t differ much from life during bondage for the African Americans subjected to the black codes. This was by design, as slavery had been a multi-billion dollar enterprise, and the former Confederate states sought a way to continue this system of subjugation.

“They may have lost the war, but they’re not going to lose power civically and socially,” says M. Keith Claybrook Jr., an assistant professor in the Department of Africana Studies at California State University, Long Beach. “So, the black codes were an attempt to restrict and limit freedom.”

Losing the Civil War meant the South had little choice but to recognize the Reconstruction-era policies that abolished slavery. By using the law to deny African Americans the opportunities and privileges that white people enjoyed, however, the one-time Confederacy could keep these newly liberated Americans in virtual bondage.

(source: https://www.history.com/news/black-codes-reconstruction-slavery)

Answer:

When done well, standardization can decrease ambiguity and guesswork, guarantee quality, boost productivity, and increase employee morale. Some benefits of standardization are as follows: Improves clarity — because a standard process will eliminate the need for guesswork or extra searching.

Explanation:

The process of standardization helps sailors traffic a lot of things as well as provides a sturdy structure that would be feasible in a long run.

In order to standardise a specific sector, standards-based and comparable technology and procedures must be developed, promoted, and perhaps mandated.

The creation of a new product can impose requirements on the calibre and uniformity of a technology and guarantee its scalability, portability, and health.

The feasibility of the particular structure helps in proper management as well as a proper sturdiness is provided.

As a result of its ability to speed up the process and its facilitation of the dissemination of ground-breaking concepts and cutting-edge technical information, standardization also promotes innovative thinking.

Learn more about standardization, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9208082

#SPJ5

After the Qin dynasty (221-207 BC), the Han dynasty (202 BC – 220 AD) was China's second imperial dynasty.

Eastern Han's capital was Luoyang, whereas Western Han's was Chang'an. The emperor presided as the top executive officer, was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and oversaw the administration of all written laws.

Confucian officials frequently served as local authorities. They frequently worked as landowners and tax collectors and acted as a conduit between the common people and the Emperor.

A massive bureaucracy was used by the Han to rule their empire. They possessed, among other things, departments for public works, finance, the military, and crime and justice. There was a chief minister and numerous lower-level officials in each department.

Chinese historians have devoted more thanIt took a millennium to discover the causes of the Han Dynasty's demise. They eventually came up with three primary hypotheses: 1) poor leadership; 2) the influence of empresses and court eunuchs over child emperors too young to rule independently; and 3) the Yellow Turban Revolt.

Learn more about Han dynasty here

https://brainly.com/question/11416379

#SPJ5

Answer:

Explain in as much detail as possible.

Explanation:

Usually 10 mark questions want you to make your point and then expand on it, try and get as many facts as you can in without making it sound overly complicated. Then expand on your points and analyse the impacts and significance of the event you're talking about and how it can be linked to the main idea. Good luck!

Answer:

it was compromise

Explanation:

i know cause im smart

hes a hero obviously

Answer:

he is a villian

Explanation:

Answer:

1.) a soldier holding a gun (sorry i cant help much with this question the picture isn't clear)

2.) people the military arr trying g to recruit to participate in the war

3.) It could possibly make people join in and help in the war

4.) 4

Answer:

true po

Explanation:

pa votes po ako thanks

The comparison of the aggressive actions taken by Hitler's Germany to control Europe with the aggressive actions taken by Japan to control Pacific Asia is as follows.

A. Nazi Germany rebuilt the German military following World War I defeat and the Great Depression, followed by aggressively expanding its influence across Europe. It also intensified its Nazi hostility against the European Jews, leading to the Holocaust. Hitler's Nazis took these actions because they intended to internalize Nazism across Europe.

B. In like manner, Japan expanded its territorial aggression across Asia and strengthened its military. The Japanese were in search of natural resources and territorial imperialism.

C. The international responses to Germany's expansionist aggression and Japan's territorial expansion were very much alike because the Democratic West applied a policy of appeasement.

Thus, this appeasement policy of non-interference and war fatigue encouraged the two aggressors to continue their unabated territorial and military aggression until World War II broke and the world was no better for it.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/25880265

The economic system which governed the colonisation of the Americas was mercantilism or merchant capitalism. To be effective, mercantilism had to operate in tandem with colonialism to ensure that the wealth of the subordinated country belonged to the dominant one. It was believed that if the mother country could control all goods in and out of the colony, ensuring that no other country could trade with it, then she would have total control of the wealth that derived from the settlement. Thus, all goods produced in the Spanish colonies had to be exported to Spain and settlers could only officially purchase goods from Spain. Bullion and agricultural products would profit Spanish citizens and expand her treasury as well as increase employment and industries such as shipbuilding.

Spain took several steps to effect her monopolisation of the Americas. In the first place, to solidify her ‘discovery’ and ensure that her claim was recognised, effectively monopolising the Americas in accordance with her mercantilist aspirations, Isabella and Ferdinand sought the ratification of Pope Alexander VI. The Pope divided the world outside of Europe in half. Lands to the west of the Azores belonged to Spain and those to the east belonged to Portugal. This was the Treaty of Tordesillas, ratified in 1494 wherein Portugal would receive Brazil and West Africa, while all 'discoveries' in the Americas belonged to Spain. Though Spain and Portugal, Roman Catholic countries, believed that the Pope’s authority would ensure that Christian Europe would recognise their American claims, the Reformation resulted in Protestant countries such as England and Holland to whom his endorsement of the Treaty of Tordesillas meant very little. In fact, they believed that the Pope should not be involved in secular affairs such as this. France was also interested in Spain's overseas colonies and ignored the Pope's endorsement.

Answer:

Despite her attempts, England, Holland and France managed to oppose Spain's monopoly in several ways; through exploration, piracy/privateering/buccaneering, smuggling (trading illegally with Spanish colonists) and settlement

Explanation: Please be more Specific Thanks

Answer & Explanation:

It was policy proposed by the US in 1899. The goal of The Open Door Notes was to secure an international agreement promoting equal opportunity for international trade and commerce in China. Under this policy all nations would have equal opportunities to trade in China.

The tragedy led to fire-prevention legislation, factory inspection laws, and the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union.

Answer:

The United States' main concern during the Cold War was communism.

Answer:

Plato (c. 428–c. 348 BCE) and Aristotle (384–322 BCE) are generally regarded as the two greatest figures of Western philosophy. According to a conventional view, Plato's philosophy is abstract and utopian, whereas Aristotle's is empirical, practical, and commonsensical.

Explanation:

there you go!

Answer:

According to a conventional view, Plato's philosophy is abstract and utopian, whereas Aristotle's is empirical, practical, and commonsensical. Also, for Plato, thought experiments and reasoning would be enough to "prove" a concept or establish the qualities of an object, but Aristotle dismissed this in favor of direct observation and experience.

Answer:

The answer is A - Water, Animals and fertile lands

Explanation:

They need water to drink, animals as a source of food and fertile land to farm.

Answer:

one of the united states framers

Explanation:

Answer:

The upper chamber of the U.S congress.

Explanation:

Answer: Territorial expansion led to many debates over slavery to determine if they will be slaves for free. Because of many debates, they tried popular sovereignty which meant states could choose to be free or slave, but that later proved to be unsuccessful.

Explanation: Give me the brainiest

Answer: She was a skilled interpreter, an army scout, a lecturer, a teacher, and the first Indian woman to publish a book. She became known for fighting for her people's rights. She also struggled to keep peace between her people and the new white people.

Explanation: I looked it up.

Answer:

Germany had no choice but to sign the Treaty of Versailles. This political cartoon appeared in a German magazine in 1919. In what way is the cartoon sympathetic to Germany during the Treaty of Versailles discussions? It shows that Germany was being forced against its will to sign the treaty.

Answer:

desire for commercial opportunities in Asia,

Explanation:

What was the reasons given for keeping the Philippines?

Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.

Hoped that helped:)

Lewis Nikola proposed a type of constitutional monarchy government in which George Washington had to occupy the position of king. However, this type of government probably would not have been as effective as a constitutional state is.

Lewis Nikola (1717-1807) was an Irish military man who stands out for having held various positions in the United States Army and who urged George Washington through the Newburgh letter to assume the title of King of the United States, being a proposal to establish a constitutional monarchy.

This type of government would not have been as effective as the form of government of the United States has been because the monarchy is an outdated type of government that does not correspond to the needs of the current reality of the world.

On the other hand, this would have developed a series of confrontations between the American patriots because George Washington was a leader and could not betray them by seizing power authoritatively.

Learn more about George Washington in: https://brainly.com/question/4953122