I Need help with this part!!
Science work
Earth/environmental review packet

Answer:

entrapment

Explanation:

Answer:

The Court has held that practically all the criminal procedural guarantees of the Bill of Rights—the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments—are fundamental to state criminal justice systems and that the absence of one or the other particular guarantees denies a suspect or a defendant due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.1077 In addition, the Court has held that the Due Process Clause protects against practices and policies that violate precepts of fundamental fairness,1078 even if they do not violate specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights.1079 The standard query in such cases is whether the challenged practice or policy violates “a fundamental principle of liberty and justice which inheres in the very idea of a free government and is the inalienable right of a citizen of such government.”1080

Answer:

....

Explanation:

Answer:

Congress

Explanation:they were given the power by the constitution to do these things

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer:

intrapersonal and short-term goals

Answer:

its the third one

Explanation:

#plato

Answer:

tax fraud

Explanation:

Answer:

are you telling the audience to learn the language or u need help specifically with the language

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Changing or maintaining particular policies is the primary goal of interest groups.

Answer:

operating a successful business in the United states

Explanation:

Answer:

it is operating a successful business in the united states

Explanation:

pls mark as brainliest

Answer:

C. net asset value x number of shares

Explanation:

Got it right edge2020

Net asset value x number of shares is equal to the total investment of a no-load mutual fund. Hence, option C is correct.

The "net asset value," or "NAV," of an investing company is the total of its assets minus the total of its liabilities. For example, if an investment company owns securities and other assets worth $100 million, $10 million in liabilities, and $90 million in total assets, its NAV will be $90 million.

Adding up a fund's assets and subtracting its liabilities yields its NAV. For instance, if a fund's investments are worth $100 million and it has $10 million in liabilities, its NAV will be $90 million. In addition, if the fund has one million outstanding shares, the NAV per share will be $90.

NAV often falls within a certain range or is equivalent to book value. Usually, companies with promising growth prospects are valued higher.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about Net asset value, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23057744

#SPJ5

Answer:

Economic History. Hope this helps.

Answer:

Please mark as Brainliest :)

Explanation:

Answer: To prevent pirates from duplicating digital copyrighted works and selling or freely distributing them.

Answer:

he has never been stopped by the police before

Answer:

1. What are some of the things the team at the Forensic Anthropology Lab is able to determine by studying bones?

Some of the things they are able to determine are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes

2. Based on the individual’s remains discussed in the video, explain how Dr. Ann Ross and her team were able to determine the person died violently?

Due to the damage done to the skull—they found bullet holes. They then passed this information on to the authorities

3. Explain how researchers obtained information about the individual’s race, sex, height and connection with the local area?

They analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, sex, height, and location .

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Some of the things they are able to determine by studying the bones are what kind of prenatal environment they may have had, what kind of childhood they may have had, if it affected their stature, if it affected their dentition, their diet, and even their climate sometimes.

2. Dr. Ann Ross and her team found the three entrance gunshot wounds on the skull.

3. Researchers had analyzed what they found. They measured, and compared the bones to find the individual’s race, gender, height, and location. The pelvic bones indicate the victim was male. The femur indicates that the victim was about five feet five inches tall, correlating to the population of Chile. The victim’s missing teeth indicated poor nutrition. A fusing of the base of the spine indicated he suffered from the early stages of spina bifida, which correlates to poor pre-natal health.

Explanation:

edg

Answer:

Why put this in law

Explanation:

Bye to u too

Answer:

how can this question can be in law ???? but bye to you ok and a free picture for you ok.

Answer:

If a school is implementing a testing strategy, testing should be offered on a voluntary basis. It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

democracy accepts equality of culture

Answer:

45 i think ?

Explanation:

Answer: Cheif Warrant

Answer:

United States Navy Ranks In Order

This table of the United States Navy ranks from lowest to highest shows the Navy's rank structure from lowest to highest including rank insignia, abbreviation, and rank classification.

The United States Navy has twenty six grades of enlisted seamen and officers, with most seamen enlisting at the entry-level rank of Seaman Recruit (SR, paygrade E-1). The highest rank achievable in the Navy is Fleet Admiral.

"So the adults don't give them an awful life or they don't have the money to take care of the child, or they just don't want it" there is a thing called adoption!!!!!! it should be illegal..

Answer:

well in some places abortion is depends on the state

Take Alabama as an example. In May, Alabama’s governor signed into law a draconian bill that could punish doctors who perform abortions with life in prison. But in practice abortion is already inaccessible for many people in Alabama Arizona California and many more states so it really depends where you live but i want abortion to be illegal because they made the choice to have the baby so yeh

At least 3 for starters.

Answer:

heavy

Explanation:

Answer: A. The heavy one.

Explanation: They both will be exerting force but the heavy football player will exert more force.

Answer:

The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution. It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.

Explanation:

Hope this helped, Have a Wonderful Day!!

Answer:

There were a variety of reasons for this failure, many connected to general weaknesses within the organization, such as voting structure that made ratifying resolutions difficult and incomplete representation among world nations. Additionally, the power of the League was limited by the United States' refusal to join.Finally, the League's greatest weakness came from the fact that it was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. The Treaty had many flaws (for example, reparations) – but the League was supposed to enforce it. Also, the Treaty was hated, especially by the Germans and the Americans, so the League was hated too.The League of Nations came into being after the end of World War One. The League of Nation's task was simple – to ensure that war never broke out again. After the turmoil caused by the Versailles Treaty, many looked to the League to bring stability to the world. America entered World War One in 1917.The Fourteen Points were a proposal made by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in a speech before Congress on January 8, 1918, outlining his vision for ending World War I in a way that would prevent such a conflagration from occurring again.Without its own military force and a guarantee that member states would offer support, it lacked any power to prevent aggression. This would soon be exploited by nations such as Japan and Italy.If this incident happened in your neighborhood, do you think the officer would give you a citation? Explain

Edit: TicketPrivacy is a growing concern in the United States and around the world. The spread of the Internet and the seemingly boundaryless options for collecting, saving, sharing, and comparing information trigger consumer worries. Online practices of business and government agencies may present new ways to compromise privacy, and e-commerce and technologies that make a wide range of personal information available to anyone with a Web browser only begin to hint at the possibilities for inappropriate or unwarranted intrusion into our personal lives. Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age presents a comprehensive and multidisciplinary examination of privacy in the information age. It explores such important concepts as how the threats to privacy evolving, how can privacy be protected and how society can balance the interests of individuals, businesses and government in ways that promote privacy reasonably and effectively? This book seeks to raise awareness of the web of connectedness among the actions one takes and the privacy policies that are enacted, and provides a variety of tools and concepts with which debates over privacy can be more fruitfully engaged. Engaging Privacy and Information Technology in a Digital Age focuses on three major components affecting notions, perceptions, and expectations of privacy: technological change, societal shifts, and circumstantial discontinuities.

All of these gathering and analysis activities have been altered in basic ways by functional advancements in the technologies that have become available for collecting, storing, and manipulating data.

In actual practice, these categories can overlap or the activities in each category can occur in several temporal sequences. When a police officer observes someone breaking a law, the officer is determining that a law has been violated, gathering information about who broke the law (presumably the person he or she is observing), and gaining evidence that may be introduced in court (the testimony of the officer).

The essential difference between these categories is the locus or subject about which the information is gathered. In the first category concerning the breaking of a law, the locus of information is the event or activity. In the second sort of activity, the locus is the determination of an individual or set of individuals involved in the activity. In the third category, information associated with categories one and two are combined in an attempt to link the two in a provable way.

Although activities in the first category usually precede those in the second, this is not always the case. Law enforcement authorities have been known to start with “suspicious people” and then seek to discover what laws they might have broken, might be breaking, or might be planning to break. This is one of the rationales for certain kinds of undercover activity and is frequently regarded as more controversial.

These distinctions are important because they help to differentiate cases that generate concern about invasions of privacy from those that involve less controversial uses of the state’s investigatory power.

Answer: How did Smith know what the suspects look like? Did someone see the two suspects go into the owner's house? If so who seen them? did they report it to the police? If so at what time, and what time is it now? Did the suspects leave any clues? like if it was raining there would be foot prints. Unless if they took off there shoes and had no socks on you can still tell who it is. people's toes have prints on them just like your fingers. If the suspects did not leave evidence Smith should look closely at their clothing to make sure they do not have a weapon on them. Then he should confront them and ask questions. He should tell them "there was a robbery today" then ask them if they know anything about it. If they say no tell them everything that was stolen tell them if they tell you can cross them off of the people who the police suspect. It may be a bluff but they do not know that. When they tell you where they got it wright it down and tell them thank you for your coroporation.Go to the stores they said they got it from. You may need a warrant if their story does not match up go find the suspect confront them and ask why they lied. and so on

Explanation: