False. if an individual attacks a person rather than that person’s ideas, the individual is committing the ad populum fallacy.
The statement is not accurate. The ad populum fallacy, also known as the appeal to popularity, refers to a logical fallacy where someone argues that a claim must be true or valid simply because a large number of people believe it. It does not specifically pertain to attacking a person rather than their ideas.
Attacking a person rather than their ideas falls under the ad hominem fallacy. The ad hominem fallacy occurs when someone attacks the character, traits, or circumstances of an individual making an argument instead of addressing the argument itself. It is a form of logical fallacy because it distracts from the actual merits or flaws of the argument being presented.
Therefore, if an individual attacks a person rather than that person's ideas, they would be committing the ad hominem fallacy, not the ad populum fallacy.
Learn more about committing here
https://brainly.com/question/30501372
#SPJ11
border patrol ten codes
Answer:
10-1. Receiving Poorly
10-2. Receiving Well
10-3. Disregard.
10-4. Acknowledged.
10-5. Be on the Lookout (BOLO)
10-6. Temporarily Busy.
10-7. Out of Service - Unavailable.
10-8. In service - Available.
the anti-federalists won a crucial promise for their passage of the new constitution. this was the addition of a _____ to the constitution.
The anti-federalists won a crucial promise for their passage of the new constitution. This was the addition of a Bill of Rights to the constitution.
The Federalists, who supported the Constitution, were the ones who won the crucial promise for the passage of the new Constitution.
The Federalists believed that a bill of rights was not necessary as they believed that the Constitution itself limited the power of the federal government and protected individual rights.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a bill of rights was essential in order to protect individual rights and liberties from government infringement. As a compromise to assure that the U.S. Constitution would be adopted by the required number of states, the Bill of Rights was inserted as the first 10 amendments in 1791.
To learn more about anti-federalists
https://brainly.com/question/29761963
#SPJ4
What kinds of control are available legislatures? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answer:
1. Financial authority: Legislators have the authority to approve budgets and allocate funding to various programs and initiatives.
2. Legislative authority: Legislators have the authority to create and pass laws that govern numerous parts of society.
3. Oversight control: Legislators can investigate and oversee government agencies to ensure they are operating properly.
4. Appointment control: Legislators have the authority to confirm or reject appointments made by the executive branch.
5. Impeachment control: Through the impeachment process, legislatures can remove public officials from office.
All of these checks and balances are necessary for the legislature to keep the government working properly and citizens' rights safeguarded.
How did the Munich Agreement affect Germany's actions?
The Munich Agreement, signed in 1938, had a significant impact on Germany's actions leading up to and during World War II. The agreement was an agreement between Germany, Britain, France, and Italy, in which they agreed to allow Germany to annex the Sudetenland, a region in Czechoslovakia with a large German-speaking population.
The Munich Agreement effectively gave in to one of Hitler's demands without any real resistance and it was a diplomatic failure as it led to further aggression by the German government. It was seen as a sign of weakness by the Nazis and encouraged them to pursue further territorial expansion. This led to the annexation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, and the invasion of Poland in September 1939, which ultimately led to the outbreak of World War II.
Additionally, the Munich Agreement also had a psychological effect on Hitler and the Nazi leadership. They saw it as a clear demonstration that the other European powers were unwilling to stand up to them and that they could continue to expand their territory without serious repercussions. This emboldened them to continue to pursue aggressive territorial expansion, leading to the outbreak of World War II.
Learn more about Munich Agreement here: https://brainly.com/question/25454285
#SPJ4
Which of the following is true about the Eighth Amendment quizlet?1) a prohibitin against excessive bail 2) excessive fines 3) cruel and unusual punishment
Answer:
1) a prohibition against excessive bail
Explanation:
The 8th amendment stopped excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.
Explain the origins of victim impact statements and identify at least four of the core rights of victims
The first such statement in the United States was made in 1976 in Fresno, California, and became law in California in 1982 as a result of Doris Tate's concern that any members of the Manson family cult who murdered her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may be granted parole.
What are the origins of victim impact statements?Due to Doris Tate's worry that any members of the Manson family cult who killed her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may receive parole, the first such declaration in the United States was delivered in 1976 in Fresno, California, and was established as legislation in California in 1982.
The Victim Impact Statement is crucial because of this. It gives the Court a chance to hear directly from victims of violent crimes about how the defendant's acts have affected them and have continued to harm them.
The Victim Impact Statement has the potential to be a strong and useful tool, depending on its content.
Therefore, the first such statement in the United States was made in 1976 in Fresno, California, and became law in California in 1982 as a result of Doris Tate's concern that any members of the Manson family cult who murdered her daughter Sharon Tate in 1969 may be granted parole.
Know more about the impact statements here:
https://brainly.com/question/28321780
#SPJ1
should the us army donate money to Ukraine while the american people are struggling with poverty blackouts and the overall economy i am doing a s.a. about ukraine vs Russia i need help because i am for the american people but my teacher is not i a afraid he will be byias so i need a neutral paragraph
Answer:
The US Army should not donate money to Ukraine while the American people are struggling with poverty, blackouts, and the overall economy. Although it may be beneficial to support Ukraine as it attempts to secure its borders against Russian encroachment, the reality is that it is ultimately the responsibility of the US government, not the army, to financially aid countries in need. As such, it is important that any foreign aid is allocated where it can have the most impact while still allowing the US people the resources they need to maintain their own basic rights. This requires a careful balancing of competing interests. In the current economic climate, it is essential that American citizens are not deprived of essential needs in order to provide aid to a foreign nation.
While Americans struggle with poverty, outages, and the general economy, the US Army shouldn't give money to Ukraine.
What is Poverety ?Although aiding Ukraine in its efforts to defend its borders against Russian incursion may be advantageous, the US government, not the army, is ultimately responsible for providing financial assistance to underdeveloped nations.
As a result, it's critical that any foreign help be sent where it may have the biggest impact while also giving the US population the funding they require to uphold their own fundamental rights. A careful balancing of conflicting interests is necessary for this. In the present economic environment.
Learn more about Ukraine here
https://brainly.com/question/8695284
#SPJ1
How many kinds of jurisdiction are there in the Supreme Court?
The ability of the High Courts of India to challenge the Supreme Court of India is known as judicial review.
What does it mean to have judicial review?A court proceeding known as judicial review involves a judge evaluating the legality of a public body's decision or action. To put it another way, judicial reviews do not address the benefits and drawbacks of a decision but rather the process by which it was reached.
In India, what does the term "judicial review" mean?The term "judicial review" refers to the authority of the Supreme Court or other High Courts to examine a law's constitutionality. If the Court determines that the law violates the Constitution, it is declared unconstitutional and unenforceable.
To learn more about judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
Courts generally assume the existence of contractual capacity. T or F
Answer:Factors that may affect the capacity to form an enforceable contract include intoxication. If a person was sufficiently intoxicated to lack mental capacity, a contract entered into by the intoxicated person is voidable at the person's option.
Explanation:
What are the arguments for lifetime judicial appointments Federalist 78?
The arguments for lifetime judicial appointments Federalist 78 are that, a lifetime appointment will tend to give the Federal Justices the ability in order to work objectively on behalf of the people.
In the Federalist No. 78, the Hamilton tend to authored that the permanency of the judicial tenure would thus provide the judiciary with the firmness and the independence. Thus, the Federalist 78 tends to discuss the power of the judicial review.
However, the Hamilton tend to believe that the inherent effect of life tenure on the workings of the judiciary was considered to be the citadel of the public justice and also the public security.
To learn more about the Federalist 78 here:
https://brainly.com/question/30095651
#SPJ4
which of the following was a factor that contributed to the growth of nationalism in europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century?
Older identities being undermined as a result of Europe's modernization is one of the factors that contributed to the growth of nationalism in Europe as a powerful political and personal identity in the nineteenth century.
The transition to modernity began in the nations of northwest Europe, particularly in England, the Netherlands, northern France, and northern Germany, between the 16th and 18th centuries.
The 16th century had a significant period of economic growth. The numerous other changes—social, political, and cultural—of the early modern era were greatly influenced by this expansion.
According to Western European histories, the modern era began at the close of colonial invasion and early 19th-century worldwide expansion. In general, the time after the invention of modern warfare, which was characterized by two world wars and was followed by postmodernism, served as an example of modernity.
To learn more about Modernization in Europe, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15212797
#SPJ4
Who are some divorce lawyers in Dubai?
Answer: Typical legal fees for an amicable, uncontested divorce range from approximately Dh20,000 to Dh40,000. The costs of a divorce in the UAE are separate to negotiations in respect of reaching a financial settlement and any disputes relating to children.
Explanation:
All criminal convictions in the USA must be:
a. brought to an appeals court to approve
b. are reviewed by the Governor for appropriateness
c. including a prison sentence
d. made by unanimous jury verdict
All criminal convictions in the USA must be made by unanimous jury verdict.
The correct answer to this is option D.
All criminal defendants in the US are entitled to a jury trial.
According to Recommendation 78, a jury's decision in criminal proceedings must continue to be made unanimously by the other jury members.
The right will be protected under the 6th Amendment. In both instances, judges rather than juries decide the outcome of a criminal case after a trial.
In criminal cases heard in federal courts, a jury must agree unanimously to find the defendant guilty. The judge, attorneys, and defendant are informed after a verdict has been reached.
The jury deliberates in a private chamber with the evidence after both sides in a trial have presented all of their evidence. The jury then decides on a decision and delivers it to the judge.
To know more about, jury verdict click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30087241
#SPJ4
Why is an understanding of the Fourth Amendment important for a police officer?
Answer:
The understanding of the Fourth Amendment is important for police officers so that they do not possibly violate the rights of anyone.
The Fourth Amendment states that people have the right to be protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, and that law enforcement can only conduct a search with probable cause.
If police officers did not fully understand the Fourth Amendment, they may search someone without probable cause, and violate their rights. This could have several consequences, such as something private being found, or someone being wrongly imprisoned due to a personal and legal item in their possession that was seen as evidence.
Therefore, it is important for police officers to understand the Fourth Amendment.
Answer:
It protects American citizens from unreasonable search and seizure by the government,which includes police officers!
Explanation:
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. What should the server do?
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. The server should reject the order of alcohol.
What is moral responsibility?The position of morally deserved praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission in conformity with one's moral responsibilities is known as moral responsibility in philosophy. An important question in ethics is what, if anything, constitutes a "morally obligatory" action. Moral agents are those who are held morally accountable for their actions.
Agents have the capacity to consider their circumstances, make plans for their actions, and then carry those plans out. In the discussion of whether or not people are ever ethically accountable for their acts and, if so, in what capacity, the concept of free will has emerged as a crucial topic. While compatibilists believe the two may coexist, incompatibilists believe that determinism and free will are incompatible.
Learn more about moral responsibility, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13792888
#SPJ2
What types of information are part of the electronic discovery process? (Select all that apply.)
metadata
voicemail messages
network system information
computer files
___The government is strong and uses its power to promote equality of opportunity and protect fundamental liberties, including personal privacy.
A Democratic government is strong and uses its power to promote equality of opportunity and protect fundamental liberties, including personal privacy.
Democracy is a type of governance in which the people have the power to review and decide laws, or elect governing bodies to do so. Who is considered a member of the 'people', and how powers are shared or transferred by the people, have changed over time and at different rates in different countries.
The concept of democracy has evolved considerably over time. Direct democracy, in which communities make choices through public assembly, is found throughout history. Today, representative democracy is the main type of democracy in which voters elect government officials to run on their behalf, similar to parliamentary or presidential democracy.
To know more about Democratic government here-
https://brainly.com/question/2849514
#SPJ4
Does law of segregation occur in meiosis 1 or 2?
Where in meiosis does the law of segregation take place? Meiosis's anaphases I and II are the locations of Mendel's Segregation Law.
During this phase of the first meiotic division, the homologous chromosomes are divided into two daughter nuclei, each with a different gene version.
Does meiosis 1 or 2 experience segregation?Homologous chromosomes form during meiosis I, and sister chromatids separate into daughter cells during meiosis II. Sister chromatids are segregated to the same pole of the bipolar spindle in meiosis I, which is fundamentally different from meiosis II, which can be compared to a mitotic division.
Does meiosis 1 see allele segregation?Now we know that these "laws" are caused by important things that happen during meiotic division: Homologous chromosomes, and as a result, allele pairs, are separated during meiosis I according to the law of segregation.
To learn more about Segregation Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/13434823
#SPJ4
Is Ron DeSantis law helping they students or hurting the students
It is considered acceptable to make a U-Turn by crossing
Answer: a double yellow line under some circumstances, but it is ultimately up to the discretion of the individual driver and the specific circumstances of the situation. Some states or municipalities may have laws or regulations that prohibit making U-Turns under certain conditions, such as heavy traffic or poor visibility. It is important to always check local laws and regulations and to use caution when making a U-Turn, as it can be a dangerous maneuver if not done properly. It is always best to check for oncoming traffic, obey traffic signals and signs, and to use appropriate hand signals when making a U-turn.
Explanation:
A defendant was charged with conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. While on bail with travel restricted to his home state, he purchased an airplane ticket to another country by using an alias. At trial, the prosecution seeks to introduce evidence of the defendant’s ticket purchase. Should the court admit this evidence? A: No, because the evidence does not make any fact of consequence to the trial more or less probable than it would have been without the evidence. B: Yes, because the evidence is relevant both to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt and to show his motive to commit the crime. C: Yes, because the evidence is relevant to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt. D: Yes, because the evidence is relevant to show the defendant’s motive to commit the crime.
B: Yes, because the evidence is relevant both to show the defendant’s consciousness of guilt and to show his motive to commit the crime.
The evidence of the defendant's ticket purchase is relevant because it suggests that the defendant was aware that he was under investigation and was trying to flee the country to avoid prosecution. This is known as "consciousness of guilt" and is admissible in court because it can be used to infer that the defendant knew they were committing a crime.
Additionally, the evidence of the defendant's ticket purchase is also relevant to show his motive to commit the crime, as it could suggest that the defendant was planning to flee in order to continue his illegal activities in another country.
Therefore, the court should admit this evidence as it is relevant to the case, and it makes the fact of the consequence of the trial more or less probable than it would have been without the evidence.
To learn more about prosecution Click
https://brainly.com/question/29970118
#SPJ4
How did the Anti-Federalists feel about presidential power?
The Anti-Federalists about presidential power tend to oppose the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution which is mainly because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and would threaten individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification while believing that the power should thus be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government. Thus, they tend to worry that a stronger federal government would be prone to tyranny.
However, this happened because these Anti-Federalists believed that this new Constitution did not include adequate protections which would be for the rights of the individuals and the states.
To learn more about the Anti-Federalists here:
https://brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ4
Beginning Of American Government
1. Identify ways the American government and European political thinkers influenced the American government
2. Describe the political ideas from the 13 colonies that became part of the American government
3. Describe the events that led to the American colonies decision to fight for independence
4.
Note that with respect to the beginning of the American Government:
Euro thinkers like John Locke gave ideas on freedom and government power.Some of the ideas from the 13 colonies are self-government, representation, and limited power of government.Note that the Britains raising taxes and not letting colonists self-govern themselves led to Revolution, the War, and then independence.Who was John Locke?John Locke FRS was an English philosopher and physician, widely recognized as one of the most prominent of Enlightenment intellectuals and popularly described as the "founder of liberalism.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), in which he developed his theory of ideas and account of the origins of human knowledge in experience, and Two Treatises of Government - 1690, but substantially composed before 1683), in which he tried to defend a theory of political authority based on natural individual rights and liberties and the consent of the subjects is considered to be his best works.
Learn mroe about the American Government:
https://brainly.com/question/10890181
#SPJ1
which of the following applies to pernicious polarization? (select all answer options that apply)
Pernicious polarization is the divide between ideologically different political camps and is harmful to society as a whole. Hence, options A, B, D, and E are the correct options.
Pernicious literally translates to causing harm to something or having a harmful effect as a whole. Polarization refers to segregation within a community that can take place on grounds of differences. So, we can easily understand that pernicious polarization refers to the division of society into two mutually antagonistic political camps that view each other as enemies that pose a threat to the country. This happens because of increasing differences between the two major political parties based mostly on ideology.
It is harmful in nature since It can increase the risk of politically motivated violence and It can make it harder for the political parties to work together to enact policies in the public interest. So, options A, B, D, and E are the correct answers.
The complete question that you might be looking for is given below-
Which of the following applies to pernicious polarization? (select all answer options that apply)
a. It is defined as increasing differences between the two major political parties based mostly on ideology
b. It is defined as the division of society into two mutually antagonistic political camps that view each other as enemies that pose a threat to the country
c. It is thought to be mostly harmless and even beneficial for democracy
d. It can increase the risk of politically motivated violence
e. It can make it harder for the political parties to work together to enact policies in the public interest.
Learn more about polarization on
https://brainly.com/question/29350133?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
What is the law of segregation in meiosis?
Rights that are specifically mentioned are referred to as enumerated rights; however, rights that are not specifically mentioned but that are regarded as essential to the functioning of the nation and the freedoms enjoyed by its citizens are also protected.
These are referred to as unenumerated or implied rights. Our Constitution, by Donald Ritchie.
What are some examples of enumerated powers?Some of these were: to lay out and get taxes; borrow money and pay off debts; regulate trade; the coin; erect postal facilities; safeguard copyrights and patents; reorganize the lower courts; wag a war; and support and raise an Army and Navy.
What are some examples of these rights that are not listed?Some of them were established by 100-year-old Supreme Court decisions. These include the right to travel within the country, the right to privacy, particularly in marriage, and the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
To learn more about enumerated rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/1719867
#SPJ4
What are two details regarding a certificate of deposit CD )?
Fixed Term Length. This is the first detail. This is the period when you accept leaving a certain amount of money deposited in order to avoid receiving a penalty. The period will end on the agreed date of maturity. This is when the certificate of deposit has matured and is ready to be withdrawn penalty free.
Fixed Date Of Withdrawal. This is the second detail, also known as the maturity date. After the period agreed upon ends, the account matures and the money is legible to be withdrawn now. One could choose to withdraw the whole amount or leave a little in the CD for another period of investment.
Consider reading more about certificate of deposit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29789676
#SPJ4
Why did the framers choose to make federal judges lifetime appointments rather than elected officials?
The framers choose to make the federal judges the lifetime appointments rather than the elected officials as, the lifetime term tends to provide the job security, and also allows appointed judges to do what is right under the law.
It is quite important that the federal judges are seen to be appointed to the lifetime appointments as this is intended to order to help ensure that the decisions they make are thus guided by law and judgment and rather than trying in order to placate political interests to save jobs.
However, a judge or justice must be always fair and independent. Thus, a lifetime appointment was not considered as a significant commitment at the founding of the nation. Thus, here the lifetime term tends to provide the job security.
To learn more about the federal judges here:
https://brainly.com/question/2824627
#SPJ4
which of these is an exception to texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer?
Texas law prohibits practically all situations in which a vehicle is operated with a minor under the age of 18 in the truck bed or on a trailer.
Texas law prohibits practically all situations in which a vehicle is operated with a minor under the age of 18 in the truck bed or on a trailer. The following situations are exempt from this rule: driving or towing the vehicle during a procession, When a situation necessitates driving or towing the vehicle, Transporting agricultural workers from one field to another on a county road outside of a municipality, a farm-to-market road, or another route, driving the car on the beach, operating a car that is the only vehicle that the household's members own or run, etc.
To know more about Texas law :
https://brainly.com/question/22001095
#SPJ4
How does a bill become a law in Texas?
Answer:
In Texas, a bill must pass through both chambers of the Legislature and be approved by the Governor before it can become a law. The bill must first pass through the House of Representatives and then the Senate. Once it has been approved by both chambers, it is sent to the Governor for approval. If the Governor signs the bill, it becomes a law. If the Governor vetoes the bill, it is sent back to the Legislature for reconsideration.
Explanation:
How old do you have to be to buy a handgun in texas?
Answer:
18 for private sell / 21 for a federally licensed dealer
Explanation: