If, as the world has long agreed, a very great amount of instruction will not make a wise man, still less will a very mediocre amount of instruction make a wise woman. And the most mischievous form of feminine silliness is the literary form, because it tends to confirm the popular prejudice against the more solid education of women.

When men see girls wasting their time in consultations about bonnets and ball dresses, and in giggling or sentimental love-confidences, or middle-aged women mismanaging their children, and solacing themselves with acrid gossip, they can hardly help saying, “For Heaven’s sake, let girls be better educated; let them have some better objects of thought—some more solid occupations.” But after a few hours’ conversation with an oracular1 literary woman, or a few hours’ reading of her books, they are likely enough to say, “After all, when a woman gets some knowledge, see what use she makes of it! Her knowledge remains acquisition instead of passing into culture; instead of being subdued into modesty and simplicity by a larger acquaintance with thought and fact, she has a feverish consciousness of her attainments; she keeps a sort of mental pocket-mirror, and is continually looking in it at her own ‘intellectuality;’ she spoils the taste of one’s muffin by questions of metaphysics; ‘puts down’ men at a dinner-table with her superior information; and seizes the opportunity of a soirée2 to catechise3 us on the vital question of the relation between mind and matter. And then, look at her writings! She mistakes vagueness for depth, bombast for eloquence, and affectation for originality; she struts on one page, rolls her eyes on another, grimaces in a third, and is hysterical in a fourth. She may have read many writings of great men, and a few writings of great women; but she is as unable to discern the difference between her own style and theirs as a Yorkshireman is to discern the difference between his own English and a Londoner’s: rhodomontade4 is the native accent of her intellect. No—the average nature of women is too shallow and feeble a soil to bear much tillage;5 it is only fit for the very lightest crops.”

It is true that the men who come to such a decision on such very superficial and imperfect observation may not be among the wisest in the world; but we have not now to contest their opinion—we are only pointing out how it is unconsciously encouraged by many women who have volunteered themselves as representatives of the feminine intellect. We do not believe that a man was ever strengthened in such an opinion by associating with a woman of true culture, whose mind had absorbed her knowledge instead of being absorbed by it. A really cultured woman, like a really cultured man, is all the simpler and the less obtrusive for her knowledge; it has made her see herself and her opinions in something like just proportions; she does not make it a pedestal from which she flatters herself that she commands a complete view of men and things, but makes it a point of observation from which to form a right estimate of herself. She neither spouts poetry nor quotes Cicero6 on slight provocation; not because she thinks that a sacrifice must be made to the prejudices of men, but because that mode of exhibiting her memory and Latinity7 does not present itself to her as edifying or graceful. She does not write books to confound philosophers, perhaps because she is able to write books that delight them. In conversation she is the least formidable of women, because she understands you, without wanting to make you aware that you can’t understand her. She does not give you information, which is the raw material of culture—she gives you sympathy, which is its subtlest essence.

The author writes approvingly of the cultured woman’s restraint in quoting poetry and Latin authors (paragraph 3, sentence 4) because

the author respects the woman’s desire to conform to received notions of feminine modesty
A

the author endorses the woman’s decision to tolerate male prejudices against educated women
B

it shows the woman’s ambition to produce original work instead of parroting the works of canonical authors
C

it reveals the woman’s thoughtful consideration of the effects of her own behavior on others
D

it suggests that the woman has wisely devoted more time to studying modern languages than to studying classical literature
E

Answer: construct validity

Explanation:

Construct validity simply explains whether a particular test measures what is being claimed by the test.

Since Chris creates a test that yields the same results as the Wechsler Intelligence test, this shows that his test is high in construct validity. It is said to be high because the test conforms with what is being claimed.

Answer:

2. The domain of the graph is all real numbers less than or equal to 0

Explanation:

Range values are plotted on the y-axis, while domain values are plotted on the x-axis

Looking at the graph, the line starts from the point of origin, (0, 0), and slants upwards towards the left.

This means that, all domain values are less than or equal to 0. While the corresponding range values are equal to or greater than 2. The values are all real numbers.

Therefore, the statement that is true is:

"The domain of the graph is all real numbers less than or equal to 0"

Answer:

ur right

Explanation:

Answer:

2/ and 4/8 are equivalent to 1/2

4/6 is not equivalent to 1/2

Answer:

2/4

Explanation:

Answer:

Divisive forces threaten a country's sovereignty by dividing the country and breaking down the central government. They are called centrifugal forces, and some examples of these forces are religious, ethno-cultural, economic, and spatial differences and can lead to devolution.

A factor which is not considered to be a devolutionary force is a federal system of government.

A devolutionary force can be defined as the tendency for an ethnic group in a particular country to consider itself as a distinct nation with a constitutional or unconstitutional right to independence or autonomy.

This ultimately implies that, a federal system of government which is not considered to be a devolutionary force because it is a central government.

Read more on devolutionary force here: https://brainly.com/question/25768895

#SPJ2

Answer:

free association

Explanation:

Answer:

The Correct answer for this question is False if you find this helpful please mark as brainliest and rate 5 stars and leave a thanks also if its not I'm sorry and I will change my Answer.

Explanation:

The studies on the effects of the big five state that there is no correlation between one personality trait and other attributes that are False.

The big five is a personality trait that was developed in the 1980s in the trait theory and when the factor analysis is applied to it tells us the systematic associations that describe the aspects of personality.

The big five factors are

Find out more information about the personality.

brainly.com/question/17636115

Panimula

Ayon sa Artikulo VIII, Seksyon 1 ng 1987 Konstitusyon, ang kapangyarihan ng Hudikatura ay nakasalalay sa Korte Suprema (Supreme Court) at mga mababang korte (lower courts). Katungkulan nitong desisyunan ang mga pagtatalo hinggil sa mga karapatang ipinagkaloob ng batas sa bawat mamamayan. Pagpapasyahan ng mga korte ng Hudikatura kung napagkait o nalabag ang legal na karapatan ng isang partido, at maaari itong gumawa ng mga hakbang upang maibalik ang karapatang ito sa mananalo sa kaso.

May tinatamasang pagsasarili ang Hudikatura sa aspekto ng pananalapi. Hindi maaaring bawasan ng Lehislatura ang pondo nito nang mas mababa sa pondo nito noong nakaraang taon (Artikulo VIII, Seksyon 3).

Answer:

because he'd seen a tv show about the troubled in schools and lack of qualified teachers. He also wanted to challenge himself.

Answer:

False.

Explanation:

There is no statute that prohibits the employer from asking this question on a potential candidate while interviewing him/her. Some states have made it illegal to ask this question.

Answer:

May 2, 2019 — Identifying the overall constitutional principle ... In League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the ... v. Perry, the Court ruled that the map in Texas was not unconstitutional on ... A. One difference between Shaw v Reno and the mentioned court case is that in Shaw v Reno, the court decided that the.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. A difference between League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry and Shaw v. Reno is that Shaw v. Reno was a dispute over an irregularly shaped district that suppressed minority, specifically Black, voters. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry was also a dispute over legislative districts, but it was between the Plaintiffs and Republicans. In Shaw v. Reno, the district in question was declared unconstitutional, whereas the districts discussed in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry were not declared unconstitutional. Another difference is that the argument in Shaw v. Reno was that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause was violated, but in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the argument was that the Voting Rights Act was violated.

2. The ruling on District 23 in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry was different from the ruling on I-85 in Shaw v. Reno because it was not ruled unconstitutional, whereas, in Shaw v. Reno, I-85 was ruled unconstitutional because it disproportionately affected Black voters. In League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the Supreme Court also ruled that district maps could be redrawn at any time as long as it was redrawn every 10 years. Even though Latino voters became a minority of voting citizens in District 23, it was still declared constitutional.

3. The Supreme Court was concerned about getting into the “political thicket” in relation to the separation of powers because the Supreme court is supposed to be free from political influences, so the Supreme Court had to make a decision that did not favor one party over another. The Supreme Court has the authority to declare things constitutional or unconstitutional, only the judicial branch can do this, enforcing the principle of separation of powers.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

The Immigration Reform and Control Act altered US immigration law by making it illegal to hire illegal immigrants knowingly 

On May 14, 2002 the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (Border Security Act) was signed into law. [Pub.L. 107-173, 116 STAT. 543 (May 14, 2002)].

The table of contents for this Act:

Sec. 1. Short title.

Sec. 2. Definitions.

TITLE I--FUNDING

Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations for hiring and training Government personnel.

Sec. 102. Authorization of appropriations for improvements in technology and infrastructure.

Sec. 103. Machine-readable visa fees.

TITLE II--INTERAGENCY INFORMATION SHARING

Sec. 201. Interim measures for access to and coordination of law enforcement and other information.

Sec. 202. Interoperable law enforcement and intelligence data system with name-matching capacity and training.

Sec. 203. Commission on interoperable data sharing.

Sec. 204. Personnel management authorities for positions involved in the development and implementation of the interoperable electronic data system ("Chimera system").

TITLE III--VISA ISSUANCE

Sec. 301. Electronic provision of visa files.

Sec. 302. Implementation of an integrated entry and exit data system.

Sec. 303. Machine-readable, tamper-resistant entry and exit documents.

Sec. 304. Terrorist lookout committees.

Sec. 305. Improved training for consular officers.

Sec. 306. Restriction on issuance of visas to nonimmigrants who are from countries that are state sponsors of international terrorism.

Sec. 307. Designation of program countries under the Visa Waiver Program.

Sec. 308. Tracking system for stolen passports.

Sec. 309. Identification documents for certain newly admitted aliens.

TITLE IV--INSPECTION AND ADMISSION OF ALIENS

Sec. 401. Study of the feasibility of a North American National Security Program.

Sec. 402. Passenger manifests.

Sec. 403. Time period for inspections.

Sec. 404. Joint United States-Canada projects for alternative inspections services.

TITLE V--FOREIGN STUDENTS AND EXCHANGE VISITORS

Sec. 501. Foreign student monitoring program.

Sec. 502. Review of institutions and other entities authorized to enroll or sponsor certain nonimmigrants.

TITLE VI--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 601. Extension of deadline for improvement in border crossing identification cards.

Sec. 602. General Accounting Office study.

Sec. 603. International cooperation.

Sec. 604. Statutory construction.

Sec. 605. Report on aliens who fail to appear after release on own recognizance.

Sec. 606. Retention of nonimmigrant visa applications by the Department of State.

Under right-to-work laws, states have the authority to determine whether workers can be required to join a labor union to get or keep a job.

Answer:

x=30 is answer required over here.hope this helps.best of luck.

Answer:

When traveling at 55mph, that's enough time to cover the length of a football field blindfolded” (2009, VTTI). Driving has become an automatic process for most of us who drive therefore many drivers will divide their attention to a few tasks at the same time while driving.

Explanation:

Explanation:

I do not know the rest of the question (answer choices), however, what you want to do with this equation is put it into slope-intercept form to be able to test which points might lie on that line.

3x + 7y = 21

7y= -3x + 21

y= -3/7x + 3

Now, you want to plug in your values to see which set this equation satisfies.

Answer:

I can relate

Explanation:

Answer:

u just got rick rolled

Explanation:

Answer:

7.6997

Explanation:

Given :

X : ____7 ____ 15 ____ 28

P(X) __0.2 ___0.49 ____?

ΣP(x) = 1

0.2 + 0.49 + a = 1

a = 1 - 0.69

a = 0.31

Standard deviation = sqrt(Variance(x))

Variance = Var(X) = Σx²p(x) - E(x)²

E(x) = Σx*p(x) = (7*0.2) + (15*0.49) + (28*0.31) =

E(x) = 17.43

Σx²p(x) = (7^2 * 0.2) + (15^2 * 0.49) + (28^2 * 0.31) = 363.09

Var(X) = Σx²p(x) - E(x)²

Var(X) = 363.09 - 17.43^2

Var(X) = 363.09 - 303.8049

Var(X) = 59.2851

Standard deviation = sqrt(59.2851)

Standard deviation = 7.6996818

= 7.6997

Answer:

c go with out

Explanation:

i got it on my test

Answer:

Im pretty sure it is B i am not sure correct me if im wrong if i am right plz mark bRAINLIEST

Explanation:

Answer:

no I m not

would you be my v girlfrie nd

Answer:

I CANT READ IT

Explanation:

OOF

Answer:

.,. X_X :(

hnbgvdxhbkj

Explanation:

Answer:

The AP analysis essay is scored based on a 9 point system. To begin, the highest score to be received is a 9, in the event the writer uses evidence and explanations correctly and defends their position by applying at least 3 sources to the text. The prose demonstrates a consistent ability to control a wide range of the elements of effective writing and contains a high level of sophistication with an impressive vocabulary. The essay being written must have a clear thesis and explain all areas of the argument correctly. Additionally, the body of the essay should not stray from the thesis. AP scoring individuals are highly trained and will examine these characteristics as well as errors in spelling and grammar.

Explanation:

Edge2021 :)

Answer:  

B?

Explanation:

Under NAFTA, exports from Maquiladoras are not taxed and beginning wages for Mexican workers may be less than a dollar per hour.

Also, Maquiladoras are plants in Mexico, that typically use low-cost labor to assemble imported parts for consumer goods and then export the goods back to the United States or other countries.

Thus, the correct option for this question is C.

Maquiladoras may be defined as a type of low-cost factory that was established in Mexico and was owned by a foreign corporation. The facilities for these factories are typically located near the U.S.-Mexico border.

These plants of Maquiladoras fabricate products and export them back to the United States and other countries in order to generate some revenue. This was one of the sources of revenue generation used by Mexico.

Therefore, the correct option for this question is C.

To learn more about Maquiladoras, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/15991395

#SPJ2

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The relationship between the social history of Texas and the political characteristics of the state’s diverse population. can be traced back to when the territory of Texas belonged to the Mexican government. Then, we can identify the times of Stephen F. Austin trying to colonize the Texas territory, negotiating with the Mexican authorities to grant the authorization to bring Anglo people to Texas. Then, fateful episodes such as the Alamo, and later, the victory of the Texan army in the Battle of San Jacinto, in Galveston. After being a Republic, Texas was annexed to the Union but there has always been a mixture of the Anglo culture with the Mexican culture even today. That intermingling of belief systems, culture, and traditions is one of the notorious things that characterizes Texas, especially cities such as San Antonio, El  Paso, Houston, and Dallas.