In Paragraph 11, what does the narrator suggest is MOST essential to successful farming?
- correct equipment
- dedicated farmers
- six inches of topscil
- the right amount of precipitation

Answer:

Facts indicate that a text is expository

Incomplete question. I provided a brief about information and how it is presented to be easily understood.

Explanation:

Information generally refers to facts that are made available or presented to the desired audience.

Common forms of presenting information in a way that they would easily be understood include:

it is a responsibility though??

The theme illustrated in the story is that when one is confident, the person can find the strength and inner peace to be able to do anything.

A theme simply means the underlying message that's in a story. It's what the author wants the readers to know.

The theme that's illustrated is that if one is confident, the person can find the strength and inner peace to be able to do anything. The comments of the general was important for the plot to move forward.

Learn more about theme on:

https://brainly.com/question/11600913

In April 1963 King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined with Birmingham, Alabama’s existing local movement, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), in a massive direct action campaign to attack the city’s segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the Easter season, the second biggest shopping season of the year. As ACMHR founder Fred Shuttlesworth stated in the group’s “Birmingham Manifesto,” the campaign was “a moral witness to give our community a chance to survive” (ACMHR, 3 April 1963).

The campaign was originally scheduled to begin in early March 1963, but was postponed until 2 April when the relatively moderate Albert Boutwell defeated Birmingham’s segregationist commissioner of public safety, Eugene “Bull” Connor, in a run-off mayoral election. On 3 April the desegregation campaign was launched with a series of mass meetings, direct actions, lunch counter sit-ins, marches on City Hall, and a boycott of downtown merchants. King spoke to black citizens about the philosophy of nonviolence and its methods, and extended appeals for volunteers at the end of the mass meetings. With the number of volunteers increasing daily, actions soon expanded to kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county building to register voters. Hundreds were arrested.

On 10 April the city government obtained a state circuit court injunction against the protests. After heavy debate, campaign leaders decided to disobey the court order. King declared: “We cannot in all good conscience obey such an injunction which is an unjust, undemocratic and unconstitutional misuse of the legal process” (ACMHR, 11 April 1963). Plans to continue to submit to arrest were threatened, however, because the money available for cash bonds was depleted, so leaders could no longer guarantee that arrested protesters would be released. King contemplated whether he and Ralph Abernathy should be arrested. Given the lack of bail funds, King’s services as a fundraiser were desperately needed, but King also worried that his failure to submit to arrests might undermine his credibility. King concluded that he must risk going to jail in Birmingham. He told his colleagues: “I don’t know what will happen; I don’t know where the money will come from. But I have to make a faith act” (King, 73).

On Good Friday, 12 April, King was arrested in Birmingham after violating the anti-protest injunction and was kept in solitary confinement. During this time King penned the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” on the margins of the Birmingham News, in reaction to a statement published in that newspaper by eight Birmingham clergymen condemning the protests. King’s request to call his wife, Coretta Scott King, who was at home in Atlanta recovering from the birth of their fourth child, was denied. After she communicated her concern to the Kennedy administration, Birmingham officials permitted King to call home. Bail money was made available, and he was released on 20 April 1963.

In order to sustain the campaign, SCLC organizer James Bevel proposed using young children in demonstrations. Bevel’s rationale for the Children’s Crusade was that young people represented an untapped source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older activists. On 2 May more than 1,000 African American students attempted to march into downtown Birmingham, and hundreds were arrested. When hundreds more gathered the following day, Commissioner Connor directed local police and fire departments to use force to halt the demonstrations. During the next few days images of children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses, clubbed by police officers, and attacked by police dogs appeared on television and in newspapers, triggering international outrage. While leading a group of child marchers, Shuttlesworth himself was hit with the full force of a fire hose and had to be hospitalized. King offered encouragement to parents of the young protesters: “Don’t worry about your children, they’re going to be alright. Don’t hold them back if they want to go to jail. For they are doing a job for not only themselves, but for all of America and for all mankind” (King, 6 May 1963).

In the meantime, the white business structure was weakening under adverse publicity and the unexpected decline in business due to the boycott, but many business owners and city officials were reluctant to negotiate with the protesters. With national pressure on the White House also mounting, Attorney General Robert Kennedy sent Burke Marshall, his chief civil rights assistant, to facilitate negotiations between prominent black citizens and representatives of Birmingham’s Senior Citizen's Council, the city’s business leadership.

Answer:

verb phrase

Explanation:

The author showed the struggle of the characters in "The Grapes of Wrath" by; advocating social change by indicating the unfair working conditions the migrants face when they reach California.

The Grapes of Wrath can be interpreted as a proletarian novel, advocating social change by showing the unfair working conditions faced by migrants when they reach California. The men who own the land there hold the power, and attempt to control supply and demand so that they can get away with paying poor wages.

Read more on The grapes of Wrath;

https://brainly.com/question/895499

Answer:

mythology and mythical goes to myth. telegraph and television goes to tele and automatic and automobile goes to auto.

Answer:

AUTO:

automatic

automobile

MYTH:

mythology

mythical

TELE:

television

telegraph

Explanation:

There u go don't forget to smile today:)

Answer:

the answer is A

Answer:

Language is most objective when based upon  evidence.

Explanation:

Being objective means sticking to the facts, and not feelings, beliefs, thoughts, or opinions (which were the other three options given). So, that can be applied to a language too. Facts, which are supported by the evidence, are veritable and unfeigned, and not someone`s point of view or something that can be changed under the influence of some factors. In that way, language is objective which makes it fair and correct, and it corresponds with real life.

Answer:

Bullying can happen in many ways....

Explanation:

Answer:

"A similar proverb, believed to be from Persia, says "He who wants a rose must respect the thorn". Here too the idea of imperfection is expressed, teaching that one can only have a loving relationship with another after respecting that individual's differences and flaws"-phrases dot or g

Explanation:

Answer:

you said thanks for an answer and added me i never answered a question lol

Explanation:

Answer:

Then your character walks out the chinese restaurant, and says nothing....

When your character gets in the car they think should they leave the city...then mins later they decide I'll just leave the city to make sure. They drive to there home and grab there stuff quickly....Then hops in the car and leaves the city.......as they left the city they get a mysterious call-...... What happens next? Should they answer?

Explanation:

Hope this helps, I tried my best LOL

Answer:

the answer is understatement

Explanation:

Answer: In the article “Foreign News at a Crisis Point,” Peter S. Goodman eloquently argues the ‘point’ that news organizations should increase the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to people in the United States. Goodman builds his argument by using facts and evidence, addressing the counterarguments, and couching it all in persuasive and compelling language.

Goodman begins the article by bombarding the reader with facts and statistics. He states that, according to a census conducted by the American Journalism Review, the number of full-time foreign news correspondents in the United States dropped from 307 in 2003 to 234 in 2011. In addition, the AJR survey also discovered that “the space devoted to foreign news [in American papers] had shrunk by 53 percent” in the last 25 years.

Beginning the article with all of these facts and figures has a couple of strengthening effects on Goodman’s argument. First, by starting out with hard evidence, Goodman lays the groundwork of his own credibility. He’s not just writing an opinion piece – his opinion is backed by the truth. This will bring the readers onboard and make them more likely to trust everything else he says. Second, because Goodman presents these facts without much explaining/interpreting, the reader is forced to do the math herself. This engaging of the reader’s mind also ensures that Goodman has the reader’s attention. When the reader does the math to find a drop of 73 full-time foreign news correspondents employed by US papers in just 8 short years, she will find herself predisposed to agree with Goodman’s call for more professional foreign news reporting.

In addition to employing facts to his argument’s advantage, Goodman also cunningly discusses the counterargument to his position. By writing about how social media and man-on-the-ground reporting has had some positive impact on the state of foreign news reporting, Goodman heads off naysayers at the pass. It would have been very easy for Goodman to elide over the whole issue of citizen reporting, but the resultant one-sided argument would have been much less convincing. Instead, Goodman acknowledges things like “the force of social media during the Arab Spring, as activists convened and reacted to changing circumstances.” As a result, when he partially refutes this counterargument, stating the “unease” many longtime profession correspondents feel over the trend of ‘citizen journalism’ feel, the reader is much more likely to believe him. After all, Goodman acknowledges that social media does have some power. Knowing that Goodman takes the power of social media seriously will make the reader more inclined, in turn, to take Goodman’s concern about the limits of social media seriously.

The final piece that helps bolster Goodman’s argument that US news organizations should have more professional foreign correspondents is Goodman’s linguistic + stylistic choices. Goodman uses contrasts to draw the reader deeper into his mindset. By setting up the contrast between professional reporters as “informational filters” that discriminate good from bad and amateur, man-on-the-spot reporters as undiscriminating “funnels,” Goodman forces the reader to view the two in opposition and admit that professional filters are to be preferred over funnels that add “speculation, propaganda, and other white noise” to their reporting. In addition, Goodman drives the reader along toward agreeing with his conclusion in the penultimate paragraph of the article with the repetition of the phrase “We need.” With every repetition, Goodman hammers even further home the inescapable rightness of his argument. The use of “We” more generally through the article serves to make the readers feel sympathetic towards Goodman and identify with him.

By employing the rhetorical techniques of presenting facts, acknowledging the other side, and using persuasive language, Goodman convinces the reader of his claim.

Answer:

C) Flat

Explanation:

The metaphor describes a physical quality of the landmass. Just as a mountain is jagged, a plateau is flat (as is shown in the sentence).

Answer:

you can whatever ones you want...

Explanation:

Answer:

third option - the ingenuity of German design was apparent even when quality materials were unavailable.

Explanation:

Cheers!

answer:

what underlined section?

explanation:

i truly want to help you but there's no context to the question.

Answer: Correct as is.

Explanation:

The suggestion that has been given regarding the term “frame” from the statement is: “a structure that supports the whole body.” Hence, Option B is correct.

A structure is the combination and organisation of connected components in a physical thing or system, or the organised object or system.

Both naturally occurring materials like biological beings, minerals, and chemicals, as well as man-made objects like buildings and machines, are examples of material structures.

A structure is a made-up building or a specific grouping of objects or individuals, especially those with several elements. A recently constructed home is an illustration of a structure.

The way DNA components are arranged is an illustration of structure. the organisation or development of an organism's tissues, organs, or other parts.

Therefore, Option B is correct.

Learn more about structure from here:

https://brainly.com/question/4072914

#SPJ2

Answer:

figure

Explanation:

Answer:

At the end of the same scene, Macbeth explains to the murderers that not only must Banquo die, but also his son Fleance "must embrace the fate / Of that dark hour" (3.1. 136-137). Here "fate" means a terrible thing that is going to happen because Macbeth is going to make it happen.

Explanation:

hope this helps!

Answer:

ohhh

ayan

na

pareho

pala

tayong

subject

Answer:

A. such

Explanation:

I’m assuming that you want the word that is incorrect in the sentence which would be ‘such’ as it does not make sense in the sentence. It would be better to write: He was so exhausted that he count even stand on his feet.

Answer:

Inaccessible

Explanation:

The answer would be Inaccessible because in means not and if you combine both accessible and not together it will say not accessible.

Answer:

The purpose of prewriting

Explanation:

The purpose of prewriting is to give the writer some time to come up with what they want to put down, it's kind of like brainstorming everything and jotting down things so that the writer can get more of a sense of what they are writing about.

Answer:The first sentence. If you can't select that then I am unsure

Explanation: