IS THIS CORRECT PLEASE HELP

literal language i just googled it pal

Ans17, Raj Street

Mumbai  65

Dear Friend,

Hope this letter finds you in the best of spirits. Recently I had been a trip to my native village and had some positive and negative experiences. Firstly the village is  a place where complete peace of mind exists available from the hustle and bustle of life.

In village we can inhale the pure air and we feel fresh these are some advantages in villages.

You can enjoy the best of natural resources. Though the only drawback is that  the use of technology is restricted, there is some lack in transportation facilities, lack of medical facilities. This is a real problem as we are used to it at a massive level.

Hope you will understand the advantages and disadvantages about village life.

Yours loving

Rairiwer:

Explanation:

not my answer but hopes this help you !

Bellow, there is an image of how the letter structure should look

To sum up, you should brainstorm and organize your ideas in paragraphs, then write your final version of the letter where you add the address, the greeting, and then goodbye.

You can learn more about letters here:

https://brainly.com/question/20886230?referrer=searchResults

https://brainly.com/question/18709470?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

An erasure poem is like a photo-negative of a blackout poem. The redacted text is not blackened but erased, clipped out, or obscured beneath white-out, pencil, gouache paint, colored marker, sticky notes, or stamps

Explanation:

The first paragraph suggests that both students and teachers prefer the Imperial Book Depot to the bookshop closer to campus. (option C)

The first paragraph belongs to a passage from a novel where two young women visit a bookshop. The narrator explains that the Imperial Book Depot is not as close to the campus of the university. However, students and teachers prefer to purchase from it.

The reason for that is the fact that the owners, Yashwant and Balwant, are good people who try their best to help customers and get them the books they want. Even though they are not fluent in English, they are great businessmen.

With the information above in mind, we can select option C as the correct answer.

The complete passage can be found attached.

Learn more about bookshops here:

https://brainly.com/question/819672

Answer:

second person point of view

Explanation:

he is talking about the situation from ur point of view.

ur welcome :)

Answer:

Mowgli is the character, the boy

Explanation:

Answer:

The reason you should have a front page in front of your rewritten notes is because you should have a glossary. A glossary makes things easier to find, it help to tell you where things are in a book or a notebook.

Explanation:

The reasons that help the case that the investigation of foreign language ought to be expected for secondary school graduation are:

Learning another dialect can expand youngsters' viewpoint in light of upgrading their interactive abilities. At the point when they become familiar with an unknown dialect, they become more keen on that nation and can make an association with all the more without any problem.

Additionally, they can adapt to their future issues connected with their field of concentrate by approaching the assortment of sources introduced in their subsequent language.

The fact of the matter being made in the case is that the investigation of an unknown dialect is fundamental for secondary school graduation. Along these lines, the accentuation is on secondary school graduation.

For more information about language, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/2427003

Answer:

125

Explanation:

Answer:

Many things will happen "in time".

Lives can change "in time".

People must learn to adapt to many things "in time".

Explanation:

There are many different sentences that can be made with this, in time.

XD I like puns :P

I used the same answer in another question the same as this one

Answer:

Explanation:4

I think maybe because young people dont exactly know what there doing. some people say young people are young and dumb but we think we know everything. but truly if we did we would succeed more often. but life is full of mistakes so.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

A secondary source is a source that you don't "need" per say, but it can be helpful to find additional information.

Answer:

Shakespeare's language contributed 1,700 words to the English

Language.

Explanation:

He was the first author to use those words. It is called Early Modern English, aka Elizabethan English.

Shakespeare's language is the only truly "Shakespearean" quality of his play as Shakespeare's language gave the English language 1,700 words.

A play is a piece of drama that is intended to be performed on stage rather than read aloud. It often consists mostly of character conversation. A playwright is the person who writes a play.

The highest levels of commercial theatre inside the English-speaking world, London's West End as well as Broadway in New York City, as well as regional theatre, community theatre, university or school performances, are just a few of the venues where plays are produced. Shakespeare's language is the only truly "Shakespearean" quality of his play as Shakespeare's language gave the English language 1,700 words.

Therefore, Shakespeare's language is the only truly "Shakespearean" quality of his play as Shakespeare's language gave the English language 1,700 words.

To know more about play, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545310

#SPJ2

Answer:

Clause

Explanation:

Is the group of words in bold a phrase or a clause? Humans are classified as omnivores because they generally consume both plants and animals, although some people are vegetarians or vegans.

What's that evidence?  

Answer:

Tasha maybe;)

Explanation

Answer:

Tasha

Explanation:

I know ;)

Answer:

Drew Hayden Taylor's essay, “Pretty Like a White Boy: The Adventures of a Blue Eyed Ojibway”, is about Taylor's experiences as a half-Ojibway and half-Caucasian Canadian, and in that essay, he uses the term “Special Occasion” to describe himself.

Answer:

Drew Hayden Taylor writes, in his 1991 essay, about his life being a First Nations man but looking “Pretty like a white boy.” He writes about how he witnessed and heard so much racism towards First Nations people because people thought he was Caucasian.

Explanation:

HiH

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I would assume so,  since it uses like. I am not 100% sure tho.

Answers are as follow:

Part A

What argument does Kennedy make in his “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech?

ANS: Democracy is morally superior to communism.

Part B

Which answer choice presents the most logical reasoning in support of the argument identified in Part A?

ANS: "... we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in."

In his "Ich bin ein Berliner" lecture, John F. Kennedy argued that democracy is morally better than communism. As a result, in PART A, Option (D) is the appropriate response.

"We have never had to build a wall around our people to keep them inside." this is the line of reasoning that, in light of the argument presented in PART A, makes the greatest sense. As a result, in PART B, Option (D) is the appropriate response.

A democracy is a system of government in which the citizens have the power to make laws and decide who will represent them in office.

Freedom of assembly, association, property rights, freedom of speech, inclusivity and equality, citizenship, and minority rights are among the foundational principles of democracy.

Democracy as a concept has changed significantly over time. Direct democracy was the initial form of government. The most widespread type of democracy today is a representative democracy, in which citizens choose representatives to rule on their behalf, as in a parliamentary or presidential democracy.

Hence, Option (D) is the correct answer in both parts.

Learn more about Democracy, from:

brainly.com/question/13158670

#SPJ5

Context clues are characterized as hints that allow the readers to determine the meaning of words that are unknown or unfamiliar to them.

Learn more about 'figurative language' here:

brainly.com/question/2569664

Answer:

this is the right answer

Explanation:

Based on the context in the excerpt, we know that the narrator is using a “translation app,” which tells us she does not speak the language TingTing is speaking. The phrase “whirs the music of her voice” describes how the translation app interprets TingTing's voice so the narrator can understand what she is saying. The word music makes me think of continuous, repeated sounds that are pleasurable to the listener. The word whirs convey the image of a record player or a CD spinning. So, all these clues put together help us to understand that the translation app is interpreting TingTing’s voice and language into a continuous stream of words (like a song) that the narrator can understand.

Answer:

"Remember that time we took the car to Bear Mountain, and we re-ah-lized that we had forgotten to pack an opener with our pick-a-nick?"

Explanation:

This is the excerpt that reveals Laura's Dominican origin through her unique pronunciation. In this line, we learn that Laura mispronounces the words "realized" and "picnic." She seems to have trouble with vowels, and it appears that she pronounces them in a more "open" way, closer to their Spanish sound. This shows that Laura's Dominican origin has an impact on her pronunciation.

The excerpt that discloses the emergence of Laura's Dominican through unique pronunciation would be:

B). "Remember that time we took the car to Bear Mountain, and we re-ah-lized that we had forgotten to pack an opener with our pick-a-nick?"

Thus, option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Pronunciation" here:

brainly.com/question/3774067

Answer:

I'm not 100% sure, but it was the Jews. Laws against the Jews were then applied to the Roma people.

Answer:

Figuative language uses surprising description to make things seem vivid

Explanation:

Answer:

It's C.

Explanation:

The vivid descriptions make it unrecognizable, but it's familiar to the character.

Answer:

good things happen to good people

Explanation:

the theme of the story is good people are always rewarded. The theme of the bachelor's story is bad things happen to good people

Answer:

C. Goodness is not necessarily rewarded.

It's the correct answer. I hope this helps!

Explanation:

The question makes two significant assumptions. First, it assumes that Indian immigrants are more successful than those who don’t immigrate. And second, relevant to this blog, at least part of the explanation is believed to be psychological (which is why I was invited to participate in the event).

In this post, I want to unpack this question. To make the discussion manageable, I’ll focus only on Indian immigrants to the United States, even though the total Indian diaspora is far greater and widespread, and other US immigrant groups are bigger.

Are Indian immigrants to the US successful?

The answer is clearly “yes” no matter which benchmark we use. More than 75 percent of current first-generation Indian-Americans have immigrated to the United States since the 1990s. They make up only about 1 percent of the US population (3.9 million as of 2017) but have disproportionate numbers of professionals such as physicians, corporate executives, and successful entrepreneurs. Their median annual household income is $100,000, which is significantly higher than other immigrant groups or the US population as a whole.  

If we compare these numbers to Indian non-immigrants, the income differences are even larger. As an example, college-educated Indians in India have a household income that is a small fraction of $100,000. Based on these statistics, it seems fair to say that as a group, Indian immigrants to the US are financially successful.

(Note that financial success does not mean success in other life domains. Do Indian immigrants have more fulfilling social lives? Are they more content? Or to drop the H-word, are they happier? These questions are equally important. I’ll address them in future blog posts).

Why are they successful?

They came to America’s shores with only the clothes on their backs and hope welling in their hearts. They slogged away for decades in obscurity and misery, grasping every sliver of opportunity. They lifted themselves up by their bootstraps out of American gutters. Time passed, watered by the sweat streaming off their backs. They scrimped, they saved, penny after penny. After decades of blinding toil, they were earning six-figure incomes. America transformed the huddled unwashed masses of Indians who reached its shores into prosperous business leaders and yuppies who shone as “model immigrants.”

Alas, riveting and uplifting as such a narrative sounds, it is false.

The fact is the success of Indian immigrants can be attributed to a three-level selection process. The first level is education. According to the Immigration Policy Institute, 77 percent of Indian American adults have a college degree. In comparison, only 29 percent of all immigrants and 31 percent of native-born Americans are college graduates. Very few uneducated Indians make it to the US. Organizational psychologists even have a name for this type of immigrants; they are called “qualified immigrants.”The second level of selection is the arduous and lengthy immigration process. Most first-generation Indian-Americans come to the US as students, go on to get a job with an H1-B visa (which involves a lottery), and eventually, after many years, become permanent residents and then US citizens. The entire process is fraught with uncertainty. It vets aspiring immigrants. The people who hang in there from beginning to end are optimistic and gritty. What’s more, because they come as students, they have more opportunities to interact with native-born Americans and consume American culture from their very first day on American soil than other immigrants. This helps them to assimilate and build social capital along the way (if they want to).

The third and perhaps the most significant selection is in who the immigrants are. As authors Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld point out, “the great majority of Indian immigrants in America come from the upper echelons of India’s social hierarchy.” Most of them are from higher castes, which means they have access to influential social networks both in India and in the US. These are the people likely to succeed financially no matter whether they stay in India or immigrate. Because of these three selection processes, the typical Indian-American is starkly different from the typical Indian or native-born American.

What should we conclude?

Only that we shouldn’t read too much into the financial success of Indian-Americans. Nor should we belittle the Indians who couldn’t or chose not to immigrate to the United States, or elsewhere, or the other immigrant and native-born US groups who have lower incomes. As psychologists have found, a significant chunk of a person’s success in any domain, including financial success, is dictated by their luck. This includes the fortune of their birth.

the meaning of litter in this context is trash