Language is most objective when based upon

opinion.
beliefs.
thoughts.
evidenc

Answer:

you can whatever ones you want...

Explanation:

Answer:

third option - the ingenuity of German design was apparent even when quality materials were unavailable.

Explanation:

Cheers!

Answer:

wheres the following bro

Explanation:

Answer:

figure

Explanation:

Answer:

Bullying can happen in many ways....

Explanation:

Answer:

mythology and mythical goes to myth. telegraph and television goes to tele and automatic and automobile goes to auto.

Answer:

AUTO:

automatic

automobile

MYTH:

mythology

mythical

TELE:

television

telegraph

Explanation:

There u go don't forget to smile today:)

Answer:The pitcher thinks that the batter is much better than he is.

Explanation:hope this helps brainliest

Answer:

A

Explanation:

They want to give the reader excitment. They also want the reader to read further! Hope this helps!

Answer: In the article “Foreign News at a Crisis Point,” Peter S. Goodman eloquently argues the ‘point’ that news organizations should increase the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to people in the United States. Goodman builds his argument by using facts and evidence, addressing the counterarguments, and couching it all in persuasive and compelling language.

Goodman begins the article by bombarding the reader with facts and statistics. He states that, according to a census conducted by the American Journalism Review, the number of full-time foreign news correspondents in the United States dropped from 307 in 2003 to 234 in 2011. In addition, the AJR survey also discovered that “the space devoted to foreign news [in American papers] had shrunk by 53 percent” in the last 25 years.

Beginning the article with all of these facts and figures has a couple of strengthening effects on Goodman’s argument. First, by starting out with hard evidence, Goodman lays the groundwork of his own credibility. He’s not just writing an opinion piece – his opinion is backed by the truth. This will bring the readers onboard and make them more likely to trust everything else he says. Second, because Goodman presents these facts without much explaining/interpreting, the reader is forced to do the math herself. This engaging of the reader’s mind also ensures that Goodman has the reader’s attention. When the reader does the math to find a drop of 73 full-time foreign news correspondents employed by US papers in just 8 short years, she will find herself predisposed to agree with Goodman’s call for more professional foreign news reporting.

In addition to employing facts to his argument’s advantage, Goodman also cunningly discusses the counterargument to his position. By writing about how social media and man-on-the-ground reporting has had some positive impact on the state of foreign news reporting, Goodman heads off naysayers at the pass. It would have been very easy for Goodman to elide over the whole issue of citizen reporting, but the resultant one-sided argument would have been much less convincing. Instead, Goodman acknowledges things like “the force of social media during the Arab Spring, as activists convened and reacted to changing circumstances.” As a result, when he partially refutes this counterargument, stating the “unease” many longtime profession correspondents feel over the trend of ‘citizen journalism’ feel, the reader is much more likely to believe him. After all, Goodman acknowledges that social media does have some power. Knowing that Goodman takes the power of social media seriously will make the reader more inclined, in turn, to take Goodman’s concern about the limits of social media seriously.

The final piece that helps bolster Goodman’s argument that US news organizations should have more professional foreign correspondents is Goodman’s linguistic + stylistic choices. Goodman uses contrasts to draw the reader deeper into his mindset. By setting up the contrast between professional reporters as “informational filters” that discriminate good from bad and amateur, man-on-the-spot reporters as undiscriminating “funnels,” Goodman forces the reader to view the two in opposition and admit that professional filters are to be preferred over funnels that add “speculation, propaganda, and other white noise” to their reporting. In addition, Goodman drives the reader along toward agreeing with his conclusion in the penultimate paragraph of the article with the repetition of the phrase “We need.” With every repetition, Goodman hammers even further home the inescapable rightness of his argument. The use of “We” more generally through the article serves to make the readers feel sympathetic towards Goodman and identify with him.

By employing the rhetorical techniques of presenting facts, acknowledging the other side, and using persuasive language, Goodman convinces the reader of his claim.

Answer:

“It's like the difference between a slow-crawling flood and an earthquake,” she says. “That water can do just as much damage."

Explanation:

it is a responsibility though??

The most ideal choice appears to be sure to be No important for the earth was protected from them, for, in the event that they wanted for a thing, they called it from the opposite side of the world.

By the Waters of Babylon is a brief tale by creator Stephen Vincent Benet distributed in 1937. The primary person, John, lives in a dystopian reality where society has gotten back to a crude state.

Urban communities are viewed as possessed by spirits, and metal is accepted to be reviled. John is a cleric and, thus, can go spots others are illegal to go.

After heading out to a Dead Place that used to be New York, John has a dream, a fantasy. It is uncovered to him that the creatures they accepted to have been divine beings were really individuals such as himself. That the Dead Places, presently so grave and "tormented", were once residing urban areas loaded with individuals.

For more information about By the Waters of Babylon , refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/1166829

Answer:

the correct answer is "No part of the earth was safe from them, for, if they wished for a thing, they summoned it from the other side of the world.”

Explanation:

No part of the earth was safe meaning they are exploiting natural resources.

In April 1963 King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) joined with Birmingham, Alabama’s existing local movement, the Alabama Christian Movement for Human Rights (ACMHR), in a massive direct action campaign to attack the city’s segregation system by putting pressure on Birmingham’s merchants during the Easter season, the second biggest shopping season of the year. As ACMHR founder Fred Shuttlesworth stated in the group’s “Birmingham Manifesto,” the campaign was “a moral witness to give our community a chance to survive” (ACMHR, 3 April 1963).

The campaign was originally scheduled to begin in early March 1963, but was postponed until 2 April when the relatively moderate Albert Boutwell defeated Birmingham’s segregationist commissioner of public safety, Eugene “Bull” Connor, in a run-off mayoral election. On 3 April the desegregation campaign was launched with a series of mass meetings, direct actions, lunch counter sit-ins, marches on City Hall, and a boycott of downtown merchants. King spoke to black citizens about the philosophy of nonviolence and its methods, and extended appeals for volunteers at the end of the mass meetings. With the number of volunteers increasing daily, actions soon expanded to kneel-ins at churches, sit-ins at the library, and a march on the county building to register voters. Hundreds were arrested.

On 10 April the city government obtained a state circuit court injunction against the protests. After heavy debate, campaign leaders decided to disobey the court order. King declared: “We cannot in all good conscience obey such an injunction which is an unjust, undemocratic and unconstitutional misuse of the legal process” (ACMHR, 11 April 1963). Plans to continue to submit to arrest were threatened, however, because the money available for cash bonds was depleted, so leaders could no longer guarantee that arrested protesters would be released. King contemplated whether he and Ralph Abernathy should be arrested. Given the lack of bail funds, King’s services as a fundraiser were desperately needed, but King also worried that his failure to submit to arrests might undermine his credibility. King concluded that he must risk going to jail in Birmingham. He told his colleagues: “I don’t know what will happen; I don’t know where the money will come from. But I have to make a faith act” (King, 73).

On Good Friday, 12 April, King was arrested in Birmingham after violating the anti-protest injunction and was kept in solitary confinement. During this time King penned the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” on the margins of the Birmingham News, in reaction to a statement published in that newspaper by eight Birmingham clergymen condemning the protests. King’s request to call his wife, Coretta Scott King, who was at home in Atlanta recovering from the birth of their fourth child, was denied. After she communicated her concern to the Kennedy administration, Birmingham officials permitted King to call home. Bail money was made available, and he was released on 20 April 1963.

In order to sustain the campaign, SCLC organizer James Bevel proposed using young children in demonstrations. Bevel’s rationale for the Children’s Crusade was that young people represented an untapped source of freedom fighters without the prohibitive responsibilities of older activists. On 2 May more than 1,000 African American students attempted to march into downtown Birmingham, and hundreds were arrested. When hundreds more gathered the following day, Commissioner Connor directed local police and fire departments to use force to halt the demonstrations. During the next few days images of children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses, clubbed by police officers, and attacked by police dogs appeared on television and in newspapers, triggering international outrage. While leading a group of child marchers, Shuttlesworth himself was hit with the full force of a fire hose and had to be hospitalized. King offered encouragement to parents of the young protesters: “Don’t worry about your children, they’re going to be alright. Don’t hold them back if they want to go to jail. For they are doing a job for not only themselves, but for all of America and for all mankind” (King, 6 May 1963).

In the meantime, the white business structure was weakening under adverse publicity and the unexpected decline in business due to the boycott, but many business owners and city officials were reluctant to negotiate with the protesters. With national pressure on the White House also mounting, Attorney General Robert Kennedy sent Burke Marshall, his chief civil rights assistant, to facilitate negotiations between prominent black citizens and representatives of Birmingham’s Senior Citizen's Council, the city’s business leadership.

Answer:

B. inconveniently

Explanation:

the closest synonym is inconveniently

Answer:

b, d, c, d, b, d, d, a, d, a

Explanation:

they just make sense

After Kublai Khan's (Successor of Genghis Khan and ruler of the Mongol Empire for over 30 years.) eventual demise in February 18, 1294, the Mongol Empire shattered into pieces. None of his successors were suited for the job that meant to rule the Mongol Empire, being unable to reach the stature their predecessor left for them. From 1300 and the years that went on, disputes over who would succeed the late Kublai Khan weakened the central government in China, causing frequent rebellion that would damage the Yuan Dynasty even more, eventually making it fall down to be nothing in 1368. The two main reasons being the class conflict caused by the heavy taxation, the other being the ethnic contradiction resulting from the 'Four Class System'.

Answer:

Thanks for letting me know. Now I know to not report you. Have a good day.

Answer:

answered in bottom

Explanation:

Were you get rained, for your future of outcome. school helps you get ready for your future.

The speech is an example of metatheatre as it allows the play speak for itself to depict the circumstances.

A metatheatre simply means the aspect of a play which draw attention to the circumstances of the performance.

In this case, the speech is an example of metatheatre as it allows the play speak for itself to depict the circumstances. This is common with Shakespeare's works.

Learn more about speech on:

https://brainly.com/question/25887038

Answer:

Cillians relationship with his mother

Explanation:

df

Answer: im so sorry i tried to translate it because it wasn't working

Explanation:

The author showed the struggle of the characters in "The Grapes of Wrath" by; advocating social change by indicating the unfair working conditions the migrants face when they reach California.

The Grapes of Wrath can be interpreted as a proletarian novel, advocating social change by showing the unfair working conditions faced by migrants when they reach California. The men who own the land there hold the power, and attempt to control supply and demand so that they can get away with paying poor wages.

Read more on The grapes of Wrath;

https://brainly.com/question/895499

Answer:

B. A character who plays a trick.

Explanation:

According to the excerpt given, the narrator describes his encounter with a strange being who called him and changed from a monster dragon to a man who was bowing to him. He described the man as wearing a crown in the shape of a dragon's head and his dress patterned with shells.

The element of a folktale that is displayed in this excerpt is a character who plays a trick because it is certain that the dragon changed to a man but still retained some aspects of himself in his new form and his plan was probably to trick the narrator.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Question:

The story below is culled from the "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass."

In the afternoon of that day, we reached Annapolis, the capital of the State. We stopped but a few moments so that I had no time to go onshore. It was the first large town that I had ever seen, and thought it would look small compared with some of our New England factory villages, I thought it a wonderful place for its size – more imposing even than the Great House Farm!

Which of these is a true statement about travel during Douglass's youth?

Answer:

It was a rare occurence for any slave to go beyond the perimeters of the plantation where they were required to work and even sleep sometimes.

So the trip to Baltimore was a great privilege, one that Frederick, who had lived most of his life on the farm, found to be a refreshing experience.

Cheers

Answer:

It was a rare occurence for any slave to go beyond the perimeters of the plantation where they were required to work and even sleep sometimes.

So the trip to Baltimore was a great privilege, one that Frederick, who had lived most of his life on the farm, found to be a refreshing experience.

Explanation:

i did it on Edge

Answer:The first sentence. If you can't select that then I am unsure

Explanation:

Incomplete question. I provided a brief about information and how it is presented to be easily understood.

Explanation:

Information generally refers to facts that are made available or presented to the desired audience.

Common forms of presenting information in a way that they would easily be understood include:

Answer:

2. rained

3. did not stop

4. carried

5. visited

6. stopped

7. climbed

8. walked

9. boarded

10. watched

11. listened

12. did not want

13. wanted

14. decided

15. ordered

Explanation:

This whole paragraph has to be in past tense form, so we have to put "-ed" after the end of each regular verb. Additionally, to describe a verb which the subject hasn't done, you use "did not <verb>". DO NOT put -ed after the verb because you already have the past tense form of do: "did."

Carlos and I arrived in San Francisco last Wednesday night at 9:00. The next day, it rained, but the weather did not/didn't stop us from sightseeing. We carried our umbrellas and visited Fisherman's Wharf. Then the rain stopped, so we climbed Telegraph Hill. We walked around there a bit, and then we boarded a bus to Baker Beach. We watched the sun set next to the Golden Gate Bridge, and we listened to the ocean waves. I was so tired, I did not/didn't want to stay out any longer. I wanted to go back to our hotel. On the way home, we decided to have dinner. Chinatown was the perfect spot. We ordered a "bird's nest" and red bean soup. It was delicious. Everything in San Francisco was amazing.

Answer:

Flashforward & Prince’s Point Of View

I wandered through the warmth of the desert until I could no longer. I had been traveling for years. Was I ever to find my Rapunzel again? I began to weep over my loss. Suddenly, I heard it. The sweetest music of my love’s voice. It was her. It had to be. I stumbled towards the voice. I heard her walking towards me, and felt her soft hand upon my face. She held me in her arms, and cried. Her bittersweet tears dripped from her eyes to mine. I stroked her face, hoping to visualize my sweet Rapunzel again.

Earlier  

There were once a man and a woman who had long in vain wished for a child. At length the woman hoped that God was about to grant her desire. These people had a little window at the back of their house from which a splendid garden could be seen, which was full of the most beautiful flowers and herbs. It was, however, surrounded by a high wall, and no one dared to go into it because it belonged to an enchantress, who had great power and was dreaded by all the world. One day the woman was standing by this window and looking down into the garden, when she saw a bed which was planted with the most beautiful rampion (rapunzel), and it looked so fresh and green that she longed for it, she quite pined away, and began to look pale and miserable. Then her husband was alarmed, and asked: 'What ails you, dear wife?' 'Ah,' she replied, 'if I can't eat some of the rampion, which is in the garden behind our house, I shall die.' The man, who loved her, thought: 'Sooner than let your wife die, bring her some of the rampion yourself, let it cost what it will.' At twilight, he clambered down over the wall into the garden of the enchantress, hastily clutched a handful of rampion, and took it to his wife. She at once made herself a salad of it, and ate it greedily. It tasted so good to her—so very good, that the next day she longed for it three times as much as before. If he was to have any rest, her husband must once more descend into the garden. In the gloom of evening therefore, he let himself down again; but when he had clambered down the wall he was terribly afraid, for he saw the enchantress standing before him. 'How can you dare,' said she with angry look, 'descend into my garden and steal my rampion like a thief? You shall suffer for it!' 'Ah,' answered he, 'let mercy take the place of justice, I only made up my mind to do it out of necessity. My wife saw your rampion from the window, and felt such a longing for it that she would have died if she had not got some to eat.' Then the enchantress allowed her anger to be softened, and said to him: 'If the case be as you say, I will allow you to take away with you as much rampion as you will, only I make one condition, you must give me the child which your wife will bring into the world; it shall be well treated, and I will care for it like a mother.' The man in his terror consented to everything, and when the woman was brought to bed, the enchantress appeared at once, gave the child the name of Rapunzel, and took it away with her.  

Rapunzel grew into the most beautiful child under the sun. When she was twelve years old, the enchantress shut her into a tower, which lay in a forest, and had neither stairs nor door, but quite at the top was a little window. When the enchantress wanted to go in, she placed herself beneath it and cried:

'Rapunzel, Rapunzel, Let down your hair to me.'

Rapunzel had magnificent long hair, fine as spun gold, and when she heard the voice of the enchantress she unfastened her braided tresses, wound them round one of the hooks of the window above, and then the hair fell twenty ells down, and the enchantress climbed up by it.

Rapunzel’s POV  

I was terrified when the strange man leaped through my window. I had never seen a man before. Our eyes met, then he spoke to me. That is when i knew; i was going to love this man.  

Gothel’s POV

I heard the snip of the scissors and the sound of my Rapunzel’s heart breaking. She had betrayed me, and had to pay for her bad behavior. I would miss her. Really. However, my job was nowhere near finished. I still had to eliminate her prince.  

Reasoning  

I chose the Flashforward and parallel plot techniques. Flashforwarding is a way to get the reader’s attention and have them want more or tp expect more. Parallel Plot helps to aid my understanding of each character in the story and their individual feelings.  

Explanation:

Answer:

The purpose of prewriting

Explanation:

The purpose of prewriting is to give the writer some time to come up with what they want to put down, it's kind of like brainstorming everything and jotting down things so that the writer can get more of a sense of what they are writing about.