Michael starts a new paper company. The function fff models the company's net worth (in thousands of dollars) as a function of time (in months) after Michael starts it.

Answer:

Okay, whats your question?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5.37ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of the square minus area of the circle, so...

Area of the square is 5x5=25

Area of the circle is pi*2.5^2=19.63

25-19.63=5.37ft^2

Answer:

4x + 5y = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

It is parallel to y = -4/5x + 6

Answer:

( 4x^2 -16x +16)

Step-by-step explanation:

The rule is the

the first term squared + (the first term * second term  * 2) + second term^2

Answer:

I thought it was 3, no wait its 2

Step-by-step explanation:

You are thinking of the Principia Mathematica, written by Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell. Here is a relevant excerpt:

Picture Below

As you can see, it ends with "From this proposition it will follow, when arithmetical addition has been defined, that 1+1=2." The theorem above, ∗54⋅43, is already a couple of hundred pages into the book (Wikipedia says 370 or so); the later theorem alluded to, that 1+1=2, appears in section ∗102, considerably farther on.

I wrote a blog article a few years ago that discusses this in some detail. You may want to skip the stuff at the beginning about the historical context of Principia Mathematica. But the main point of the article is to explain the theorem above.

The article explains the idiosyncratic and mostly obsolete notation that Principia Mathematica uses, and how the proof works. The theorem here is essentially that if α and β are disjoint sets with exactly one element each, then their union has exactly two elements. This is established based on very slightly simpler theorems, for example that if α is the set that contains x and nothing else, and β is the set that contains y and nothing else, then α∪β contains two elements if and only if x≠y.

The main reason that it takes so long to get to 1+1=2 is that Principia Mathematica starts from almost nothing, and works its way up in very tiny, incremental steps. The work of G. Peano shows that it's not hard to produce a useful set of axioms that can prove 1+1=2 much more easily than Whitehead and Russell do.

Answer:

The best answer would be the 25% off the entire purchase. Say for example Mrs. Walsh was willing to spend 100$ that would be 25% dollars she saved. But when it comes to save the most amount of money. If she spends under 60 dollars use the 15 dollars off. If it’s over 60 use the 25% off coupon

Answer:

See Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]p - 6 = 10[/tex]

Required

Write a statement for the expression

The statement is:

The cost of a grater is $6 less than the cost of an electric cooker, What is the of the electric cooker?

The above statement when translated to a mathematical expression is:

[tex]p - 6 = 10[/tex]

Where p represents the cost of the cooker

Solving for p.

[tex]p = 10 + 6 = 16[/tex]

Answer:

The word "of" in mathematical terms means multiplication. The word "is" means equal. This would be translated into 50% x 25% x X = or 0.50 x 0.25 x X =. 0.50 times 0.25 = 0.125. Putting 0.125 into a fraction, it would be 125/1000. Simplify this fraction to get 1/8. So, the answer would be A.

Answer:

-38

Step-by-step explanation:

-c + 6y

= -(2) + 6 (-6)

= -2+(-36)

= -2 - 36

= -38

Answer:

M=93/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

20 boys in the class

Step-by-step explanation:

40% of 50 is 20

Answer:

m=6

Step-by-step explanation:

38+8m+4=90

42+8m=90

8m=90-42

8m=48

m=6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Due to similarity in Tri ABC and ADE so,

[tex]\frac{AD}{AB} =\frac{DE}{BC} =\frac{AE}{AC}[/tex]

[tex]AE=28.2*\frac{20}{24} =23.5cm[/tex]

[tex]EC=AC-AE =28.2-23.5=4.7cm[/tex]

Answer:

.

1) 0.35 x 24 =8.4

2) 0.59 x 29 =17.11

3) 2.45 x 5 =12.25

4) 0.84 x 3 =2.52

5) 0.45 ×63=28.35

6) 3.54 x 0.59=2.0886

7) 5.28 x 1.18 =6.2304

8) 4.37 x 0.58 =2.5346

9) 7.05 * 0.52 =3.666

10) 2.36 x 1.28=3.0208

[tex]0.35 \times 24 = [/tex]=8.4

Answer:

1) 8.4

2) 17.11

3) 12.25

4) 2.52

5) 28.35 (if numbers are multiplied)

6) 2.0886

7) 6.2304

8) 2.5346

9) 3.666

10) 3.0208

Answer:

a. True

b. True

c. False

d. False

e. Both

Step-by-step explanation:

a.  Explanation: each triangle is composed of three interior angles and three sides which can be of the same length or different lengths

b.  Explanation: isosceles triangles always have two equivalent interior angles, and all three interior angles of any triangle always have a sum of degrees

c. Explanation: The sum of the measures of the angles is always 180 degrees so that means it is not possible.

d. Explanation: exterior angles of a triangle is greater than either of the measures of the remote interior angles so This is a fundamental result in absolute false because its Interior does not depend upon the Angles

e. Explanation: Eh, There's really no explanation for this So, It's both.

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

M = 70° ( base angles of isosceles triangles are equal)

Answer: M = 70° ( base angles of isosceles triangles are equal)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 101°

Step-by-step explanation:

15 + 25 + 39 + x = 180

79 + x = 180

x = 101

Answer:

CP = 17000

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

Loss = 10%

Selling price of the watch, SP = $15,300

We need to find the cost price of the watch.

[tex]CP=\dfrac{100}{100-L\%}\times SP\\\\CP=\dfrac{100}{100-10}\times 15300\\\\CP=17000[/tex]

So, the cost price of the watch is 17000.

Answer:

1/30

Step-by-step explanation:

When you multiply fractions, you just muliply across,

1*3= 3

9*10= 90

you now have 3/90 but you have to simplify, we know 3 goes into 3 and it also goes into 90 equally

3/3= 1

90/3= 30

So your answer is 1/30!!

I hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer:

Follows are the responses to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

Follows are the table to this question:

                                        [tex]positive \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ negative \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ total[/tex]

[tex]\text{strep value} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1281\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 219 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1500 \\\\[/tex]

[tex]\text{not the strep value} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 425 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 8075 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 8500 \\\\ \text{total} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1706 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 8294 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 10000 \\\\[/tex]

In point a:

[tex]P( \text{step and positive test}) = \frac{1281}{10000}=0.1281[/tex]

In point b:

[tex]P(\text{positive test}) =\frac{1706}{10000} =0.1706[/tex]

In point c:

[tex]P \text{(strep | positive test)} =\frac{1281}{1706} =0.7509[/tex]

Answer:

(A) Population data

(B) The figures

(C) The classification of votes by political party

Step-by-step explanation:

(A) These results summarize population data. The population is the total 3,889 voters from whom information was collected.

The samples would be

- Voters registered as Democrats  (1,633)

- Voters registered as Republicans  (1,206)

- Independent Voters  (1,050)

The total of members in each sample equals the total number of people in the population.

(B) A descriptive aspect of the result is the figures or percentages. They describe how (in percentage) voters penned their votes for Brown and how they penned their votes for Whitman. NOTE: To get the percentage or fraction of those who voted for Whitman, simply subtract the percentage of Brown's supporters from a total of 100%.

(C) An inferential aspect of the results is the classification of votes by different parties (the samples are the different parties involved here). This helps to infer the sources of support for Brown and the sources of support for Whitman.

For example, if the total votes for Brown (in population result analysis) are low, the Republicans are the major reason why!

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

you are dealing with area so you are going to want to multiply the length and the width

Answer:

its "fraction 1 over 2(10 × 6) = 30"

Step-by-step explanation:

i just took this text a week ago that the right answer not D

Answer\Step-by-step explanation:

0≤(x − y)^2 ⟹ 0≤x^2−2xy+y^2

                  ⟹ 2xy≤x^2+y^2

             ⟹ xy≤ x2+y2\2

                  ⟹ xy≤ x^2+y^2

since the clearly nonnegative real x^2+y^2

clearly satisfies x^2+y^2\2  ≤x^2+y^2.

The proof of the quadratic equation  (x-y)²=x²-2xy+y²​ is given.

For variable x : ax² + bx + c = 0, where a≠0 is a standard quadratic equation, which is a second-order polynomial equation in a single variable. It has at least one solution since it is a second-order polynomial equation, which is guaranteed by the algebraic basic theorem.

Given:

Quadratic equation

(x-y)²=x²-2xy+y²​

To prove the equation:

We substitute the value and see if LHS = RHS.

In the LHS,

LHS =  (x-y)²

LHS =  (2-1)²

LHS =  1

In the RHS,

RHS = x²-2xy+y²​

RHS = 4 - 4 + 1

RHS = 1

LHS = RHS​

Therefore, the theorem (x-y)²=x²-2xy+y²​ is proved.

To learn more about the quadratic equation;

https://brainly.com/question/17177510

#SPJ2