Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
Which phrase best completes the writer's explanation?
In the novella The Time Machine by H.G. Wells, the narrator expects that the future will be more advanced, but he
Instead encounters simple creatures: "As they made no effort to communicate with me, but simply stood round me
smiling and speaking in soft coolng notes to each other." However, I would propose that perhaps the creatures
communication was more advanced. Perhaps they
Reset
Next

Answer:

B, a persons soul

Explanation:

Answer: The sea was like a rippling blanket of brochure-blue. Squabbling seagulls flew overhead, harassing the beachgoers in their endless hunger. Gannets were dive-bombing the stretched surface of the sea far out from shore. The horizon was edged with a silver tint and a cormorant was flying into that place where sun and water meet. His wings were a blur of motion and he soon faded from sight. The opera of the sea washed over me and the wave-music was welcome.

Answer:

There is no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment. Contrary to a common misconception, most expression one might identify as “hate speech” is protected by the First Amendment and cannot lawfully be censored, punished, or unduly burdened by the government — including public colleges and universities.

Answer:

Explanation:

Hate speech is a controversial and often misinterpreted term for speech intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against an individual or a group of individuals based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability. The term has been taken to cover written as well as oral communication.

My starting position is that hate speech is not just one thing; there can be at least four categories of hate speech that we can address.

By the end of this essay I hope to have shown sufficiently which, if any, types of hate speech could be protected by the right of free speech.

Right to free speech and expression

Perhaps in a different era, the two could be seen as distinct, not just by name, but also in context.[1]

The right of free speech is a human, political or civil right recognised and appreciated by states and their citizens. It is the right to communicate one’s opinions and ideas using one’s body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. It was included in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.[2]

Although freedom of expression is sometimes used within an identical context, it nevertheless includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

Perhaps the most commonly cited definition is the one given by the United Nations in Art.19 of their UDHR[3] adopted in 1948.[4]

Along the same lines, Art.10 of theECHR[5]provides the right to freedom of expression, subject to certain restrictions that are “in accordance with law” and “necessary in a democratic society”.

It is important to appreciate that the two are largely intertwined, and to be read separately would be of no particular value or help. For the purposes of this essay, I shall regard the two rights as two faces on the same side of a coin.

Answer:

1. Glass is made by us from sand.

2. The bridge was built by them some years ago

3. Many houses were damaged by the fire.

4. A nice present was offered to me by my friend.

5. The handball was invented by The Germans.

Explanation:

Use examples below.

please click heart to give thanks :)

Answer:

1. Prologue (or Introduction): Explain the significance of your title, making clear why it is relevant to your life in particular. Introduce yourself gracefully to your reader and capture our attention. Include a brief description of this writing project and its purposes -- in your own words.  

2. What’s in a Name? Names are an integral part of who we are. They shape our sense of who we are. Explore your feelings about “the unity between [your]self and [your] name.” Are these the names you would have chosen for yourself? Surname, middle name, Christian name? Is there a story behind your naming? Someone famous, a family member, weird initials? Does your name have symbolic meaning? Is it ethnic or historic or literary? Did your parents consider other names? In short, how do you live with your name?

3. Personal Alphabet: Browse through a dictionary, looking for adjectives to describe yourself. Know the meaning of the words you select and be able to explain how each word you've chosen fits you. Choose at least one adjective for each letter of the alphabet. Be sure you choose the adjective form of words. For example, “excite” is a verb and “excitable” is an adjective. “Exciting” is a participle so it can be used as an adjective . . .BUT “excitable” and “exciting” mean very different things.

4. Likes / Dislikes List: Make two columns, one titled “Likes,” the other “Dislikes,” and list from ten to fifteen specific items in each column. Avoid naming specific classmates and teachers by generalizing. For example, “that mean teacher who's making me write an autobiography,” not my name!

5. Sensory Experiences: The five senses allow us to perceive whatever is tangible, or concrete. A sensory experience is something we can taste, touch, smell, see, or hear. For example, ice-cold water-melon, hot dogs sizzling over a charcoal fire, mosquito bites, fireworks, and the music of the ice-cream wagon are sensory experiences I associate with a Fourth of July picnic. Describe a specific time and place which recalls rich sensory experiences for you. Include at least two details that appeal to each of the five senses.

Explanation:

sorry if my answer is wrong

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

she dis not hace entender to look UPS to when she was growing up

Answer:

counterpoint

Explanation:

i mean I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be counterclaim but I hope this helps

debatable sounds right but this excerpt kinda helps explain why it's not:

an argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on.

Explanation:

its you're answer......................

Answer:

a lot of people don't bother to see the plastic and just throw it away in stead of recycle it

Answer:

how Anne truly feels about every situation.

Explanation:

I hope this helps :).

Answer:it is c

Explanation: my teacher told me

Answer:

A

Explanation:

if you notice he says "healthy and free" free meaning he can do what he wants

Answer:

An article about Kennedy written by a professional historian

Explanation:

An informative essay is a type of essay that aims to educate its readers on a certain topic.

When writing an informative essay, it's important that we use only correct information. This is why a person writing about John F. Kennedy should use an article about Kennedy written by a professional historian as a source. It's guaranteed that this type of article will include only facts.

However, there is no guarantee that a student's report about Kennedy would be correct. Both the memoir written by Kennedy's wife and a book titled Why John F. Kennedy Was America's Greatest President lack objectivity. They are influenced by their writers' opinions, beliefs, and feelings, which means that they are not based on facts.

This is why the third option is the correct one.

Answer:

what are the options???

Answer:

the victory came at a great cost

Explanation:

i got it right on IXL

Answer:

It's called

nuclear plants

Explanation:

That is called nuclear plants.

Answer:

The issue I chose to write about is frequently confused words. The language legends of that time only wanted English to be seen as a coherence. Someone who studies deep into the English Language and its past would be able to explain their view on these perplexing words. Though I would never alter it, I believe that a language rule can be broken or changed. Dr. Johnson “Those who have been persuaded to think well of my design, require that it should fix our language and put a stop to those alterations which time and chances have hitherto been suffered to make it without opposition.

With this consequence I will confess that I flattered myself for a while; but now begin to fear that I have indulged expectations which neither reason nor experience can justify.” Even though he was against the language changing; he knew it could never be stopped. “Like it or not, language is always changing and English will continue to do so in many creative and — to some perhaps — frustrating ways.” Jonathan Swift once said, “some method should be thought of for ascertaining and fixing our language, forever it is better a language should not be wholly perfect, than that it should be perpetually changing” from researching and reading his excerpts I believe his view of language changing was acceptance.

I would agree with his statements, but not completely because someone of a common mind would change the language to benefit only them and their selfish ways. Samuel Johnson also agreed with Swift to some extent, trying to preserve the language. They only wanted the English language to prosper and change for the better. Examining both sides of the argument I am only left to conclude that it is better for language to change. If we tried to stop the progression of language then we would not be able to get to the next level in everything that's dealing with language.

Language also changes very subtly whenever speakers come into contact with each other. There is no way it could be. I am only agreeing with it because I know it's not possible to stop the progression.

Explanation:

Answer:The issue I decided to expound on is much of the time confounded words. The language legends of that time simply believed that English should be viewed as a cognizance. Somebody who concentrates on profound into the English Language and making sense of their view on these confusing words past would be capable. However I could never modify it, I accept that a language rule can be broken or changed. Dr. Johnson "The individuals who have been convinced to respect my plan, expect that it ought to fix our language and shut down those modifications which time and chances have until now been endured to make it without resistance.

With this outcome I will admit that I complimented myself for some time; yet presently start to expect that I have reveled assumptions which neither explanation nor experience can legitimize." Despite the fact that he was against the language transforming; he realized it would never be halted. "Like it or not, language is continuously changing and English will keep on doing as such in numerous imaginative and — to some maybe — disappointing ways." Jonathan Quick once said, "some strategy ought to be considered for finding out and fixing our language, everlastingly it is better a language ought not be entirely great, than that it ought to never-endingly change" from exploring and perusing his portions I accept his perspective on language changing was acknowledgment.

I would concur with his assertions, however not totally on the grounds that person of a typical psyche would change the language to help just them and their childish ways. Samuel Johnson likewise concurred with Quick somewhat, attempting to save the language. They just maintained that the English language should thrive and improve. Analyzing the two sides of the contention I'm simply left to presume that it is better for language to change. On the off chance that we attempted to stop the movement of language, we wouldn't have the option to get to the powerful in all that is managing language.

Language likewise changes inconspicuously at whatever point speakers come into contact with one another. It is basically impossible that it very well may be. I'm just concurring with it since I know halting the progression is unrealistic.

Explanation: its the answer above, I just switched the words around so it doesn't get plagiarized

Answer: i'd say the answer is A

Explanation:

Answer:

D. In his book Sensory Insights, Dr. Joseph Badeem says that newborn infants are better able to distinguish color than most people believe (Badeem 25).

Explanation:

MLA (Modern Language Association) format is a list of guidelines used in the creation of scientific works related to language and literature. These guidelines include rules that should be applied when citing sources.

According to the MLA citation style, in-text citations should include the last name of the author and the number of the page from which a quote or paraphrase is taken. This information should follow the quote/paraphrase and be put in parentheses, just like in option D.