Answer:
the victory came at a great cost
Explanation:
i got it right on IXL
Which is a main reason Anne McClain hopes to be an example to young people?
Question 3 options:
She thinks everyone should be able to do what they are passionate about.
She believes there are not enough women in STEM professions.
She did not have engineers to look up to when she was growing up.
She enjoys being a mentor to others.
Answer:
she dis not hace entender to look UPS to when she was growing up
i have no clue what this answer is
Answer: i'd say the answer is A
Explanation:
Read the poem.
Song of the Open Road
by Walt Whitman
Afoot and light-hearted, I take to the open road,
Healthy, free, the world before me,
The long brown path before me, leading wherever I choose.
Henceforth I ask not good-fortune—I myself am good-fortune;
Henceforth I whimper no more, postpone no more, need nothing,
Strong and content, I travel the open road. . . .
From this hour, freedom!
From this hour I ordain myself loos’d of limits and imaginary lines,
Going where I list, my own master, total and absolute,
Listening to others, and considering well what they say,
Pausing, searching, receiving, contemplating,
Gently, but with undeniable will, divesting myself of the holds that would hold me.
I inhale great draughts of space;
The east and the west are mine, and the north and the south are mine.
I am larger, better than I thought;
I did not know I held so much goodness.
All seems beautiful to me;
I can repeat over to men and women, You have done such good to me, I would do the same to you.
I will recruit for myself and you as I go;
I will scatter myself among men and women as I go;
I will toss the new gladness and roughness among them;
Whoever denies me, it shall not trouble me;
Whoever accepts me, he or she shall be blessed, and shall bless me.
Read this line from "Song of the Open Road."
Healthy, free, the world before me,
What does the phrase "the world before me" mean in the poem?
The speaker feels ready to explore the world.
The speaker wants to show others the world.
The speaker has never seen the world's beauty.
The speaker feels the burden of carrying the world.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
if you notice he says "healthy and free" free meaning he can do what he wants
According to O'Connor, what do the eyes of a peacock's tale represent? a. The eyes of the church c. The conflict of faith and reason b. A person's soul d. The eyes of the law
Answer:
B, a persons soul
Explanation:
Which story premise is the best example of gothic literature?
Answer:
what are the options???
(CONVERSATION Practice)It's Friday evening. You have a two day holiday ahead. Discuss in a group and make a plain how you want to spend your weekend .Share your intention with the class
Explanation:
its you're answer......................
Which detail can a reader learn from the play The Diary of Anne Frank that the reader cannot learn from The Diary of a Young Girl?
how Anne feels about going into hiding in the annex
how Anne feels about different people in her life
how different characters behave when Anne is not present
how different characters behave toward Anne
Answer:
how Anne truly feels about every situation.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :).
Answer:it is c
Explanation: my teacher told me
What is this? I need help please
Pointing our the orher side's point of view is called the...
•counterpoint
•argument
•debatable
•none of the above
Answer:
counterpoint
Explanation:
i mean I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be counterclaim but I hope this helps
debatable sounds right but this excerpt kinda helps explain why it's not:
an argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on.
Garbage! It smells bad and looks disgusting. Most people prefer not to think about trash more than once a day when they "take it out." We in the United States get rid of a great deal of garbage. In fact, we throw away 40 percent of all garbage in the world. Therefore, it is important that we, as Americans, recycle.
Identify the argument in this passage.
Answer:
a lot of people don't bother to see the plastic and just throw it away in stead of recycle it
a student's report about Kennedy
a memoir written by Kennedy's wife
an article about Kennedy written by a professional historian
a book titled Why John F. Kennedy Was America's Greatest President
Answer:
An article about Kennedy written by a professional historian
Explanation:
An informative essay is a type of essay that aims to educate its readers on a certain topic.
When writing an informative essay, it's important that we use only correct information. This is why a person writing about John F. Kennedy should use an article about Kennedy written by a professional historian as a source. It's guaranteed that this type of article will include only facts.
However, there is no guarantee that a student's report about Kennedy would be correct. Both the memoir written by Kennedy's wife and a book titled Why John F. Kennedy Was America's Greatest President lack objectivity. They are influenced by their writers' opinions, beliefs, and feelings, which means that they are not based on facts.
This is why the third option is the correct one.
In what body must the impeachment of a federal official begin?Choose one of the topics listed below or a topic of your choice that is related to language issues and usage:
double negatives
"ain't" (See the controversy regarding the labeling of "ain’t" in Webster's Third New International Dictionary.)
incorrect or nonstandard verb forms
frequently confused words (fewer/less, infer/imply)
use of around and on to replace more specific prepositions such as about
Write an essay on the language issue you chose in which you explain the background of the issue and take a stance on regarding the usage rules related to the issue. Be sure your essay addresses the following points:
Explain the rule or language issue you chose.
Discuss if there are times when a language rule can be broken or changed.
Explain the views of language experts on this topic. Do they agree or conflict? Is the usage rule controversial?
Include the data on usage you gather from your interactions with friends or by listening to people on the radio or on TV.
Take a clear stance about the usage rules related to the issue you chose. If possible, specify which rules seem preferable in specific contexts. Clarify whether you think following the rule is important and under which circumstances it's best to follow the rule.
Insert your essay in the space provided.
Answer:
The issue I chose to write about is frequently confused words. The language legends of that time only wanted English to be seen as a coherence. Someone who studies deep into the English Language and its past would be able to explain their view on these perplexing words. Though I would never alter it, I believe that a language rule can be broken or changed. Dr. Johnson “Those who have been persuaded to think well of my design, require that it should fix our language and put a stop to those alterations which time and chances have hitherto been suffered to make it without opposition.
With this consequence I will confess that I flattered myself for a while; but now begin to fear that I have indulged expectations which neither reason nor experience can justify.” Even though he was against the language changing; he knew it could never be stopped. “Like it or not, language is always changing and English will continue to do so in many creative and — to some perhaps — frustrating ways.” Jonathan Swift once said, “some method should be thought of for ascertaining and fixing our language, forever it is better a language should not be wholly perfect, than that it should be perpetually changing” from researching and reading his excerpts I believe his view of language changing was acceptance.
I would agree with his statements, but not completely because someone of a common mind would change the language to benefit only them and their selfish ways. Samuel Johnson also agreed with Swift to some extent, trying to preserve the language. They only wanted the English language to prosper and change for the better. Examining both sides of the argument I am only left to conclude that it is better for language to change. If we tried to stop the progression of language then we would not be able to get to the next level in everything that's dealing with language.
Language also changes very subtly whenever speakers come into contact with each other. There is no way it could be. I am only agreeing with it because I know it's not possible to stop the progression.
Explanation:
Answer:The issue I decided to expound on is much of the time confounded words. The language legends of that time simply believed that English should be viewed as a cognizance. Somebody who concentrates on profound into the English Language and making sense of their view on these confusing words past would be capable. However I could never modify it, I accept that a language rule can be broken or changed. Dr. Johnson "The individuals who have been convinced to respect my plan, expect that it ought to fix our language and shut down those modifications which time and chances have until now been endured to make it without resistance.
With this outcome I will admit that I complimented myself for some time; yet presently start to expect that I have reveled assumptions which neither explanation nor experience can legitimize." Despite the fact that he was against the language transforming; he realized it would never be halted. "Like it or not, language is continuously changing and English will keep on doing as such in numerous imaginative and — to some maybe — disappointing ways." Jonathan Quick once said, "some strategy ought to be considered for finding out and fixing our language, everlastingly it is better a language ought not be entirely great, than that it ought to never-endingly change" from exploring and perusing his portions I accept his perspective on language changing was acknowledgment.
I would concur with his assertions, however not totally on the grounds that person of a typical psyche would change the language to help just them and their childish ways. Samuel Johnson likewise concurred with Quick somewhat, attempting to save the language. They just maintained that the English language should thrive and improve. Analyzing the two sides of the contention I'm simply left to presume that it is better for language to change. On the off chance that we attempted to stop the movement of language, we wouldn't have the option to get to the powerful in all that is managing language.
Language likewise changes inconspicuously at whatever point speakers come into contact with one another. It is basically impossible that it very well may be. I'm just concurring with it since I know halting the progression is unrealistic.
Explanation: its the answer above, I just switched the words around so it doesn't get plagiarized