What are the possible rational roots of x³ X² 10x 8 0?

Considering an inverse proportional relationship, you find k taking a point (x,y), and multiplying the values of x and y.

A proportional relationship is a function in which the output variable is given by the input variable multiplied by a constant of proportionality, that is:

y = kx

In which k is the constant of proportionality.

For an inverse relationship, the function is:

[tex]y = \frac{k}{x}[/tex].

Then:

k = xy.

Which means that to find k, you take a point (x,y), and multiply the values of x and y.

More can be learned about proportional relationships at https://brainly.com/question/10424180

#SPJ1

The length of the hypotenuse of the triangle as given is; √58 cm.

It follows from the task content that the triangle described in the task content is a right triangle with two other side lengths; 7cm and 5cm.

Hence, it follows from Pythagoras theorem that the length of the hypotenuse side of the triangle is;

Hypotenuse = √(5² + 7²)

Hypotenuse = √58 cm.

Read more on hypotenuse;

https://brainly.com/question/6653008

#SPJ1

Answer:

8s-8

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the distributive property: #(a-b) = #*a - #*b. In this case 8s - 8.

Hope it helps!

Answer:

8

−

8

hopes this help    

Step-by-step explanation:

8

(

−

1

)

8

−

8

Answer:

V=lwh

4x6x3

v=72

Answer:

72 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

for volume is pretty simple. All you have to do is multiply the length width and height of you're shape. Once you do that you get 72cm

Answer:

$0.2

Step-by-step explanation:

1% of $40

1/100 * 40

0.01 * 40 = $0.4

Half of $0.4

$0.4 / 2 = 0.2

Therefore, half of 1% of $40 equals $0.2

Answer:

1.2

Step-by-step explanation:

The other guy is wrong

I know because I checked

The least positive integer, written only by numbers 0, 1, and 2, which is divisible by 225 is 1,222,200.

A number (A) is divisible by another number (K) when the division of A by K, leaves a remainder of 0.

In the question, we are asked to find the least positive integer, written only by numbers 0, 1, and 2, which is divisible by 225.

Now, we need to know that the multiples of 225 end with 00, 25, 50, and 75.

So, to have a multiple with digits 0, 1, and 2, we need the last digits to be 00.

The smallest multiple of 225, ending with 00 is 225*4 = 900.

So, we need to have the least multiple of 900, with digits 0, 1, and 2.

We know that a multiple of 9, has a sum of its digit as 9.

The smallest multiple of 9, with digits 1, and 2, will be 12222.

Adding the last 00 to this, we get the least multiple as 1,222,200.

Thus, the least positive integer, written only by numbers 0, 1, and 2, which is divisible by 225 is 1,222,200.

Learn more about multiples and divisibility at

https://brainly.com/question/13009239

#SPJ4

Answer:

domain means -4,0,-2 and range is -2,2,1

Answer:

1st pic) 1 1/2

2nd pic) 40% * x = 35   l   x = 87.5

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 is half

so multiply by 2 to get the whole

3/4 * 2 = 6/4 = 1 1/2

Answer: Pick an x value like x = 2

Note that f(2) = 1 and g(2) = 2. This shows we've doubled the f(x) value to get g(x). Therefore k = 2.

Or you could pick on x = 4 to see f(4) = 2 and g(4) = 4. The output of f(x) has been doubled as well.

It doesn't matter what x is since we'll have this doubling effect go on. I recommend picking x values where the points on the blue graph land perfectly on a grid location. Something like x = 5 seems a bit tricky.

:

Answer:

mia

Step-by-step explanation:

mia: 10/6 per minute

shawn: 5/4 per minute

common denominator is 12, multiply by 2 and 3

20/12 lap per minute mia

15/12 laps per minute shawn

20 > 15

==========================================================

Work Shown:

The diagram is below.

In this diagram, we have KN and LM as opposite sides. For any parallelogram, the opposite sides are parallel (as shown by the arrow markers) and they are congruent to each other. In other words, KN and LM are the same length.

This means KN = LM and we can solve for x like so

KN = LM

3x-11 = x+15

3x-x = 15+11

2x = 26

x = 26/2

x = 13

Then we can find side KL

KL = 2x-4

KL = 2*13-4

KL = 26-4

KL = 22

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

first we divide both parties by 5 making it so that 1/6 =3 and then we multiply  by 6 to make it 6/6 = 18

The quantity of water left in the tank as described in the task content is; 111 l 220ml.

The tank described in the task content initially contains 200 liters, in which case, 1 liter corresponds to 1000ml.

Hence, when 88l 580ml was used, the remaining quantity of water is; 200l - (88l 580ml) = 111 l 420ml.

And finally, since 200 ml leaked, the quantity of water left is; 111l 220ml.

Read more on subtraction;

https://brainly.com/question/144291

#SPJ1

Answer: I don't know/ A. f(n) = 4 + 60n

60+4n=cost. Because the number of children is multiplied by the cost for each child

i would say f(n)=60 +4n but i am probably wrong

Step-by-step explanation: other brainly's

f(n) = 4n + 60...or f(n) = 60 + 4n

f(n)=60+4n that is the correct answer!!!!!!

Time taken by a pizza to get cooked [tex] =\tt 3 \frac{3}{4} \: minutes [/tex]

Number of pizzas with Giovanni = 3

Time that will be taken to heat up 3 pizzas :

[tex] =\tt 3 \frac{3}{4} \times 3[/tex]

[tex] = \tt\frac{4 \times 3 + 3}{4} \times 3[/tex]

[tex] =\tt \frac{12 + 3}{4} \times 3[/tex]

[tex] = \tt\frac{15}{4} \times 3[/tex]

[tex] = \tt \frac{15 \times 3}{4} [/tex]

[tex] = \tt \frac{45}{4} [/tex]

[tex]\color{plum} =\tt 11 \frac{1}{4} \: minutes[/tex]

Therefore, Giovanni will take [tex] \color{hotpink}\tt \bold{11 \frac{1}{4}} \: minutes [/tex] to heat up 3 pizzas.

Answer:

hope it helped have a good day mate

The system of inequalities can model Gabrielle’s situation is;

x + 2y ≤ 20

x + 2y ≤ 203x + 2y ≤ 21

It follows from the task content, that the inequalities which can be used to model Gabrielle's situation be determined.

By setting variables as follows;

Brownie:

Sugar = 1 cup

Eggs = 2

Cookie:

Sugar = 3 cups

Eggs = 2

x + 2y ≤ 20

x + 2y ≤ 203x + 2y ≤ 21

Learn more about inequality:

https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

The decision would be to fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence.

The formula is fx/n

To get fx we have to sum all of the values of x = 2430161

The total number in the data set = 35

Mean = 2430161/35

= 69433.17

This test is a left tail test.

sd = 8500

H0: u = 70000

H1 : U < 70000

z0.05 = 1.645

The decision would be to reject if z < critical value

Z= (69433.17 - 70000)/(8500/√35)

= -0.395

P-value can be gotten from the z score = 0.348

Given that the p value is > 0.05, we would have to fail to reject the null. The conclusion would be that there is insufficient evidence to support claim.

Read more on test statistics here:

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

Let, x^a =y......(1) and

y^b =z.....(2) and

z ^c =x......(3).

Now, using (1) in (2) we get,

x ^ab =z......(4).

Now, using (4) in (3) we get,

x ^abc =x

or, x ^abc =x ^1

or, abc=1.

Hope it will help :)

Step-by-step explanation:

hope the above solution will help you

Answer:

A- The distribution of differences between the sample means of each group has a mean at or near zero making it likely the two groups are not statistically different.

Step-by-step explanation:

The distribution of both the red and blue is identical although the skewness differs slightly. The distribution of the two groups is identical and their mean is near to zero. The distribution of observation of the group provides clear view that these two groups are not statistically different.

Las cuentas de Dmitri de menor a mayor se ordenan: retiro, cheques y ahorros.

Para organizar las cuentas bancarias de Dmitri de menor a mayor debemos observar cuidadosamente los valores de cada una. Adicionalmente para organizarlas por valor absoluto nos fijamos únicamente en el número sin tener en cuenta el símbolo, en ese caso el valor de cheques pierde su símbolo negativo.

Entonces las cuentas quedarían organizadas así:

Aprenda más sobre valor absoluto en: https://brainly.com/question/14091908

#SPJ1

Answer:

6(2p + 5)

Step-by-step explanation:

The largest common factor of 12 and 30 is 6.  Thus,

12p+30 = 6(2p + 5)

Answer:

12x +30=6(2x+5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the Greatest Common Factor (GCF)

GCF = 6

Factor out the GCF (Write the GCF first and then in parenthesis, divide each term by the GCF)

6(12p/6 + 30/6)

Simplify each term that is within the parenthesis

6(2p + 5)

(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If Sam has 4 times as many nickels as dimes and they have a combined value of 120 cents, how many of each coin does he have

We can say that if the term of arithmetic progression decrease in magnitude then the common difference must be negative.

An arithmetic progression is a sequence where every term is a sum of the previous term and a common difference.

If we suppose the first term of an arithmetic progression to be a, and the common difference to be d, then the arithmetic progression goes like this:

The first term, a₁ = a,

Second term, a₂ = a₁ + d = a + d,

Third term, a₃ = a₂ + d = a + 2d,

Fourth term, a₄ = a₃ + d = a + 3d, and it goes so on up to,

The n-th term, aₙ = aₙ₋₁ + d = a + (n - 1)d.

In the question, we are asked if the term of arithmetic progression decrease in magnitude then what can we say about the common difference.

As the magnitude of the term decreases, we can show that as:

The n-th term < The first term,

or, aₙ < a₁,

or, a + (n - 1)d < a,

or, a + (n - 1)d - a < a - a {Subtracting a from both sides},

or, (n - 1)d < 0.

Since, n > 1, (n - 1) > 0, thus we get the common difference, d < 0, that is, the common difference is negative.

Thus, we can say that if the term of arithmetic progression decrease in magnitude then the common difference must be negative.

Learn more about arithmetic progressions at

https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ4

its line a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A., B., C., and E.

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2021

The correct statements regarding the diagram include all the statements except: △RWS ≅ △UWT by AAS.

Given the image attached below, let's analyze each of the options given to determine whether they are correct or not.

Statement 1 is correct because based on reflexive property, ST in ΔRST is congruent to ST in ΔUTS.

Statement 2 is also correct because ∠RWS is vertically opposite to ∠UWT, so they are vertical angles.

Statement 3 is also correct because ΔRWS and ΔUWT have two pairs of congruent angles (∠SRW ≅ ∠TUW and ∠RWS ≅ ∠UWT) and one pair of non-included congruent sides (SR ≅ TU).

Statement 4 is incorrect because ΔRST and ΔUST do not have a pair of included congruent angles to meet the SAS Congruence Criterion.

Statement 5 is correct because since ΔRWS ≅ ΔUWT, ∠WTU ≅ ∠WSR based on the CPCTC theorem.

Learn more about congruence theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/2102943

Answer:

70%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the percentage, we divide the number by the total.

The amount of people who said they'd buy it again is 1260, and the total is 1800.

1260/1800=0.7.

This means that 70% were satisfied with the car.

Answer:

70% you just take the amount of people that were satisfies divided by the overall amount of people. you'll get e decimal but just move the decimal place to get the percent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its 180 !!