Answer:
The right approach is Option B. A further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
Throughout the adversarial system, these are some of the drawbacks of attorneys are that it should be built on 2 different accurately evaluate. The prosecutor and perhaps the prosecutor, whom individual or group this same defendant as well as the complainant, regarding facts provided by both parties whether individuals consider having been important to everyone's particular instance. Perhaps this could even be claimed that seeing who could outmaneuver their rival instead of simply finding the facts appears something of a match.All the other three solutions aren't connected to the situation in question. But the option above is accurate.
Answer:
Attorneys are often unequal in skills and expense
Explanation:
I put the other answer and got it wrong on edg.
¿Cuál de las siguientes es una lesión corporal que crea un riesgo sustancial de muerte o una desfiguración / deterioro permanente grave de cualquier miembro u órgano del cuerpo? *
A. Lesión corporal
B. Lesiones corporales graves
C. Fuerza
D. Fuerza mortal
Read the samples of Jim Crow laws below and answer the question. Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school. Books shall not be interchangeable between the white and colored schools, but shall continue to be used by the race first using them. Any instructor who shall teach in any school, college or institution where members of the white and colored race are received and enrolled as pupils for instruction shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in any sum not less than ten dollars ($10.00) nor more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each offense. How would the country be different today if "separate but equal" were still the law? Answer in complete sentences. Be sure to fully explain your response.
Answer:
How the country would be different today if "separate but equal" were still the law include:
1. The Jim Crow laws would have ensured the disunity of the United States, with the Confederation of American States (south) separate from the United States of America (north).
2. The United States would have been a laughing stock of other nations of the world. It would not be acting as a bastion of democracy and industrial development, as it could not be pushing for democracy in other countries without practicing what it preached.
3. There would have been continuous unrest in the Confederation of American States (US South) and human development would have been hindered a lot, because people of color would be in everlasting revolt in that part of the American continent.
Explanation:
The Jim Crow laws were laws from the pit of hell that enforced racial segregation in the Southern part of the United States. It was instituted between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 after the civil war and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s. According to one Nebraska record in 1911, marriages were illegal between a white person and a person of color. This depicts the extent of the cruelty that was hoisted on the country by the Jim Crow laws.
What is toxicology?
Toxicology is the study of the negative effects of
blank on living thing
Answer:
foreign fluids
Explanation:
coroners run a toxicology report when someone passes away to find any kind of drugs, alcohol or poisons in someone's system
Toxicology is the study of foreign fluids and not the study of the negative effects of blank on living things.
What is Toxicology?Toxicology is that branch of science that also helps in the understanding of the same. The most important thing is that Toxicology is that it talks about the harmful effects of the chemicals that are prevalent in society from time immemorial.
Toxicology thus talks about the various means and also the understandings based on the amount of poison that particular thing has got within itself. the other most important thing is that it has also talked about the understanding of the amount of harmfulness of the substance, particularly on some other substances.
Toxicology is thus defined by the amount of toxic or poison that is being generated.
Learn more about Toxicology here:
https://brainly.com/question/5020436
#SPJ2
Does the definition of first-degree murder vary from state to state? Explain your answer
Answer:
murdering in a different state
Explanation:
9893 and more murder
Answer:
Although the exact state laws defining first-degree murder vary by state, most state penal codes require that a prosecutor establish willfulness, deliberation, and premeditation in order to convict a defendant of first-degree murder. Willfulness requires that the defendant acted with the intent to kill another person.
Which phrase best completes the diagram of the credit approval process?
?
Customer fills
out credit
application
Lender reviews
applicant's
credit score
Lender
approves or
denies credit
A. Customer files for bankruptcy protections
B. Customer selects simple or compound interest
C. Customer makes first minimum monthly payment
D. Customer researches different credit cards
Answer: d
Customer researches different credit cards
Explanation:
A customer files out the credit application and the lender approves or denies the credit is due to the customer researching different credit cards. Hence the option D is correct.
What is a credit card?A credit card is a card or the plastic money hat can be used for purchasing and transferring the balances the card is needed for paying the loan amount and hence a minimum payment is need to be made every month. The credit card has various offers on various deals and hence can be used for getting cash backs
Find out more information about credit cards.
brainly.com/question/6872962
Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary?
Answer:
Reasonable Force The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. Reasonable force is a term associated with defending one's person or property from a violent attack, theft, or other type of unlawful aggression. It may be used as a defense in a criminal trial or to defend oneself in a suit alleging tortious conduct.
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
honorarium from an organization?
A. It could make the organization more likely to agree with the
lawmaker's opinions.
B. It could cause people to protest against the organization.
C. It could cause the lawmaker to join the organization as a private
citizen.
D. It could influence the lawmaker's view of the organization when
voting on new laws.
Answer:
A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.
In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.
Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.
Answer:
D. It could influence the lawmaker's view of the organization when voting on new laws