Which right is guaranteed by the Constitution?

Answer:

c

Explanation:

study island said so

The immediate result of the invention of the printing press is that the standardization of Modern English writing rules began.

A printing press serves as the mechanical device used in application of inked surface to write on paper.

Therefore, with invention of printing press, Modern English writing rules was set up.

Learn more about printing press at;

https://brainly.com/question/831806

Me das mas información ?Me

Answer:

Explanation:

The correct statement is "women’s political activism declined despite their gain of the right to vote."

The lives of the women took a massive forward leap in 1920. The women were given the right to vote, after the women's suffrage, in spite of their political activism declining.

Therefore the correct option is C.

Learn more about women in the 1920s here:

https://brainly.com/question/1323641

Answer:

Wampum

Explanation:

Wampum originally means white, which depicts the color of the beads used in making the Wampum.

Wampum is made from abalone or strings of clam-shells through the sizing of round pieces that appears like buttons or little, punch hole beads.

It was first used by the Native Americans as far back as the early sixteenth century.

Hence, in this case, the right answer is WAMPUM.

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine had been sought to prevent European intervention in the Western Hemisphere, but now the Roosevelt Corollary justified American intervention throughout the Western Hemisphere.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

It renamed itself to the Soviet union and it placed communism as its system of government

Answer:the second one I will say

Explanation:because during Mohammed’s life Islam was spread only from Mecca to Medina

Answer:

d

Explanation:

someone else said it was and it was right

Answer:

A.) Soviet I'm pretty sure.

Explanation:

hope this helped if I got it wrong then I'm sorry :)

Answer: The Palmer Raids were a series of raids conducted in November 1919 and January 1920 during the First Red Scare by the United States Department of Justice under the administration of President Woodrow Wilson to capture and arrest suspected leftists, mostly Italian immigrants and Eastern European immigrants

Explanation:

Answer:to arrest people who were thought to be radicals

Explanation:

world war 2

Explanation:

by far it still effects us in ways toady

Answer:

a church that does not go by the apiscopal way

Answer:

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Explanation:

Answer:

They Broke the Mold When they Made Ronnie." - Nancy Reagan

On the last day of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, as he was walking out of the White House to his limousine for the ride to the Capitol, a White House aide looked at the President, and with tears in his eyes quietly said: “There will never be another one like him.”

Every president is unique, of course, but there was just something special about the man. Yet even people who knew Ronald Reagan well often had difficulty describing him. Optimistic but not naïve. Articulate but not glib. Intelligent yet guided by common sense. Well mannered but never pretentious. Friendly but not a pushover. Charismatic but real. Principled but not intransigent.

He was all of that and so much more. Perhaps the key to understanding Ronald Reagan is to realize his two defining characteristics – he genuinely liked people, and he was comfortable with who he was. That may not sound like much, but when you’re President, it makes all the difference.

President Reagan never tired of meeting people. He genuinely enjoyed campaigning, not just because he could advocate for his political positions on key issues, but mostly because he enjoyed being with people. You could see it in his eyes. There was a certain sparkle when he shook hands and exchanged a few words. He was not just “going through the motions.” He listened to what people had to say, and thought about what he could do to help. Often when he was back in his car or on Air Force One, he would turn to an aide and say: “There was a man back there who…” describing the person’s plight and asking what could be done about it.

It did not matter to Ronald Reagan whether you were the CEO of a Fortune 50 corporation, or the janitor who cleaned the CEO’s office at night. Station in life, gender, race, physical appearance, age – he did not care about any of those. What he cared about was people’s feelings. One time he made a speech that was not his best. The next day, after reading critical newspaper articles, he told his staff: “They’re right. It wasn’t a very good speech, but the poor fella who wrote it worked his heart out, and I was worried he would feel bad if I changed it too much.”

As great a speaker as he was, and as inspiring as his spoken visions could be, Ronald Reagan was equally happy telling a joke to a small group in a social situation. He would be quite animated, and always laughed heartily at the punch line – eyebrows raised, eyes crinkled, head back -- his wide smile lighting up the room. Maybe it was the Hollywood part of him that made him feel good about having made his audience laugh. And he was not afraid to laugh at himself. At the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinners, no one enjoyed the comedians more when they poked fun at the President than the President himself.

He even found ways to be friends with political adversaries. Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill, an old-time Democratic pol from Massachusetts, would say all kinds of mean things about President Reagan. But rather than get angry or carry a grudge, the President invented a rule that Tip could say whatever he wanted during the day, but at 6 PM, the politics would stop and they would be friends. Nothing told the story of Ronald Reagan’s magnanimity more than pictures of those two old Irishmen swapping stories and laughing uproariously in the evening after a day of pretty intense verbal assaults.

Explanation:That’s why he never let ego get in the way. It was not always about him. On his desk in the Oval Office, President Reagan kept a small plaque with the words: “There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he does not mind who gets the credit.” He lived that in everything he did. Next to it was a sign that said: “It CAN Be Done.” The President kept it there to remind himself and visitors that in America, anything was possible – that we were limited only by our dreams.

It was Ronald Reagan’s happiness, his optimism, his enjoyment of life and his undying belief in the inherent goodness and spirit of the American people that got us to believe in ourselves again and put our country back on track. That, more than anything else, is the enduring legacy of the Presidency of Ronald Reagan.

Answer:

The Supreme Court view Maryland's taxing of the national bank created after the War of 1812 as INTERFERENCE to the United States Constitution

Explanation:

Following Maryland's taxing of the national bank branch in Baltimore, the Supreme Court eventually ruled on the case that

1. the United States has the authority under the US Constitution to commission a national bank anywhere in the country and;

2. any state law against the Congress law passed under the US Constitution (such as Maryland taxing a branch of the national bank) is an INTERFERENCE to the United States Constitution

Answer:

France suffered more severe economic problems than the American colonists. Both the American and French revolutionaries issued documents declaring independence.

Explanation:

Answer:

He created music for all occasions and concert settings like the ballroom, theatre, concert halls, cathedrals, and more. hope this helped

Answer:

Any occasion

Explanation:

R u a bfb fan? Plz answer my most recent question because i need a menu with prices for gelatin's steakhouse for math because im behind in math :(

Beginning with George Washington’s presidency, the United States sought a policy of isolationism and neutrality with regards to the internal affairs of other nations. Early American political leaders argued that with the exception of free trade, self-defense and humanitarian emergencies, the U.S. would do best to avoid permanent alliances that do not serve American interests but instead deflect attention from domestic issues. When World War I broke out in July 1914, the United States actively maintained a stance of neutrality, and President Woodrow Wilson encouraged the U.S. as a whole to avoid becoming emotionally or ideologically involved in the conflict. Americans were more than happy to stay out of the war, and Wilson won a second Presidential term in 1916 by running on a platform of non-interference; the phrase, “he kept us out of war” became a popular slogan used by Wilson’s supporters.

Upon re-election, Woodrow Wilson was resolute in staying out of a war, even as a significant movement within the American government advocated for preparedness in the face of events that signified growing German international aggression—such as the sinking of the British ocean liner Lusitania by a German submarine, which claimed the lives of many Americans. After several years observing these and similar acts of aggression by the Germans, Wilson—a political scientist by profession—began to change his viewpoint as he saw that the devastating war in Europe was threatening to spill across the Atlantic Ocean. With massive loss of life came a moral imperative that could no longer be ignored, requiring the United States to take a leadership role in maintaining and promoting freedom, sovereignty and self-determination for all nations. Wilson began making public statements that framed the war as a means to right the wrongs in the world rather than simple military posturing. Thus, the United States’ intervention in the First World War or, the “Great War,” helped shape the nation’s status as a self-proclaimed defender of freedom and democracy worldwide and radically altered U.S. foreign policy.

Answer:

D. slow, dotted rhythm

Explanation:

Answer:

India became politically unified under British hegemony. It also brought administrative unity inside the country. ... It created awareness among Indians that this vast united India belong to them and by way, created nationalism within them.

Explanation:

Answer:

rich and complex set of research issues (Bailenson, Shum,

Atran, Medin, & Coley, 2002; Medin, Ross, Atran, Bur-

nett, & Blok, 2002). In the present article, we examine

some of these in the context of judgments about global

geography. Specifically, we address how some biases in

global location judgments can be attributed to the cat-

egorical nature of geographical representations and the

processes that use them, whereas others are attributable to

cultural asymmetries in geographical knowledge.

Our previous research with Canadian participants

(Friedman & Brown, 2000a, 2000b; Friedman, Brown, &

McGaffey, 2002) indicated that their location estimates for

cities in the old and new worlds were based on a category-

driven system of plausible reasoning (Collins & Michal-

ski, 1989). Geographic categories were psychologically

distinct regions that could be independently influenced

by new information. Some countries had more than one

region, and some regions comprised either one or several

countries. The plausible reasoning framework assumes

that biases in judgments about global locations are mul-

tiply determined because they are influenced by accurate

and inaccurate beliefs about geographic regions acquired

over the lifespan from a variety of sources.

The key features of the data (Friedman & Brown, 2000a,

2000b) were that (1) Canadian participants divided North

America into four distinct regions (Canada, the northern

U.S., the southern U.S., and Mexico), (2) there were usu-

ally large boundary zones (gaps) between regions, (3) there

was little north–south discrimination among the estimates

within most regions, and (4) the estimates became more

biased as the cities’ actual locations were farther south.

Indeed, the average location estimate for most Mexican

cities was near the equator, which was an error of approxi-

mately 1,500 miles.

These four observations are consistent with the influ-

ence of categorical information on location estimates

(Brown, 2002; Friedman

Answer:

1. The federalist party

2. Democratic-Republicans

3. The federalists wanted a strong central government, whereas democratic republicans favored the rights of the people and states rights.

Explanation:

Answer:

Communism is a political and economic ideology that positions itself in opposition to liberal democracy and capitalism, advocating instead for a classless system in which the means of production are owned communally and private property is nonexistent or severely curtailed.

the existing communist states in the world are in China, Cuba, Laos and Vietnam. These communist states often do not claim to have achieved socialism or communism in their countries but to be building and working toward the establishment of socialism in their countries.

One of the first significant wells in Texas was developed near the town of Oil Springs, near Nacogdoches.

Answer:

Oil Springs, Nacogdoches County, Corsicana oilfield

Explanation:

When: Summer of 1894

Where: The Corsicana oilfield

One of the first significant wells in Texas was developed near the town of Oil Springs, near Nacogdoches. The site began production in 1866. The first oilfield in Texas with a substantial economic impact was developed in 1894 near Corsicana. In 1898, the field built the state's first modern refinery.

Answer:

Banks provided loans to trading companies.

Explanation: