Which statement best describes how due process has been applied in Supreme Court rulings?

The Supreme Court has ruled defendants have a right to due process under the law and cannot be denied the right to an attorney, nor illegal evidence used against them.

Explanation:

Which statement describes an effect of economic dominance on society?

A. Economic dominance encourages education systems to impart moral values to people

B. Economic dominance allows people to spend more time with there families

C. Economic dominance causes education systems to channel there efforts into imparting skills for the job market

D. Economic dominance has led the government to mold its working methods to increase costs

Which of the following is an example of passive income

If a taxpayer's 2020 household income of $60,000 places the taxpayer at 350% of the federal poverty level, what is the taxpayer's normal expected contribution when calculating the refundable tax credit for which the taxpayer may be eligible under the PPACA to purchase a qualified health plan?

In this type of negligence, both parties are found to be equally at fault and therefore neither side can recover damages.

the development of fundamental rights protection in the EU

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST AND 30 points!!! asap pls

Which position do proponents of situational crime prevention hold in terms of criminal disposition?
A.
They accept the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
B.
They reject the idea that people have criminal dispositions.
C.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in troubled homes.
D.
They believe that criminal dispositions are prominent in people raised in low-income families.

HELP PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

What does the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act do?


It limits the data that websites aimed at children above 13 can collect.


It limits the data that children under 13 can access.


It lets children under 13 access only educational sites.


It limits the data that websites aimed at children under 13 can collect.

Interview Question Legal Illegal How many times a month were you late for work at your last job? Do you have any mental illnesses? What year did you graduate from high school? Did you graduate from high school?

What happens when a case is reversed and remanded?
A. the respondent wins and the case is ended
B. the case is returned to the lower court for further action
C. the petitioner wins and the case is ended

Gender Equality at workplace

should hate speech be regulated? (in a essay)

Public safety! Answer please

As a rule, the judges can and do make different decisions in cases before them by distinguishing previous cases that might have applied before’. Which law tradition does NOT belong to this principle mainly?

Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement influenced the trends shown in
the line graph?
A. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of state governments.
B. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of the federal govemment.
C. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy
D. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in traditionally male-dominated fields

Need help on 6 no retakes

When the father of Stephen and Chris Nuss died, the two boys, aged 15 and 12 years, began to work the family farm. While the boys were still under the age of majority, their mother, Lois, kept the books Page 727for the farm. As the boys grew older, they took more and more responsibility in running the farm. They also rented and worked additional acres of farmland. They financed these rental agreements on their own, but their mother co-signed for the arrangements. The boys also purchased additional farmland. Again, their mother helped in this purchase by co-signing. When Chris decided to leave farming, Stephen paid him $100,000, and in exchange, Chris signed over the deed to the newly purchased land. Lois was not involved in this transaction. Stephen’s farming business grew. He eventually amassed more than 1,200 acres. He and his wife, Linda, kept their own financial records and maintained their own checking account for the running of the farm. Stephen’s mother was not involved in any of this detail. However, Stephen continued to pay many of the expenses involved on the original farm, where his mother still maintained her residence. Stephen also paid the insurance, maintenance, and repair expenses on all buildings and equipment on the original farm. Because Stephen continued to farm this land, in addition to the land he had subsequently purchased, these payments were always characterized as rent. No other payments went to Stephen’s mother. When Stephen died, Linda, his widow and executor, claimed that a partnership existed and that the farm equipment on the original acreage and original acreage itself belonged to that partnership. Lois argued that no partnership between Stephen and her existed. Is Linda or Lois correct? Did a partnership exist? Explain. [See: In re Estate of Nuss, 646 N.E.2d 504 (OH).]

opening mail for someone else​

what is the longest river​