Answer:
$54.67
Step-by-step explanation: sorry if im wrong i tried
Here are two expressions with a missing number -5/9
Please simplify the following trigonometric identity.
[tex]\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sec\alpha-\tan\alpha}[/tex]
Examining the question:
We are given the expression:
[tex]\frac{1}{Sec(\alpha)-Tan(\alpha)}[/tex]
We know from Basic trigonometry that:
[tex]Sec(\alpha) = \frac{1}{Cos(\alpha)}[/tex]
[tex]Tan(\alpha) = \frac{Sin(\alpha)}{Cos(\alpha)}[/tex]
Simplifying the expression:
Replacing these values in the given expression, we get:
[tex]\frac{1}{\frac{1}{Cos(\alpha)} -\frac{Sin(\alpha)}{Cos(\alpha)} }[/tex]
Since the denominator of both the values in the denominator is the same:
[tex]\frac{1}{\frac{1-Sin(\alpha)}{Cos(\alpha)} }[/tex]
We know that [tex]\frac{1}{\frac{a}{b} }[/tex] = [tex]\frac{b}{a}[/tex], using the same property:
[tex]\frac{Cos(\alpha)}{1-Sin(\alpha)}[/tex]
and we are done!
Answer:
cos a
---------------------
1 -sin (a)
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that sec a = 1/ cos (a) and tan a = sin (a) / cos (a)
1
---------------------
1/ cos (a) -sin (a) / cos (a)
Multiply the top and bottom by cos (a)
1* cos a
---------------------
( 1/ cos (a) -sin (a) / cos (a)) * cos a
cos a
---------------------
1 -sin (a)
There are 64 pencils in a pack. Mr. Math is the only teacher to give out pencils on day one and
he gave out 33 pencils. The math department wanted to decide how many total pencils there
are left in the school. Using p for the number of cases of pencils and t(p) for total number of
pencils, write an equation to determine the total number of pencils?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
0 1
3 3 ⟌ 6 4
- 0
6 4
- 3 3
3 1
Please help meee im being timed on thisss
Answer:
y=0.25x
We can think of k as an unknown number.
8×_=2.00
12×_=3.00
20×_=5.00
If we divide 2 with 8 we are left with 0.25.
It's the same for the other numbers so we know the constant is 0.25.
When we use the formula y=0.25x with the numbers above, it is correct.
8×0.25=2.00
12×0.25=3.00
20×0.25=5.00
Graph the compound inequality on the number line. x < -5 or x>0
the answer is in the image look at the image to see
I need help please help
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
use the formula A=pi*r^2 to find the answer
Answer:
34.54 ft2
Step-by-step explanation:
You could figure it out by simply it
1
_ x 5 Please explain
4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
25
For the following right triangle, find the side length x.
Ryan earns $20 for every lawn that he mows.
Which set of ordered pairs represents the relationship between the number
of lawns Ryan mows and the money he earns?
Oa. (20,1),(40,2), (60, 3) Ob.(1, 20), (2, 40), (3, 60)
Oc. (0,20), (1, 40), (2, 60) Od. (1, 20), (2, 30), (3, 40)
Answer:
A is the correct answer
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
The first number should represent the lawns, and the second should represent the money he makes on each lawn.
A is incorrect because the numbers are swapped; Ryan does not earn one dollar for mowing 20 lawns.
C is wrong because if Ryan mows zero lawns, how can he make money. Although the multiplication is correct, it does not start at zero.
D is wrong because it is counting the price up by ten instead of adding 20.
B is right because every lawn is 20 more dollars, and that is what is shown.
Which range best describes the possible number of cells in one organism , from the very smallest organism to the very largest ?
Answer:
ant to a wale
Step-by-step explanation:
i need help ////////
Answer:
[tex]1\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 7920 feet
2[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 13200 feet
3[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 18480 feet
4[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 23760 feet
5[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 29040 feet
6[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 34320 feet
Explanation:
1 mile = 5280 feet
[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] miles = 2640 feet
to convert miles into feet, multiply the whole numbers by 5280 and add 2640 to find your overall feet
2[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] : 2 x 5280 + 2640 = 13200 ft
3[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] : 3 x 5280 + 2640 = 18480 ft
4[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] : 4 x 5280 + 2640 = 23760 ft
5[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] : 5 x 5280 + 2640 = 29040 ft
6[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] : 6 x 5280 + 2640 = 34320 ft
A builder is buying property where she can build new houses. The line plot shows the sizes of the lots for each house. How many acres does the builder buy? *
X. X. X
X X. X
X. X. X
X. X x
X. X x
X 2/6 3/6
X
X
X
X
X
1/6
Answer:
can you send me a pic of how it looks because it's confusing to understand
Lenny took three of his textbooks home one night. He wanted to find how much his backpack weighed.
Which of these units is MOST appropriate for measuring the weight of Lenny’s backpack?
Answer:
Pounds.Step-by-step explanation:
Who in the holy dimension is gonna measure the weight of a bag in ounces and grams? Tons are just not even close to... Do you know how much a ton is? OHMY.
1 GRAM = 0.00220462 Pound
1 OUNCE = 0.0625 Pound
1 POUND = 16 Ounces
1 TON = 2000 Pounds
You wana carry a 2000 pound bag? I dont think so.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GL :)
Please help me I don’t understand
8 x 4 using distributive property with addition
Answer:
The answer is 32
That's easy
What is the product of 3.28 and 2.9
Answer:
9.512
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiplication = Product
The credit scores of 35-year-olds applying for a mortgage at Ulysses Mortgage Associates are normally distributed with a mean of 600 and a standard deviation of 125. (a) Find the credit score that defines the upper 20 percent. (Use Excel or Appendix C to calculate the z-value. Round your final answer to 2 decimal places.) Credit score (b) Eighty-five percent of the customers will have a credit score higher than what value
Answer:
a) The credit score that defines the upper 20% is 705.
b) Eighty-five percent of the customers will have a credit score higher than 470.38.
Step-by-step explanation:
Normal Probability Distribution:
Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
Mean of 600 and a standard deviation of 125.
This means that [tex]\mu = 600, \sigma = 125[/tex]
(a) Find the credit score that defines the upper 20 percent.
This is the 100 - 20 = 80th percetile, which is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.8. So X when Z = 0.84.
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]0.84 = \frac{X - 600}{125}[/tex]
[tex]X - 600 = 0.84*125[/tex]
[tex]X = 705[/tex]
The credit score that defines the upper 20% is 705.
(b) Eighty-five percent of the customers will have a credit score higher than what value?
This is the 100 - 85 = 15th percentile, which is X when Z has a pvalue of 0.15. So X when Z = -1.037.
[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
[tex]-1.037 = \frac{X - 600}{125}[/tex]
[tex]X - 600 = -1.037*125[/tex]
[tex]X = 470.38[/tex]
Eighty-five percent of the customers will have a credit score higher than 470.38.
This is Adele’s solution for the equation.
x² - 8x – 33 = 0
Step 1: x² - 8x = 33
Step 2: x² - 8x + 16 = 33 + 16
Step 3: (x – 4)² = 49
Step 4: x – 4 = 49 OR x – 4 = - 49
Step 5: x = 53 OR x = - 45
Where did Adele make her mistake? What are the solutions to this equation? Show all of your work.
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Answer: She messed up in Step 1
She first should of tried to factor it first. There she can see that 3 and -11 work together in order to get (x+3)(x-11)
x= -3 and x=11
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>
- Zack Slocum
*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆**☆*――*☆*――*☆*――*☆
Step-by-step explanation:
Here is the equation in factor form;
x²-8x-33=0
( x-11) ( x + 3)=0
x-11=0
x +3= 0
x=11
x= -3
ans= She messed up in step 1.
A football player ran for 11 yards. how many inches did the football player run?
Answer: 396 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's remember that for every yard there are 36 inches
there are 11 yards total
so we need to multiply 36 by 11
36x11
396 inches
Answer:
396 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
You multiply the number of inches for every yard (36) by the total number of yards
11*36=396
This is due today please help me
Answer:
Not similar
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
SAS
Step-by-step explanation:
Eliminate the choices.
Not SSS, as you are only given 2 out of 3 side lengths, and you need an angle measure to find the third length
Not AA, since we cant be sure
But seeing as there is one angle that corresponds for both triangles and are in-between two sides, it would be SAS (its not good to pressume, but thats all you can do )
Isabelle was curious if sample maximum was an unbiased estimator of population maximum. She started
with a large normally distributed population of test scores whose maximum was 99 points.
She then took a random sample of 6 tests and calculated the maximum of the sample. She replaced those
tests and repeated this process for a total of 40 trials. Her results are summarized in the dotplot below,
where each dot represents the maximum score from a sample of 6 tests.
HHH
HU
75
80
85
90
95
100
Sample maximum
Answer: sample maximum appears to be biased estimator since it consistently underestimated the population maximum
Answer: Sample maximum appears to be biased estimator since it consistently underestimated the population maximum.
Step-by-step explanation:
Which statement is not true about the pattern shown?
2/3 4/6 8/12 16/24
A-Each fraction is greater than the previous fraction.
B-Each fraction is equal to the previous fraction in the pattern multiplied by
C-Each fraction is equivalent to 2/3
D-The next fraction in the pattern is 32/48
Answer:
The answer is A-Each fraction is greater than the previous fraction.
Step-by-step explanation:
To prove that A is wrong, first simply all fractions.
2/3 is already simplified.
4/6 can reduce to 2/3, which already proves that A is wrong.
So, because 2/3 and 4/6 are equal fractions, and A says that each fraction is greater than the previous one, A is wrong.
I need help on this 1+s=3
Answer:
s = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
3 - 1 = 2
1 + 2 = 3
Hopefully this helps :3 Sorry if wrong :( Plz mark brainiest if correct :D Your bootiful/handsome! Have a great day luv <3
-Bee~
ill mark brainlist plss help
What is the area, in square inches, of the trapezoid below?
Answer:
area = 96.22 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
area of rectangle = 6.8 x 5.7 = 38.76
area of right side triangle = 1/2(8.4)(6.8) = 28.56
area of left side triangle = 1/2(8.5)(6.8) = 28.9
38.76 + 28.56 + 28.9 = 96.22
In a hardware store I bought 5 screws costing
20 ¢ each and 3 light bulbs costing $3.99 each
If I paid with two $10.00 notes, how much
change did I receive?
Answer:
7.02
Step-by-step explanation:
20 ¢ x 5 = 1.00
3 x 3.99 = 11.97
11.97 + 1.00 = 12.97
20.00 - 12.97 = 7.02
giving the brainliest answer to who can ever help me out!!! AND has the correct answer need help asap!
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
your answer should be B because isosceles triangles always have 2 equal sides :))
I really don't know how to solve this because when you plot points there's usually only 2 points to plot not 3.
Determine whether the graph shows a positive correlation, a negative correlation, or no correlation. If there is a positive or
negative correlation, describe its meaning in the situation
Answer:
umm im not really sure about that
Pineapple Corporation (PC) maintains that their cans have always contained an average of 12 ounces of fruit. The production group believes that the mean weight has changed. They take a sample of 15 cans and find a sample mean of 12.05 ounces and a sample standard deviation of .08 ounces. What conclusion can we make from the appropriate hypothesis test at the .01 level of significance
Answer:
We accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the mean weight of the cans is still of 12 ounces of fruit.
Step-by-step explanation:
Pineapple Corporation (PC) maintains that their cans have always contained an average of 12 ounces of fruit.
This means that the null hypothesis is: [tex]H_0: \mu = 12[/tex]
The production group believes that the mean weight has changed.
This means that the alternate hypothesis is:
[tex]H_a: \mu \neq 12[/tex]
The test statistic is:
[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
12 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that [tex]\mu = 12[/tex]
They take a sample of 15 cans and find a sample mean of 12.05 ounces and a sample standard deviation of .08 ounces.
This means, respectibely, that [tex]n = 15, X = 12.05, \sigma = 0.08[/tex]
Value of the test statistic:
[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = \frac{12.05 - 12}{\frac{0.08}{\sqrt{15}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = 2.42[/tex]
Pvalue of the test:
We are testing if the mean is different from a value, which means that the pvalue is 2 multiplied by 1 subtracted by the pvalue of z = 2.42.
Looking at the z-table, z = 2.42 has a pvalue of 0.9922
1 - 0.9922 = 0.0078
2*0.0078 = 0.0156
What conclusion can we make from the appropriate hypothesis test at the .01 level of significance?
0.0156 > 0.01. This means that at the 0.01 level, we accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the mean weight of the cans is still of 12 ounces of fruit.