According to Clemenceau , if the Germans had been totally crushed then they would have become so weakened that they would never have the power to fight other countries.
Why did Clemenceau want Germany crushed?This was due to the the threat that the Germans posed in Europe during the periods of war. According to him the Germans were a threat to France and he wanted them weakened for this.
He believed that the French country was not going to be safe till Germany was crippled and made to pay a lot of money to Belgium and France.
Read more on Clemenceau here: https://brainly.com/question/1362844
What happens when a president does not return a bil in 10 days and what is the exception to
that rule?
TRUE or FALSE: The tax on molasses and sugar (The Sugar Act of 1764) was popular with the colonists and they liked it.
On June 10, 1821, Moses Austin began his colony in Texas. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
Answer: FALSE
Explanation:Moses Austin died of a pneumonia on this day
How did Rome become the center of Christianity instead of Jerusalem
Answer:
In 313 CE, the emperor issued the Edit of Milan, which granted Christianity- as well as most other religions- legal status. While this was an important development in the history of Christianity, it was not a total replacement of traditional Roman belief with Christianity
Who overthrew the Sumerians?
the Egyptians
armies from Crete
the Amorites and Elamites
the Canaanites
Answer:
The egyptians, because they wanted their land I believe
The Amorites and the Elamites ^-^
hope this helps (can I have brainliest?)
Christian scripture states that
a. Mary Magdalene betrayed Jesus
b.Jesus rose from the dead
c.the Romans tried to save Jesus
d.Jesus' practicing was dangerous
What made the land route to Asia difficult prior to 1492?
a - bands and thieves
b - hostile Ottoman Warriors
c - The land route was poorly established
Answer:
.C
Explanation:
it was hard to get across
Which of the following STEM discoverers is known for his studies of the universe?
Answer:
Stephen Hawking
Explanation:
First man who came to mind, he has made many discoveries about black holes and the Universe and has a famous book.
Which of the following technological advancements made the events in the passage possible for the Ottomans
Armour
Cannon
Compass
Harness
Answer: I think its compass
Explanation:
Maybe
Answer:
its B
Explanation:
google it if you dont believe me....
how did the 3 religions begin
Answer:
If you are talking about the big 3 religions, Chritianity, Hinduism, and Islam the beginnings are all different.
Explanation:
Christianity with its roots in Judaism, began in the 1st century A.D. after Jesus died in the Roman Empire, it was spread by many of his disciples and other apostles, however, there was a period of time Christians were persecuted. Hinduism started in India in 1500 BC, it is said that this religion was brought by the Aryans. Islam, rooted in both Judaism and Christianity started in 7th century Mecca by Muhammed Ali.
According to the Colonization Law of 1824, each Mexican state could set up their own immigration policies.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
T
F
Need this pretty fast
Answer:
true
Explanation:
i got it right on my practice test
Answer:
This is true.
Under Lenin, some of the leaders of the Communist government
privately disagreed with the direction of the revolution.
were not allowed to disagree with one another.
called for a return to the capitalist system.
sometimes broke away and formed rival parties.
Answer:
The correct answer is A'' privately disagreed with the direction of the revolution
Explanation:
correct on edge 2021
The correct option is A). privately disagreed with the direction of the revolution.
What were Lenin's main ideas?Vladimir Lenin, was a Russian revolutionary and a political theorist, who served as the first head of government of Soviet Russia from 1917 to 1924.
Lenin basically wanted the Communist political parties in every country to lead the revolution. He was the leader of the Bolsheviks, which was a group of revolutionaries.
He wanted to help the the Russian people and made a promise to them for the peace, bread and land.
Learn more about the Lenin here:-
https://brainly.com/question/3656363
#SPJ2
"We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions. To maintain the existing relations between the two races, inhabiting that section of the Union, is indispensable to the peace and happiness of both. …There is and always has been in an advanced stage of wealth and civilization, a conflict between labor and capital. The condition of society in the South exempts us from the disorders and dangers resulting from this conflict; and which explains why it is that the political condition of the slaveholding States has been so much more stable and quiet than that of the North."
- Excerpt from John C. Calhoun’s speech “Slavery is a positive good,” February 6, 1837
Which statement BEST describes Calhoun's justification of slavery?
A) Slavery is necessary in the South because slaves are not capable of self-government.
B) Slavery is necessary in the South and without it there would be more labor conflicts.
C) Slavery is necessary in the South and has made the South much wealthier that the North.
D) Slavery is necessary in the South because the North is also dependent on this forced labor system.
Answer:
Calhoun justifies slavery by saying that there always needs to be a lower class, which Calhoun believes that it is African-Americans
Which would be C
Too much regulations (often devised with good intentions) leads to unitneded consquences and tend to help bigger businesses with money and connections in washington while hurting smaller businesses since they dont have the capital for lawyers and lobbyists and have to spend the smaller pool of money they have to comply with regulations.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that you are missing the question. You only attached a statement. If it is a true or false question, then the correct answer is "true."
It is true that too many regulations (often devised with good intentions) leads to unintended consequences and tend to help bigger businesses with money and connections in Washington while hurting smaller businesses.
What happens is that large firms or corporations are wealthy enough to pay for lobbyists that can negotiate favorable agreements with US Congressmen. Other businessmen belong to interest groups that have their own agendas and are always trying to influences legislators to approve the kind of laws that favor their companies.
If you traveled about 500 miles northwest from La Paz, you would be where?
Answer:
Im pretty sure its rio branco. Im so sorry if I got it wrong :(
which statement explains the significance of this colonial institution?
What is a primary source?
O A. An article in an encyclopedia, in a textbook, or on the Internet
B. A movie, play, or book based on a real event
C. A report about a past event that is written by a historian
D. A record that is made during or right after an event
Help fast! Please.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
dont take my word on it but im pretty sure. hope this helps.
What was a goal of the Committees of Correspondence that formed in the American colonies during the late 1700s? *
A. To coordinate colonial plans to resist British taxation
B. To negotiate a peace treaty with the British parliament
C. To develop a colonial strategy for defending against Spanish raids
D. To organize efforts by religious reformers to abolish African slavery
Answer:
Correct answer is A. To coordinate colonial plans to resist British taxation.
Explanation:
A is the correct answer because this Committees were formed after British government introduced new taxes and acts that made life harder for the colonists. This acts included Stamp Acts, Quartering act, Townshend acts and others.
B is correct because committees were formed before the war started.
C is not correct because they had no problems with Spaniards back then.
D is not correct as movement of abolishment was introduced mostly in the 19th Century.
what do the switches represent that
allow for different cell types? Explain what this allows our body to do
What do the people of Kosovo, the Scots, and the Basques all have in common?
Answer:
They have in common the fact that they are minority groups within internationally recognized countries, and that they have active separatist movements.
Explanation:
In the case of Kosovo, they are Albanians living in Serbia, and they declared independence in 2008, however, this declaration was not accepted by Serbia, and many other countries do not recognize Kosovo as a legally independent country.
The Scots held an independence referendum in 2014, but the option to remain part of the United Kingdom narrowly won.
Finally, the Basques have two main political parties: the Basque National Party, which does not seek independence, and Bildu, which seeks independence. Both parties have similar electoral power.
what is the name of donatello sculpture
Answer:
Which Sculpture? There is more than one lol.
Answer:
There are many which one though here are a few
David, Saint George, zuccone
Hope I helped if I did please give meh brainisest Thanks <3333 :3
Because Spain wanted to remain a strong force in North America it did all of the following EXCEPT:
a.
Aid America in its revolution
b.
Aid Great Britain against the revolution
c.
Provide trading rights along the Mississippi for America
d.
Provide trading rights along the Mississippi for Great Britain
Answer:
They did all except D. because I believe they wanted to declare war on Great Britain, so they would not have provided trading rights to someone that is there potential enemy.
Explanation:
Your Welcome Dominic :)
Answer:
c.
Provide trading rights along the Mississippi for America
In this activity, you will discuss the hypothetical scenarios below, and evaluate the president's decision in each of the cases below. You should draw upon your knowledge of the formal powers of the president outlined in Article II of the Constitution as well as the informal powers and roles enjoyed by modern presidents. Answer in complete sentences.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include the hypothetical scenarios, so we do not have that reference. However, doing some research we can say that one hypothetical scenario would be the following.
The President issues an order that women in the armed forces may now serve in direct combat capacity during wartime.
If this is the case, then we can comment on the following.
According to the formal powers of the president outlined in Article II of the Constitution, the President of the United States is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces: Army, Navy, Airforce, and Coast Guard. So the President has the power to issue orders in this regard.
This act is constitutional because it is included in the above-mentioned section of the COnstitution of the United States. As the Commander-in-Chief he is, he can order whatever he considers is necessary for the security of the nation and for the most benefit of the troops.
True or false. Amy doesn't manufacture good, she only makes things for herself
What is the significance of Third Parties? How have they impacted the electoral fortunes of the two major political parties? Give examples.
Answer:
American politics operate on a two-party system, meaning that two major political parties dominate voting in most elections and consequently dominate elected offices. In modern United States elections, the two major parties are the Democratic and Republican parties. These parties are associated with liberal and conservative views respectively, and nearly all elected officials are affiliated with one of the two. Campaign endorsements, funding, and resources are allocated to candidates on the basis of nomination by one of these two parties.
Explanation:
What was America’s original form of democratic government
Here is my essay of your question,
I often hear people argue that the United States is a republic, not a democracy. But that’s a false dichotomy. A common definition of “republic” is, to quote the American Heritage Dictionary, “A political order in which the supreme power lies in a body of citizens who are entitled to vote for officers and representatives responsible to them” — we are that. A common definition of “democracy” is, “Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives” — we are that, too.
Support our journalism. Subscribe today.
The United States is not a direct democracy, in the sense of a country in which laws (and other government decisions) are made predominantly by majority vote. Some lawmaking is done this way, on the state and local levels, but it’s only a tiny fraction of all lawmaking. But we are a representative democracy, which is a form of democracy.
And indeed the American form of government has been called a “democracy” by leading American statesmen and legal commentators from the Framing on. It’s true that some Framing-era commentators made arguments that distinguished “democracy” and “republic”; see, for instance, The Federalist (No. 10), though even that first draws the distinction between “pure democracy” and a “republic,” only later just saying “democracy.” But even in that era, “representative democracy” was understood as a form of democracy, alongside “pure democracy”: John Adams used the term “representative democracy” in 1794; so did Noah Webster in 1785; so did St. George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. Tucker’s Blackstone likewise uses “democracy” to describe a representative democracy, even when the qualifier “representative” is omitted.
Likewise, James Wilson, one of the main drafters of the Constitution and one of the first Supreme Court Justices, defended the Constitution in 1787 by speaking of the three forms of government being the “monarchical, aristocratical, and democratical,” and said that in a democracy the sovereign power is “inherent in the people, and is either exercised by themselves or by their representatives.” And Chief Justice John Marshall — who helped lead the fight in the 1788 Virginia Convention for ratifying the U.S. Constitution — likewise defended the Constitution in that convention by describing it as implementing “democracy” (as opposed to “despotism”), and without the need to even add the qualifier “representative.”
To be sure, in addition to being a representative democracy, the United States is also a constitutional democracy, in which courts restrain in some measure the democratic will. And the United States is therefore also a constitutional republic. Indeed, the United States might be labeled a constitutional federal representative democracy. But where one word is used, with all the oversimplification that this necessary entails, “democracy” and “republic” both work. Indeed, since direct democracy — again, a government in which all or most laws are made by direct popular vote — would be impractical given the number and complexity of laws that pretty much any state or national government is expected to enact, it’s unsurprising that the qualifier “representative” would often be omitted. Practically speaking, representative democracy is the only democracy that’s around at any state or national level.
Now one can certainly argue that some aspects of U.S. government should become less direct, and filtered through more layers of representation. One can argue, for instance, that the 17th Amendment should be repealed, and that U.S. senators should no longer be elected directly by the people, but should return to being elected by state legislators who are elected by the people. Or one can argue for repealing state- and local-level initiative and referendum schemes. Or one can argue for making the Electoral College into a deliberative body, in which the electors are supposed to discuss the candidates and make various political deals, rather than being elected solely to vote for particular candidates. And of course one can equally argue for making some aspects of U.S. government more direct, for instance by shifting to truly direct election of the president, or by institute a federal-level initiative and referendum.
But there is no basis for saying that the United States is somehow “not a democracy, but a republic.” “Democracy” and “republic” aren’t just words that a speaker can arbitrarily define to mean something (e.g., defining democracy as “a form of government in which all laws are made directly by the people”). They are terms that have been given meaning by English speakers more broadly. And both today and in the Framing era, “democracy” has been generally understood to include representative democracy as well as direct democracy.
HELP ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST AND A GOOD RATING IF YOU HELP ME QUICK.
On the map, which set of coordinates describe the absolute location of the city of Aden?
Answer:
I think it is 21
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Which of the following best describes how Europe’s borders changed as a result of the treaty of Versailles?
Answer: The Treaty of Versailles was the most important of the peace treaties that brought World War I to an end. The Treaty ended the state of war between Germany and the Allied Powers. It was signed on 28 June 1919 in Versailles, exactly five years after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which had directly led to the war.
Explanation:
how good of a president was george washington
Answer:
pretty subjective but being objective about it he was the one to pioneer the Americans into imperialism while modeling the government structure off of a country called the holy roman empire or at the time the holy roman states. He also layed out the groundwork for everything America is today.
Explanation:
Which of the following best characterizes the classical Greek city-states
Believed their government was stronger than the Romans
Sent four representatives to vote in the Senate
They each had their own independent governments.
Competed for control of the Greek empire in Athens
Answer:
They each had their own independent governments.
Explanation:
It is noteworthy that in the Greek empire the city-states like Athens, Sparta, Corinth, and Thebes, had their own independent governments, or in other words, had their own form of governance.
What this means is that, there was little centralization of power in the Greek empire, so it could be referred to as been a fragile empire.