Answer:
The Answer is D.
Answer:
The answer is d
Explanation:
Where in North American did the French and English settle
Answer:
As the English, Spanish and Dutch began to explore and claim parts of North America, Jacques Cartier began the French colonization of North American in 1534. By the 1720’s the colonies of Canada, Acadia, Hudson Bay, Newfoundland and Louisiana that made up New France were well established.
Explanation:
Which European explored North America on behalf of France?
Jacques Cartier
Vasco da Gama
Amerigo Vespucci
Christopher Columbus
The exploration of France, was Jacques Cartier's First North American Voyage.
Answer:
Jacques Cartier - or answer a
Explanation:
right on egde
what groups dominated politics in the American colonies
Which of these groups was most consistently opposed to the vietnam war by the late 1960s? fathers hippies doctors professors
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Which of these groups was most consistently opposed to the Vietnam War by the late 1960s? is the hippies
How did the Land Ordinance of 1785 impact education?
Answer:
On May 20, 1785, the Continental Congress passed a law providing for the surveying and selling of public lands. It provided that Lot 16 of every township should be reserved for the maintenance of public schools.
Explanation:
I live in a big city neighborhood _________ without a single bathroom.
What is supposed to be in the blank?
what specific benefit did the people gain from dance throughout the ancient egypt? and why?
Answer:
Music and dance were highly valued in ancient Egyptian culture, but they were more important than is generally thought: they were integral to creation and communion with the gods and, further, were the human response to the gift of life and all the experiences of the human condition.
What does the Policy Planning Staff (PPS) suggest will be used as a ""weapon for political action""? Are the ideas proposed by the PPS counter to concepts of ""self-determination""? Why or why not?
On the assumption that Western Europe will be rescued from communist control, the relationships between Great Britain and the continental countries, on the one hand, and between Great Britain and the United States and Canada on the other, will become for us a long term policy problem of major significance. The scope of this problem is so immense and its complexities so numerous that there can be no simple and easy answer. The solutions will have to be evolved step by step over a long period of time. But it is not too early today for us to begin to think out the broad outlines of the pattern which would best suit our national interests.
In my opinion, the following facts are basic to a consideration of this problem.
1.
Some form of political, military and economic union in Western Europe will be necessary if the free nations of Europe are to hold their own against the people of the east united under Moscow rule.
2.
It is questionable whether this union could be strong enough to serve its designed purpose unless it had the participation and support of Great Britain.
3.
Britain’s long term economic problem, on the other hand, can scarcely be solved just by closer association with the other Western European countries, since these countries do not have, by and large, the food and raw material surpluses she needs; this problem could be far better met by closer association with Canada and the United States.
4.
The only way in which a European union, embracing Britain but excluding eastern Europe, could become economically healthy would be to develop the closest sort of trading relationships” either with this hemisphere or with Africa.
It will be seen from the above that we stand before something of a dilemma. If we were to take Britain into our own U.S.-Canadian orbits according to some formula of “Union now”, this would probably solve Britain’s long term economic problem and create a natural political entity of great strength. But this would tend to cut Britain off from the close political association she is seeking with continental nations and might therefore have the ultimate effect of rendering the continental nations more vulnerable to Russian pressure. If, on the other hand, the British are encouraged to seek salvation only in closer association with [Page 511]their continental neighbors, then there is no visible solution of the long term economic problem of either Britain or Germany, and we would be faced, at the termination of ERP, with another crises of demand on this country for European aid.6
To me, there seem only two lines of emergence from this dilemma. They are not mutually exclusive and might, in fact, supplement each other very well.
In the first place, Britain could be encouraged to proceed vigorously with her plans for participation in a European union, and we could try to bring that entire union, rather than just Britain alone, into a closer economic association with this country and Canada. We must remember, however, that if this is to be really effective, the economic association must be so intimate as to bring about a substantial degree of currency and customs union, plus relative freedom of migration of individuals as between Europe and this continent. Only in this way can the free movement of private capital and labor be achieved which will be necessary if we are to find a real cure for the abnormal dependence of these areas on governmental aid from this country. But; we should also note carefully the possible implications of such a program from the standpoint of the ITO Charter.7 As I see it, the draft charter, as well as the whole theory behind our trade agreements program, would make it difficult for us to extend to the countries of western Europe special facilities which we did not extend in like measure to all other ITO members and trade agreement partners.
A second possible solution would lie in arrangements whereby a, union of Western European nations would undertake jointly the economic development and exploitation of the colonial and dependent areas of the African Continent. The realization of such a program admittedly presents demands which are probably well above the vision and strengths and leadership capacity of present governments in Western Europe. It would take considerable prodding from outside and ‘much patience. But the idea itself has much to recommend it. The African Continent is relatively little exposed to communist pressures; and most of it is not today a subject of great power rivalries. It lies easily accessible to the maritime nations of Western Europe, and politically they control or influence most of it. Its resources are still relatively undeveloped. It could absorb great numbers of people and a great deal of Europe’s surplus technical and administrative, energy.
What rules did the Alien Act establish?
Answer:
Establish to authorized detain, arrest any alien that was considered dangerous to the country, whether during war or peace.
How do you think opponents of the policy of brinkmanship reacted to the stockpiling of weapons during the arms race?
The Opponents of brinkmanship were of the opinion that both the US and the Soviet Union needed to work toward peace and de-escalation of conflict rather than the idea of Brinkmanship.
What is Brinkmanship?Brinkmanship refers to the policy of preparing to go to full scale war at a moment's notice and this relies on a competitive and robust stockpile of weapons especially between the world super powers.
The opponents of the idea of Brinkmanship were against this stockpile of weapons.
They were of the view that step should be taken toward ensuring peace rather than wars.
Learn more about Brinkmanship at https://brainly.com/question/9329193
83 POINTS!! PLS HELP ME ASAP PLS ILL GIVE YOU BRAINIEST
Answer:
1) AAA
2) CCC
3) NRA
4) NRA
5) FERA
Explanation:
how did sir syed bridge up the gap between british and muslims
Answer: During the First Indian War of Independence in 1857, Sir Syed stayed loyal to the British and saved European lives. After the rebellion was over, Sir Syed wrote an essay title “The Causes of the Indian Revolt” and claimed that the British were the main cause the rebellion. To close the gap between British Christians and the Indian Muslims, Sir Syed wrote 'The Loyal Mohammedans of India' in which he asked the British to end their hostility and proved that Muslims were loyal to the British. Furthermore, he wrote Tabyin-ul-Kalam, showing the similarities between the Quran and the Bible. He also established British Indian Association and continued to support both, closing the gap between Christians and Muslims.
Explanation: Hope this helps!
As a member of Congress, would
you do what you think is best for
the country or what is best for
you to keep your job?
(Remember, you would be
getting paid about $200,000 per
year.)
Answer:
I would do what is best for my country.
Explanation:
Because money is not everything, but seeing people's happiness and my country's happiness, development, growth, education is way better! Well that's my opinion and that's what I think is the best!
Hope this helped you!
Which of the following is NOT a possible cause of the end of the Mycenaean civilization
a. ice-age climate change
c. invaders called Dorians
b. drought
d. civil war
Answer:
Not really a clear answer
Explanation:
The potential reasons for the downfall of Maya civilization in the southern lowlands, including overpopulation, environmental degradation, warfare, shifting trade routes and extended drought.
URGENT PLEASE-
Why did Isma'il clash with the Ottoman ruler Selim the Grim?
A. Selim planned to marry a Safavid princess
B. Selim executed all Shi'a Muslims living in his empire
C. Selim refused to open trade with the Safavid Empire
D. Selim would not surrender land to Isma'il
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Isma'il clash with the Ottoman ruler Selim the Grim because Selim executed all Shi'a Muslims living in his empire. Thus, option B is correct.
What was Ottoman Empire?Ottoman Empire was one of the most powerful and enduring dynasties in human history, which lasted for 600 years, this Islamic superpower reigned over sizable portions of the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and North Africa.
The Ottoman Empire became the leading Muslim state as a result of Selim's conquest of the Middle Eastern heartlands of the Muslim world, especially after he assumed the responsibility of protector of the pilgrimage routes to Mecca and Medina.
Therefore, it is concluded that Selim the Grim, the Ottoman tyrant, executed every Shi'a Muslim who lived in his dominion, which caused Isma'il and Selim to clash. Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about Ottoman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/21258779
#SPJ2
Why did Parliament eventually repeal the Stamp Act, which taxed goods such as newspapers and playing cards? *
10 points
A. The colonists established a blockade against British goods.
B. The colonists were able to produce their own goods.
C. The colonists started destroying British goods.
D. The colonists began boycotting British goods.
Answer:
D writing this because answer has to be 20 characters long
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Why did Parliament eventually repeal the Stamp Act, which taxed goods such as newspapers and playing cards? The colonists established a blockade against British goods. The colonists were able to produce their own goods.
I need this nowwwww!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
B, C, and E
Explanation:
Hope this helps
How are Electoral votes calculated for each state?
Answer:
The number of representatives plus two electors
Explanation:
A state's number of electors equals the number of representatives plus two electors for the senators the state has in the United States Congress. The number of representatives is based on the respective populations, determined every ten years by the United States Census. (source ; United States Electoral College - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org)
Number of electors equal the number of representatives plus two electors for the senators the state has....
Is a permanently insane person considered a moral agent? What about a person with some psychological trauma, psychiatric illness episode, or medical condition that rendered him insane at the time he committed the crime? Is he a moral agent?
Answer:
......
Explanation:
What is Mercantilism and what is it based on?
Answer:
Mercantilism was an economic system of trade that spanned from the 16th century to the 18th century. Mercantilism was based on the idea that a nation's wealth and power were best served by increasing exports and so involved increasing trade.
Explanation:
Answer:
Mercantilism is an economic practice by which governments used their economies to augment state power at the expense of other countries.
Explanation:
which colony was first settled by Dutch settlers?
Answer:
the answer is new Netherland :)
Explanation:
Answer:
New York
Explanation:
NY was the first New Netherland until the Dutch governor was forced to surrender to the stronger British forces.
Which term describes the position held by many Americans in 1800s that it was God’s will that the United States expand its borders?
A. Compromise of 1850
B. Monroe Doctrine
C. Popular Sovereignty
D. Manifest Destiny
Answer:
D.) Manifest Destiny
Explanation:
The idea of Manifest Destiny was that the United States had a God-given right to conquer all of North America. The idea of Manifest Destiny resulted in substantial geographical expansion in the nineteenth century. I hope this helps! ^-^
Answer:
D. Manifest Destiny
Explanation:
What is Manifest Destiny?
Manifest Destiny was a popular American belief to many Americans during the 1800s (19th century). This belief was saying that they're "destined" by God to expand its borders west.Have a lovely rest of your day/night, and good luck with your assignments! ♡
Why is Beijing such an important trading center
Answer:
Trade with China is important to the health of the U.S. economy but the communist nation must continue implementing key reforms to improve market access, a new report says. China purchased 7.3 percent of all U.S. exports, $165 billion in goods and services from the United States in 2015
Explanation:
Which statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause-
and-effect relationship shown in the diagram?
Cause
Effect
The British tax
American colonists but
don't give them any say
in the British
government
American colonists
declare their
independence from
Great Britain.
A. The British treatment of American colonists had no effect on daily
life in the colonies.
OB. The British treatment of the American colonists was one of the
causes of the American Revolution.
C. The British treatment of American colonists inspired support for
the British king
D. The British treatment of American colonists was one of the
reasons the British got rid of their colonies in North America.
Answer: C
Explanation:
For apex
Answer:
the correct answer is the british treatmeant of the american colonist was one of the causes of the american revolution.
Explanation:
i just took the ap3x quiz
Someone Help Plz!
Which colonists and Native Americans MOST LIKELY suffered the worst effects of ongoing wars between Britain and France and their colonies?
A.
those who had migrated west to start new settlements
B.
those living in developed lands and cities along the Atlantic coast
C.
those living in frontier areas between French and British colonies
D.
those who had formed united communities through intermarriage
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The natives living in frontier areas suffered the worst effects because they were constantly caught making alliances with the colonists and fighting in wars that never benefited them in any way except for death and relocation.
Those living in frontier areas between French and British colonies most likely suffered the worst effects of ongoing wars between Britain and France and their colonies.
Explanation:
The French and Indian War began as a conflict between Great Britain and France, claiming over territory, trade, control of the Grand Banks, waterways, etc.
The conflict began in the frontier between one another for control of land and dominance.The colonists and Native Americans were most likely effect by the wars as they were in the frontier area and constantly caught in forming alliances with one another for many reasons.Many colonists joined wars to get support from their government to secure their settlements.Native Americans joined to gain power and expand their territories through alliances.The wars and alliance with the British and French did not benefit them as they became part of the destruction, death and resettlement.Therefore we can conclude that the colonists and Native Americans suffered from wars as they were forcefully involved in it as they lived in frontier areas.
Thus Option C. those living in frontier areas between French and British colonies is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the French and Indian War" here:
brainly.com/question/904638
Which of the following would be an implied power in the Constitution?
creating the armed forces
regulating the internet
printing new currency
affirming new judges
Why were the caliphates of Cordoba a religious success?
The caliphate of Cordoba was a success because Muslims, Jews, and Christians got along as a result of the Islamic leaders who were tolerant of other religions.
How does the Bill of Rights protect the idea of federalism?
Answer:
limiting the power of the federal government.
Explanation:
What was Pontiac’s Rebellion?
Answer:
Pontiac's War, also known as Pontiac's Conspiracy or Pontiac's Rebellion, was launched in 1763 by a loose confederation of American Indian tribes, primarily from the Great Lakes region, the Illinois Country, and Ohio Country who were dissatisfied with British policies in the Great Lakes region following the French and Indian War (1754–1763). Warriors from numerous tribes joined the uprising in an effort to drive British soldiers and settlers out of the region. The war is named after Odawa leader Pontiac, the most prominent of many Indian leaders in the conflict.
Answer:
The Pontiac Rebellion was when a confederacy of Native American warriors under Ottawa chief Pontiac attacks the British force at Detroit.
Explanation:
Hope that helps :p
In what year was cotton production and the slave population lowest?
Answer:
The answer is the late 1800s
Explanation:
Its correct