Use the graph below to find f(-2) =

answer: (3,2)

step by step explanation: :)

Answer:

Stephanie needs 220ft² of more soil to cover the rest of her yard.

Step-by-step explanation:

First add the bags she already has:125ft²+65ft²+x=410ft² --> 190ft²+x=410ft²

Second use the subtraction property of equality: 190ft²-190ft²+x=410ft²-190ft² ---> x=220ft²

Step-by-step explanation:

√z is defined only when z >= 0

Therefore √x - 1 is defined only when (x - 1) >= 0, x >= 1.

The only graph that shows the domain x >= 1 is graph Y.

assuming the 9 6 and 9 11 are fractions, we get:

9 x ( 6 + 11 ) = (9/6) (9/11)​ =

153 = 27/22

Answer:

9(17) = (9 x 6)+(9 x 11)

153 = 54 + 99

153 = 153

Hope this helped! If it did, please give me brainliest! It would help a lot! Thanks! :D

Answer:

once you have a common denominator, you simply add the numerators together and then simplify.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

11 is N

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know the first answer is 2, we can subtract 82 by 2. Afterwards we can divide by 8 since we are counting by 8s, this gets me 10. 10 + the first number is 11

Answer:

0.5 gallons per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-29 (86by-step explanation:

Answer:

a

The decision rule  is  

Reject the null hypothesis

  The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference between the performances of these two models

b

The  95% confidence interval is  [tex] 0.224   <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < 2.776  [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The sample size is  n  =  36

    The first sample mean is  [tex]\= x_1 = 11.4[/tex]

    The first standard deviation is  [tex]s_1 = 2.5[/tex]

    The second sample mean is   [tex]\= x_2 = 9.9[/tex]

     The second standard deviation is  [tex]s_2 = 3.0[/tex]

      The level of significance is  [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu_1 - \mu_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu_1 - \mu_2 \ne 0[/tex]

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

      [tex]z = \frac{ (\= x_1 - \= x_2 ) - (\mu_1 - \mu_2 ) }{ \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2 }{n} + \frac{s_2^2 }{ n} } }[/tex]

=>    [tex]z = \frac{ ( 11.4 - 9.9) - 0 }{ \sqrt{ \frac{2.5^2 }{36} + \frac{ 3^2 }{36 } } }[/tex]

=>     [tex]z = 2.3[/tex]

From the z table  the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to  2.3 is  

       [tex]P( Z > 2.3 ) = 0.010724[/tex]

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

      [tex]p-value = 2 * P( Z > 2.3 )[/tex]

=>    [tex]p-value = 2 * 0.010724[/tex]

=>    [tex]p-value = 0.02[/tex]

From the value obtained we see that  [tex]p-value < \alpha[/tex] hence  

The decision rule  is  

Reject the null hypothesis

  The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence to show that there is a difference between the performances of these two models

Considering question b

From the question we are told the confidence level is  95% , hence the level of significance is    

      [tex]\alpha = (100 - 95 ) \%[/tex]

=>   [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Generally from the normal distribution table the critical value  of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] is  

   [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } =  1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \sqrt{ \frac{s_1^2 }{n } + \frac{s_2^2}{n}} [/tex]

 => [tex]E = 1.96  *    \sqrt{ \frac{2.5^2 }{ 36 } + \frac{ 3^2}{36}}  [/tex]

  => [tex]E = 1.276   [/tex]

Generally 95% confidence interval is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]( \= x_1 - \= x_2) -E <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < ( \= x_1 - \= x_2) + E [/tex]

=>  [tex]( 11.4 - 9.9 ) -1.276  <  \mu_1 - \mu_2 < ( 11.4 - 9.9 ) + 1.276   [/tex]

=>  [tex] 0.224   <  \mu_1 - \mu_2  < 2.776  [/tex]

Answer:

70 is the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

ggsgshdghdhdhdhhdhdhdhd

Answer:

70

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

0.28

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes they are similar

step 1: flip it across the y-axis

step 2: translate it 4 units to the right and 5 units down

step 3: dilate it by a factor of 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Final Answer: [tex]-12x + 1.5[/tex]

Steps/Reasons/Explanation:

Question: Which expression is equivalent to [tex]-3(4x - 0.50)?[/tex]

Step 1: Expand by distributing terms.

[tex]-3[/tex] × [tex]4x - 3[/tex] × [tex]-0.50[/tex]

Step 2: Simplify [tex]-3[/tex] × [tex]4x[/tex] to [tex]-12x[/tex].

[tex]-12x - 3[/tex] × [tex]-0.50[/tex]

Step 3: Simplify [tex]3[/tex] × [tex]-0.50[/tex] to [tex]-1.5[/tex].

[tex]-12x - (-1.5)[/tex]

Step 4: Remove parentheses and add.

[tex]-12x + 1.5[/tex]

~I hope I helped you :)~

Answer:

27.88 can be rounded to whatever the question wants you to, coz it needs to be a whole no.---> so I would say 28 weeks, but it depends on what the question asks

Step-by-step explanation:

18w+38= should equal to $540

rephrasing this in a mathematical way would be-

18w+38=$540

18w=$540-38

18w=502

w=502/18

w=27.88

Answer:

The answer is 27. 88 but if this is like a test and not a open end question than the answer is 27 ;)

Answer:

the correct graph is B

Step-by-step explanation:

to check, you can see that my graph and graph in answer B both intersects at (-1,2)

Answer:

5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

y - 1/2 = -(x + 1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Use point slope form, y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line

Plug in the point given and the slope:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

y - 1/2 = -(x + 1/2)

So, the equation is y - 1/2 = -(x + 1/2)

Answer:

y - 1/2 = -(x + 1/2)

2-2=-1(1+1)

Step-by-step explanation:

slope is given

y-y1=m(x-x1)

Answer:

y=[tex]\frac{1}{2}x-2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Because of the slope, we would assume that it is 1/2 because when you use rise over run, the graph rises 1 unit up and shifts 2 units to the right.  The -2 is where the y-intercept is (0, -2) based on the picture seen above.  The slope is also positive where it is going up instead of going down.

Answer:

4 x 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The matrix shown in the illustration has 4 rows and 1 column, and thus we give the dimensions as 4 x 1.

Answer:

weird

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

ok

Step-by-step explanation:

answered it. but I really need the answer tho like rn!

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

5 + 2 = 7

Answer:

Rise = 0

Run = 4

Slope = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope of straight line = [tex]\frac{\text{Rise}}{\text{Run}}[/tex]

Since, given line is passing through two points (-2, -3) and (2, -3),

Rise of the line = -3 - (-3) = 0

Run of the given line = 2 - (-2) = 4

By substituting these values of rise and run in the formula,

Slope = [tex]\frac{0}{4}[/tex]

          = 0

Therefore, Rise = 0

                  Run = 4

                 Slope = 0

Note:  Slope of a line parallel to the x-axis is zero.

           Slope of a line parallel to y-axis is not defined.

Answer: It's A. 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

its not a

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I think it might be 16 or 24.

Step-by-step explanation:

Pardon if I'm wrong.

2/3 is the answer   becuase 72/6 = 12 12/6 = 2/3

Answer:

7x50=350

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

I believe that the awnser is 2.5 and 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The other person is right

Step-by-step explanation: